Factors Contributing to Single and Dual Task Performance of Four Square Step Tests

NCT ID: NCT03785639

Last Updated: 2020-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-14

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are many tests that evaluate fall and balance. As a clinical test, the Four Square Step Test (FSST)Test is reliable, valid, easy to score, quick to administer, requires little space, and needs no special equipment. It is unique in that it involves stepping over low objects (2.5cm) and movement in 4 directions. FSST was developed in 2002 to measure the rapid stepping that is often required when changing direction and avoiding obstacles while walking. The FSST requires a stopwatch and four single point sticks. Using the sticks resting flat on the floor to form a cross, the subject starts in one square and steps in one direction into each of the four squares and then reverses direction back to the start. The FSST is unique in that it challenges motor planning, sequencing and recall, whilst simultaneously providing clinicians with the opportunity to measure and observe a person's clearance of low obstacles at speed. The ability to clear the trail leg when stepping over an obstacle has been shown to be reduced in healthy populations. Dual task is simultaneous performance of two tasks that can be performed independently, measured separately and with different goals. Individuals have difficulties in performing two tasks together. When two tasks are performed at the same time, deterioration in performance of one or both is called dual task interference. This occurs when task requirements exceed the capacity. Age, walking speed, lower extremity muscle strength and cognitive status are factors that contribute to the dual task. In addition, prioritizing the motor or cognitive task in a dual task affects the dual task performance. Knowing these factors and improving some of them can help to create training programs designed to improve the dual task performance of individuals. There are several studies investigating factors contributing to dual task performance that focus on balance in the elderly. However, the studies including middle age group are limited. There are no studies evaluating the factors contributing to the single and dual task performance of FSST in the literature. In this study, it is aimed to explain the factors related to motor and cognitive functions to the single and dual task performance of FSST.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants: Healthy middle age group (50-65 years) Method: Demographic information of all participants (age, gender, body mass index), educational level (primary, undergraduate, graduate), history of falling (at least in 6 months), comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, kidney diseases, etc.), drug using (how many per day, which one) to be examined by questionnaire and also visual impairment, the use of glasses will be recorded. Motor skills of participants; muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), gait speed (14m), Functional Reach Test will be evaluated. The Mini Mental Test and the Stroop test will be used to evaluate cognitive skills. Single and dual task performance will be evaluated by FSST.

The participants performed the FSST;

1. FSST single: This test is consist of only FSST.
2. FSST motor: FSST is combined with a motor task (carrying a cup of water)
3. FSST cognitive: FSST is combined with a cognitive task (auditory N-back test) As prioritization affects dual task performance, in this study the prioritization will be used in dual task's evaluation. Therefore the dual task will be perform as;

1-With no prioritization 2-With prioritization (focus on balance task) 3-With prioritization (focus on cognitive task) 4-With prioritization (focus on motor task) Note: Balance task is FSST. Cognitive task is auditory N-back test. Motor task is carrying a cup of water.

Statistical Analyses:

The data will be analyzed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 21.0 package program. Descriptive statistical information will be given as mean (X) ± standard deviation (X ± SD) and minimum (min), maximum (max) frequency (f) and percentage (%). The variables will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. When the parametrical test assumptions are obtained, the correlation between the FSST single, FSST motor and FSST cognitive is evaluated by Pearson Correlation Analysis, if the parametrical test assumptions are not obtained, Spearman Correlation Analysis will be used. Multiple linear regression analysis will be applied to determine which potential factor is effective in performance in each FSST test. As a result of the power analysis using the effect size value in the reference study for the study, it was calculated that 85% power could be obtained at 95% confidence level when at least 60 people.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aging

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least to graduate from primary school or ability to read and write
* Mini mental test score\> 24
* Functional reach test score≥15 cm
* Ability to walking independently in the community

Exclusion Criteria

* Living in nursing home
* Presence of central nervous system disease (dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, etc.)
* Polypharmacy (more than 6 medications per day)
* Presence of hearing impairment that cannot be resolved by hearing devices and presence visual impairment that cannot be resolved by hearing aids.
* Presence of musculoskeletal injuries or impairments (NEH limitation, muscle weakness, etc.), which may affect the performance in physical tests
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pamukkale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Suat EREL

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emel TAŞVURAN HORATA, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigator

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pamukkale University

Denizli, Kınıklı, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;90(2):177-86. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090043. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20023000 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

60116787-020/71491

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.