Developing New Clinical Management Strategies

NCT ID: NCT02082392

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study utilizes a 2 x 2, double-blind, acute, prospective design randomizing adult outpatients with MDD to "Research Frequency Management" (RFM, weekly study visits) vs. "Community Frequency Management" (CFM, every 4 weeks study visits) and antidepressant medication vs.placebo. Specifying visit frequency as the independent variable in this study has the distinct advantages of being easily operationalized for research purposes avoiding a priori assumptions about which components of study visits influence antidepressant and placebo response (i.e., behavioral activation vs. doctor-patient relationship vs. medical procedures). Close monitoring of all subjects will be assured by telephone evaluations of individuals randomized to CFM at intervals between monthly visits, and additional study contacts will be scheduled as necessary to maintain patient safety (all extra-protocol contacts will be recorded and included as a variable in outcome analyses). Additionally, subjects will be characterized extensively on clinical, demographic, and psychological measures to pilot the study assessment battery and search for predictor variables influencing the effects of contact frequency on medication and placebo response.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo

Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

A substance or treatment of no intended therapeutic value in a pill form.

Research Frequency Management: Placebo

Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

A substance or treatment of no intended therapeutic value in a pill form.

Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram

Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram

Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

A substance or treatment of no intended therapeutic value in a pill form.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lexapro

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. men and women aged 18-60 years
* 2\. diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) IV Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
* 3\. 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score greater than or equal to 18
* 4\. capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures
* 5\. using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Current comorbid Axis I DSM IV disorder other than Nicotine Dependence, Adjustment Disorder, or Anxiety Disorder
* 2\. diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (excluding Nicotine Dependence) within the past 12 months
* 3\. present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder
* 4\. baseline HRSD score \> 28 or HRSD suicide item \> 2
* 5\. history of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode
* 6\. current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers
* 7\. CGI-Severity score of 7 at baseline
* 8\. acute, severe, or unstable medical illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

New York State Psychiatric Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bret Rutherford

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bret Rutherford, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New York State Psychiatric Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York State Psychiatric Institute

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#6652

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Depression in Adults
NCT00073697 COMPLETED PHASE4