Inferior Submucosal Turbinectomy Versus Blunt Turbinectomy for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy

NCT ID: NCT00651092

Last Updated: 2008-04-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare endoscopic submucosal inferior turbinectomy to blunt turbinectomy in terms of subjective and objective parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The two methods of nasal inferior turbinectomy are well popularized and in use for long periods of time. Endoscopic submucosal inferior turbinectomy is performed in our hospital and blunt turbinectomy is performed usually in privat clinics outside the hospital where there is no endoscopic equipment. We will examine both subjective (QOL questionaire) and objective parameters(rhinomanometry- a non invasive method to evaluate nasal airflow, saccharine test, nasal endoscopy) in our comparison of the outcome of these two methods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bilateral Inferior Turbinates Hypertrophy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

turbinectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A1

since the two methods of turbinectomy are in used on a regular basis there is no way to perform double blind study- both the surgeon and the patients are well aware of the operation they are about to go. we just compare several parameters in patients who are anyway about to undergo an operation in a specific method that is used by their surgeon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bilateral nasal inferior turbinectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the operation is performed endonasally under general or local anesthesia, the inferior turbinates are resected and removed

A2

the resection of the inferior turbinates will be performed endonasally with an endoscopical instruments

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endoscopic submucosal resection of the inferior turbinates

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgery of the inferior turbinates- endonasally with endoscopic instruments and by performing submucosal resection of the nasal turbinates

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bilateral nasal inferior turbinectomy

the operation is performed endonasally under general or local anesthesia, the inferior turbinates are resected and removed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

endoscopic submucosal resection of the inferior turbinates

surgery of the inferior turbinates- endonasally with endoscopic instruments and by performing submucosal resection of the nasal turbinates

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

inferior conchectomy submucosal conchectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patients above 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* can not answer a written questionaire
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Soroka University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

soroke university medical center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

nili segal, md

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

soroka university medical center beer sheva israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

nili segal, md

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +972544268202

Email: [email protected]

moshe puterman, md

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +97286400521

Email: [email protected]

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fradis M, Golz A, Danino J, Gershinski M, Goldsher M, Gaitini L, Malatskey S, Armush W. Inferior turbinectomy versus submucosal diathermy for inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000 Nov;109(11):1040-5. doi: 10.1177/000348940010901109.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11089995 (View on PubMed)

Williams HO, Fisher EW, Golding-Wood DG. 'Two-stage turbinectomy': sequestration of the inferior turbinate following submucosal diathermy. J Laryngol Otol. 1991 Jan;105(1):14-6. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100114707.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1999659 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

sor466208ctil

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id