Trial Outcomes & Findings for Developing New Clinical Management Strategies (NCT NCT02082392)
NCT ID: NCT02082392
Last Updated: 2020-03-03
Results Overview
scale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The HRSD is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. Although the HRSD list 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17 items. sum of the scores of the first 17 items (range from 0 to 54): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression \>=23 = Very Severe Depression
COMPLETED
PHASE4
3 participants
Baseline week
2020-03-03
Participant Flow
Recruitment will be coordinated through the Adult and Late Life Depression Research Clinic and will include flyers posted around Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), information posted on the CUMC internet website, advertisements in local newspapers and on radio stations, and outreach to CUMC clinical staff.
Interested individuals will contact the ALLDRC coordinator, a telephone screening will take place to identify obviously ineligible subjects. Potentially eligible subjects will be scheduled for an evaluation in the ALLDRC, including a clinical interview by a study clinician (psychiatrist or psychologist) and diagnostic rating by trained rater.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Clinical Frequency Management
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Escitalopram
|
Research Frequency Management
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Escitalopram
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Developing New Clinical Management Strategies
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Clinical Frequency Management
n=2 Participants
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Escitalopram
|
Research Frequency Management
n=1 Participants
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Escitalopram
|
Total
n=3 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
|
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0 • n=7 Participants
|
46.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.08 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline weekscale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The HRSD is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. Although the HRSD list 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17 items. sum of the scores of the first 17 items (range from 0 to 54): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression \>=23 = Very Severe Depression
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Clinical Frequency Management
n=2 Participants
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Escitalopram
|
Research Frequency Management
n=1 Participants
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Escitalopram
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
|
25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.24
|
31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline weekScale for anxiety symptoms administered by trained rater. The HARS is a standard measure of anxiety severity in pharmacotherapy studies that has been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity in studies of depressed patients. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4(severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indi-cates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and25-30 moderate to severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Clinical Frequency Management
n=2 Participants
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Escitalopram
|
Research Frequency Management
n=1 Participants
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Escitalopram
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) 14-item Scale
|
9.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.78
|
13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline weekscales developed to measure the clinician's view of subjects' global functioning before and after initiating a study medication. The CGI correlates well with other standard outcome measures for depression (e.g., HRSD), is sensitive to change in antidepressant trials, and offers clinically understandable anchor points. 7-point scale: 0 = Not assessed 4 = Moderately ill 1 = Normal, not at all ill 5 = Markedly ill 2 = Borderline mentally ill 6 = Severely ill 3 = Mildly ill 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Clinical Frequency Management
n=2 Participants
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4.
Escitalopram
|
Research Frequency Management
n=1 Participants
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders.
Escitalopram
|
|---|---|---|
|
CGI Severity and Improvement
|
3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline weekPopulation: Data were not collected
rating scale for physical symptoms reported during the study. This is a standard means of recording drug-related adverse effects that will allow us to assess whether contact frequency is associated with differences in side effects among study subjects.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline weekPopulation: Data were not collected
24 item Likert scale rating the clinician's assessment of the therapeutic alliance, particularly about medication issues, with the patient. This scale is superior to other therapeutic alliance scales because it is focused on drug treatment and does not contain items specific to psychotherapy. Prior studies using the CALPAS reported an association between therapeutic alliance and outcome, and some studies found alliance mediated the effect of expectancy on depression outcome.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data were not collected
Rates clinician's guess as to the identity of study medication and the confidence in that guess. This assessment is necessary to document the effectiveness of the study's methods of treatment allocation concealment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 WeeksPopulation: Data were not collected
rating scale for depressive symptoms based on DSM criteria. A self-report measure for depressive symptoms is valuable in this study, because it is less susceptible to clinician and rater bias. The QIDS-SR has been increasingly used in antidepressant studies (e.g., STAR\*D) due to its equivalent weightings for each symptom item, clearly understandable anchor points, and inclusion of all DSM criteria for depression
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 WeeksPopulation: Data were not collected
8 item scale in which subjects rate their impression of the credibility of the treatment and how they estimate their expectation of improvement. The CES is the most widely used measure of expectancy and has demonstrated good psychometric properties in multiple studies. For this study, the primary measure of expectancy will be item 4: "By the end of the treatment period, how much improvement in your depressive symptoms do you think will occur?" (0-100%).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 WeeksPopulation: Data were not collected
self-administered scale with items rating respondents' satisfaction with mental health services they are receiving on a 4 point Likert scale. Use of the CSQ 8 will allow us to determine whether CFM and RFM are associated with differences in participant satisfaction.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data were not collected
scale used in mental health studies to document the type and strength of patients' treatment preferences. We will use a modified version in this study asking subjects "Based on your experience and how you feel right now, which of the visit frequencies in this study would be your first choice?" The strength of this preference will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data were not collected
scale developed to assess individual differences in generalized optimism versus pessimism. Degree of optimism on this scale has been correlated with the magnitude of placebo response observed in studies of placebo analgesia, and we will determine whether LOT-R scores moderate effects of therapeutic contact.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data were not collected
this questionnaire is a widely used assessment tool for personality disorders that we will also use to identify predictors of response to varying visit frequency.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data were not collected
24 item Likert scale rating the patient's assessment of the therapeutic alliance, particularly about medication issues, with the clinician. This scale is superior to other therapeutic alliance scales because it is focused on drug treatment and does not contain items specific to psychotherapy.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 weeksPopulation: Data were not collected
rates subject's guess as to the identity of study medication and the confidence in that guess. This assessment is necessary to document the effectiveness of the study's methods of treatment allocation concealment.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Clinical Frequency Management
Research Frequency Management
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place