ED50 and ED95 of Isobaric Bupivacaine for Post-Partum Bilateral Tubal Ligation

NCT ID: NCT03779568

Last Updated: 2020-05-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-25

Study Completion Date

2020-04-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal anesthesia is one of the preferred anesthetic techniques for post-partum bilateral tubal ligation (PBTL). Bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for neuraxial anesthesia for post-partum tubal ligation. Typically, hyperbaric bupivacaine would be injected into the spinal (intrathecal) space via a spinal needle; however, ongoing medication shortages have resulted in limited availability on a local and national level. One proposed alternative is isobaric bupivacaine; however, studies investigating its use for post-partum bilateral tubal ligation are limited.

The purpose of this prospective study is to determine the minimal effective dose (ED50 and ED95) of isobaric bupivacaine for adequate anesthesia during post-partum tubal ligation after vaginal delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective study proposes to enroll 40 post-partum women who are undergoing elective post-partum bilateral tubal ligation. The patient will be positioned sitting, and combined spinal anesthesia will be performed at L2-3 or L3-4 level. The presence of an epidural catheter enables the provider to supplement the spinal anesthetic if required. The starting dose of isobaric bupivacaine will be 10 mg based on prior similar studies1,4 and our institution's current practice. The dose of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine was decided by using the up-down sequential method.

The motor block will be graded by a modified Bromage score: Score 1 = complete block, unable to move feet or knees; 2 = almost complete block, able to move feet only; 3 = partial block, just able to move knees; 4 = detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine, full flexion of knees; 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; and 6 = able to perform partial knee bend. The score of 1 or 2 within 10-15 minutes of injection will be evaluated as successful motor block.

The success of the sensory spinal block will be noted when bilateral T6 sensory level to pinprick is attained after 10 mins from the intrathecal drug administration, this is in accordance with previous studies1.

If spinal anesthesia is inadequate, the epidural catheter will be dosed up for supplementation. All observations, including block characteristics and the associated outcome (i.e., adequate or inadequate block), will be evaluated by a dedicated anesthesia provider.

Intraoperative adverse effects, such as hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting, pruritus, or shivering were noted. Hypotension is defined as a decrease of more than 20% in basal systolic blood pressure within 30 minutes of intrathecal injection. The management of blood pressure including dose of pressor: phenylephrine and ephedrine will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The use of pressor and anti-emetics will also be recorded.

The study will be take place in standard clinical context. The study does not deviate from our current practice, which includes the use of combined spinal anesthesia where the epidural catheter is available if supplemental local anesthetic is required.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dose adjustment of bupivacaine

Patient will receive isobaric bupivacaine based on previous patient experience.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dose adjustment of bupivacaine

Intervention Type OTHER

Spinal bupivacaine dose will be adjusted according to previous patient experience.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dose adjustment of bupivacaine

Spinal bupivacaine dose will be adjusted according to previous patient experience.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Spinal bupivacaine dose adjustment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 and older
* Patients undergoing elective post-partum bilateral tubal ligation after vaginal delivery
* Patients receiving spinal epidural anesthesia with combination of bupivacaine and fentanyl

Exclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score \>3,
* Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia
* Patients in whom a combined spinal epidural cannot be performed
* Body mass index \>40 kg/m2
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics and fentanyl
* Severe liver, kidney or respiratory disease.
* Inability to understand the study protocol
* Refusal to provide written consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Seema Dave, MPH

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Parkland Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU 082018-026

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESP Block for Post Cesarean Analgesia
NCT05664958 COMPLETED PHASE4