Impact of Nasoseptal Flap Harvest Technique on Olfaction Following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03773705

Last Updated: 2019-03-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-25

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pituitary tumours have an estimated prevalence of 20% in the general population and the number of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas is increasing with time. When symptomatic, the standard of care required for pituitary adenomas is resection through an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. There is however significant olfactory dysfunction following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with approximately 23% of patients reporting some degree of worsening in their sense of smell in the postoperative period.

Pedicled nasoseptal flaps are used to repair skull base defects following resection of skull base tumours. The superior incision is placed in close proximity to olfactory mucosa. Currently, these flaps are raised either with the use of electrocautery or scalpel. The use of electrocautery in surgery has provided surgeons with greater hemostasis when compared to a scalpel. This is of utmost importance in many regions of the head \& neck where highly vascularized tissue results in difficulties achieving adequate hemostasis and therefore limiting view of the surgical field. However, the use of electrocautery increases thermal damage to surrounding tissue and impairs wound healing when compared to a scalpel.

Although the transmission of thermal energy via electrocautery to adjacent mucosa containing olfactory epithelium may theoretically contribute to olfactory disturbances, no prospective randomized controlled trials have yet examined the impact of these two different techniques on postoperative olfactory function. The purpose of this research study is to determine the effects, if any, of electrocautery versus scalpel on olfaction in raising the nasoseptal flap for repairing skull base defects following transphenoidal surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pedicled nasoseptal flaps are used to repair skull base defects following endoscopic transphenoidal surgery. The superior incision is placed in close proximity to olfactory mucosa. Currently, these flaps are raised either with the use of electrocautery or scalpel. While it is hypothesized that the olfactory mucosa is at greater risk of thermal injury with the use of electrocautery, no prospective multi-center studies have examined the impact of these two different techniques on postoperative olfactory function.

Patients will be recruited through the Otolaryngology-Head \& Neck Surgery clinics. Based on previous studies in a North American population, a 10% change in UPSIT score was considered to be significant. With an alpha error set to 0.05, a beta of 0.8 and an effect size of 1 standard deviation, a sample size of 20 was calculated.

After obtaining consent for enrolment into the study, each patient will undergo either: (1) electrocautery or (2) scalpel in the elevation of nasoseptal flaps based on primary surgeon preference. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) will be used for baseline testing of olfactory function in all enrolled patients. Postoperatively, all enrolled patients will be seen in follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months' time, at which point the UPSIT will be administered for testing of postoperative olfactory function.

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used to determine differences between UPSIT scores pre- and postoperatively. Results of p\<0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Linear regression will be used to examine relationships between UPSIT scores and other variables collected (e.g., demographic data, size/type of pituitary tumour, length of nasoseptal flap).

Given that approximately 23% of all patients who undergo endoscopic transphenoidal surgery note some degree of worsening in their sense of smell following surgery, a prospective multi-center study comparing the two techniques would provide impetus to pursue one strategy over another in order to maintain an important sense, olfaction. Through optimizing preservation of olfactory mucosa during endoscopic skull base surgeries, patients' likelihood of not detecting environmental hazards (e.g., smoke, gas, other poisonous materials) will be reduced and, equally as important, their quality of life would be improved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pituitary Tumor Surgery Olfactory Nerve Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electrocautery group

Electrocautery used to raise pediclued nasoseptal flaps to repair skull based defects following endoscopic transphenoidal surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Electrocautery versus scalpel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electrocautery versus scalpel in the elevation of nasoseptal flaps following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

Scalpel group

Scalpel used to raise pediclued nasoseptal flaps to repair skull based defects following endoscopic transphenoidal surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Electrocautery versus scalpel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Electrocautery versus scalpel in the elevation of nasoseptal flaps following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electrocautery versus scalpel

Electrocautery versus scalpel in the elevation of nasoseptal flaps following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (age ≥18 years)
* Patients with tumours of the pituitary gland electively scheduled for endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery with nasoseptal flap coverage

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented evidence of sinonasal disease on either nasal endoscopy or radiography
* Patients with a clinical history of asthma and/or sinonasal disease
* Previous sinus surgery
* Previous skull base surgery
* History of pre-existing hyposmia or anosmia
* Use of medication(s) known to alter sense of smell at time of test
* UPSIT scores \<5 indicating a functional component to alteration in olfaction
* Development of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak necessitating re-entry into the operative field containing the nasoseptal flap
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Unity Health Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Lee

Head, Division of Rhinology, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Unity Health Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

John Lee, MD

Role: CONTACT

416-864-5306

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Andrea Figol, MSc

Role: primary

416-864-6060 ext. 6591

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.