Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of an Oral Aripiprazole/Escitalopram Combination Therapy in Participants With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

NCT ID: NCT01111539

Last Updated: 2021-10-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

211 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-13

Study Completion Date

2011-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This will be a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study designed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of an oral Aripiprazole/Escitalopram combination therapy in participants with MDD who have demonstrated an incomplete response to a prospective trial of Escitalopram, and report a treatment history for the current MDD episode of an inadequate response to at least one and no more than three adequate trials of an approved antidepressant other than Escitalopram. An inadequate response is defined as less than a 50% reduction in depressive symptom severity as assessed by the participant's self-report on the Massachusetts General Hospital Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ) and evaluated by the investigator as part of the participant's medical and psychiatric history. An adequate trial is defined as an antidepressant treatment for at least 6 weeks duration (or at least 3 weeks for combination treatments) at an approved dose as specified in the ATRQ.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be organized as follows:

* Screening Phase
* Single-blind Prospective Treatment Phase
* Single-blind Continuation Phase (Responder) or Double-blind Randomization Phase (non-Responder)
* 30 day Post Treatment Follow-up

Assigned Interventions:

* Escitalopram monotherapy
* Aripiprazole/Escitalopram combination therapy
* Aripiprazole monotherapy

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Phase B: Single-blind Prospective Treatment Phase

Participants received initial dose of escitalopram 10 milligram (mg) blinded capsule (over-encapsulated tablet), orally, once daily, increased to 20 mg/day at the end of Week 1 based upon tolerability profile, for up to maximum of Week 8. No dose reductions were allowed after Week 4 and no dose increments were allowed after Week 3. Participants with incomplete response at the end of the Phase B (Week 8) entered Phase C and the rest of the participants continued to Phase B+.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Escitalopram capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Blinded capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded capsule administered orally, once daily.

Phase B+: Single-blind Phase B Responders

Participants with response (≥50% reduction in depressive symptom severity in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale {HAM-D17} Total Score; or a HAM-D17 Total Score of \<14 at Week 8 or a Clinical Global Impression of Improvement {CGI-I} Score of \<3 at the Week 6 or 8) at the end of the Phase B (Week 8) continued treatment with the single-blind escitalopram monotherapy at the dose (10 or 20 mg/day blinded capsules) taken during the final week of Phase B, for up to maximum of Week 14, in Phase B+.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Escitalopram capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Blinded capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded capsule administered orally, once daily.

Phase C: Aripiprazole/Escitalopram Combination

Participants with incomplete response (less than 50% reduction in depressive symptom severity between Baseline and Week 8 measured by the HAM-D17 Total Score and HAM-D17 Total Score of ≥14 at Week 8 and CGI-I Score of ≥3 at Week 6 and 8) at Week 8 received initial dose of aripiprazole 6 mg blinded capsule, orally, once daily at Week 9. Participants were up titrated to aripiprazole target dose of 12 mg/day at Week 10 (if initial 6 mg/day dose was tolerated) or down titrated to 3 mg/day (if significant tolerability issues arise on initial 6 mg/day dose), and thereafter received same dose up to maximum of Week 14. No dose increases were allowed for aripiprazole after end of Week 12, however, doses might be decreased at any visit based upon tolerability. In combination with aripiprazole, participants received escitalopram (10 or 20 mg/day blinded capsules) taken during final week of Phase B for up to maximum Week 14, in Phase C. No dose adjustments allowed for escitalopram during Phase C.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Escitalopram capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Aripiprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Aripiprazole capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Blinded capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded capsule administered orally, once daily.

Phase C: Escitalopram Monotherapy

Participants with incomplete response (less than a 50% reduction in depressive symptom severity between the Baseline and Week 8 as measured by the HAM-D17 Total Score and a HAM-D17 Total Score of ≥14 at Week 8 and a CGI-I Score of ≥3 at Week 6 and 8) at Week 8, received escitalopram dose (10 or 20 mg/day blinded capsules) taken during the final week of Phase B for up to maximum Week 14, in Phase C. No dose adjustments were allowed for escitalopram monotherapy during Phase C.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Escitalopram capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Blinded capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded capsule administered orally, once daily.

Phase C: Aripiprazole Monotherapy

Participants with incomplete response (less than a 50% reduction in depressive symptom severity between the Baseline and Week 8 as measured by the HAM-D17 Total Score and a HAM-D17 Total Score of ≥14 at Week 8 and a CGI-I Score of ≥3 at Week 6 and 8) at Week 8, received initial dose of aripiprazole 6 mg blinded capsule, orally, once daily for Week 9. Participants were up titrated to the aripiprazole target dose of 12 mg/day at Week 10 (if the initial 6 mg/day dose was tolerated) or down titrated to 3 mg/day (if significant tolerability issues arise on the initial 6 mg/day dose), and thereafter received the same dose for up to maximum of Week 14. No dose increases were allowed for aripiprazole after the end of Week 12, however, doses might be decreased at any visit based upon tolerability.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aripiprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Aripiprazole capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Blinded capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded capsule administered orally, once daily.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Escitalopram

Escitalopram capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Intervention Type DRUG

Aripiprazole

Aripiprazole capsule administered orally, once daily without regard to meals.

Intervention Type DRUG

Blinded capsule

Blinded capsule administered orally, once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants with a current diagnosis of a major depressive episode. The current depressive episode must be ≥8 weeks in duration
* Participants willing to discontinue all prohibited psychotropic medication starting from the time of signing the informed consent and during the study period
* Participants with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) Total Score ≥18 at the Baseline Visit for the Prospective Treatment Phase

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of prior treatment with an antidepressant during the current depressive episode
* Participants who report treatment with adjunctive or monotherapy antipsychotic treatment during the current depressive episode
* Participants experiencing hallucinations, delusions or any psychotic symptomatology in the current depressive episode
* Participants with epilepsy or significant history of seizure disorders
* Participants with a clinically significant current diagnosis of borderline, antisocial, paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal or histrionic personality disorder
* Participants who have received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the last 10 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cerritos, California, United States

Site Status

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Cromwell, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Fort Walton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Libertyville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Fresh Meadows, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

DeSoto, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Brown Deer, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Jämejala, , Estonia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Ostfildern, , Germany

Site Status

Study Site 1

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Study Site 2

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Site Status

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Tlalnepantla, Estado Do Mexico, Mexico

Site Status

Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico

Site Status

Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Keelung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Estonia Finland Germany India Italy Mexico South Korea Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-018796-21

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

31-08-255

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id