30 Day Mobile App Programs for Stress Management in Customer Service Representatives

NCT ID: NCT03803865

Last Updated: 2020-07-15

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 100 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2019-02-07
• Study Completion Date: 2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Burnout and stress at work can make individuals less productive, which can carry over into their personal and at-home lives and negatively impact health. Customer service representatives are under especially high strain as they are exposed to significant interpersonal conflict at work, both with frustrated customers and with pressure from coworkers and supervisors. However, recent research has found that different stress management interventions (e.g., mindfulness meditation training) can increase job satisfaction and work productivity. However, individuals with significant stress might find these training program classes difficult to attend with their busy schedules. Newer interventions have focused on smartphone mobile applications as an effective delivery system for these training programs. Thus, the purpose of this project is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two different stress management smartphone app programs to evaluate effects on job-related outcomes, functional and structural brain outcomes, and biology.

Detailed Description

Approach: Employees will be given study flyers describing the study and encouraged to call a project hotline to evaluate their study eligibility. Eligible participants will be scheduled for an in-person study baseline and neuroimaging appointment at Carnegie Mellon University where they will provide written informed consent, complete baseline survey measures, provide several drops of blood via a finger prick (Dried Blood Spot (DBS) samples), and complete a 60-minute neuroimaging scan. After completing baseline measures participants will be instructed on how to download and use the Headspace smartphone app, and will be randomly assigned to one of the two programs. Participants will be asked to complete a 7- minute end-of-day daily diary measure each day during the treatment period, which will measure stress, affect, sleep, and workplace perceptions (a text message link will be sent an hour before the participant's standard bedtime each day). The project team will monitor treatment adherence (participants who do not complete a daily practice session will be called and reminded the following day). In the week following the end of the treatment period, participants will be scheduled to come back to Carnegie Mellon for a post-treatment appointment where they will complete the same measures as at baseline (survey measures, DBS, and neuroimaging). Participants will then be debriefed, compensated, and dismissed. Approximately two months after participants complete the 30-day program, we will call them for a 15-minute follow-up call. During this call, participants will answer a few questionnaire items and a brief program evaluation.

Interventions: Participants will be asked to complete one lesson daily for 30- days on the Headspace app; the first ten lessons will be 10 minutes long, the next ten will be 15 minutes long, and the final ten will be 20 minutes long. The mindfulness program will consist of the standard base program offered in Headspace. The Recharge program will consist of problem solving and stress management instruction.

Setting and Participants: David Creswell's Health and Human Performance Laboratory at Carnegie Mellon University will direct this study. Participants will be customer service employees (those who interact with customers daily via phone or in-person interactions) recruited from the Pittsburgh region.

Conditions

Psychological Stress; Inflammation

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Headspace

30-day smartphone based mindfulness training intervention consisting of 10-minutes for the first 10 days, 15 minutes for the next 10 days, and 20 minutes for the final 10 days.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mindfulness Training

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Guided mindfulness meditation and stress management training

Recharge

30-day smartphone based reflection and problem solving training intervention consisting of 10-minutes for the first 10 days, 15 minutes for the next 10 days, and 20 minutes for the final 10 days.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reflection and Problem Solving

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Guided reflection,problem solving,and analytical thinking training

Interventions

Mindfulness Training

Guided mindfulness meditation and stress management training

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Reflection and Problem Solving

Guided reflection,problem solving,and analytical thinking training

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Fluent in English

• 18-70 years old
• Planning to remain in the Pittsburgh area for the duration of participation
• Endorse significant work stress

Exclusion Criteria

• Any significant mental and physical health conditions
• Metal implants
• Significant claustrophobia

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 70 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Headspace Meditation Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Carnegie Mellon University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

David Creswell, Ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Carnegie Mellon University

Locations

Carnegie Mellon University

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Countries

United States

References

Slutsky J, Chin B, Raye J, Creswell JD. Mindfulness training improves employee well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):139-149. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000132. Epub 2018 Oct 18.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30335419 (View on PubMed)

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 6668417 (View on PubMed)

Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):472-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.3.472.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7431205 (View on PubMed)

Wegner DM, Zanakos S. Chronic thought suppression. J Pers. 1994 Dec;62(4):616-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00311.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7861307 (View on PubMed)

Singh, J., Goolsby, J. R., & Rhoads, G. K. (1994). Behavioral and psychological consequences of boundary spanning burnout for customer service representatives. Journal of Marketing Research, 558-569.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG. A longitudinal study of job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: results from a three-year follow-up. Psychosom Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;60(6):697-706. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199811000-00007.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9847028 (View on PubMed)

Macdonald, S., & Maclntyre, P. (1997). The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13(2), 1-16.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Waumsley, J. A., Houston, D. M., & Marks, G. (2010). What about us? Measuring the work- life balance of people who do not have children. Review of European Studies , 2(2), 3- 17.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Cole SW, Conti G, Arevalo JM, Ruggiero AM, Heckman JJ, Suomi SJ. Transcriptional modulation of the developing immune system by early life social adversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20578-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218253109. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23184974 (View on PubMed)

Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12703651 (View on PubMed)

Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8628042 (View on PubMed)

Radloff, L.S. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16443717 (View on PubMed)

Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in personal relationships, 1(1), 37-67.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005). The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 29(2), 83-102.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Cardaciotto L, Herbert JD, Forman EM, Moitra E, Farrow V. The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment. 2008 Jun;15(2):204-23. doi: 10.1177/1073191107311467. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18187399 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

FP00000925

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id