Comparison of Surgical Approach to Endoscopic Pituitary Adenoma Resection

NCT ID: NCT01689064

Last Updated: 2014-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant difference in sinonasal disease specific quality of life and utility scores between patients undergoing the posterior septectomy or Stamm approach during endoscopic pituitary adenoma resection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pituitary adenoma's represent 10 to 25% of all central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms and have an estimated population prevalence of 94 per 100,000. Asymptomatic adenomas go largely undetected since there is no screening protocol implemented with the purpose for early identification. Asymptomatic adenomas can be detected incidentally on CNS imaging for other indications in approximately 10% of studies and rarely require surgical intervention. In 2011, the Endocrine Society published practice guidelines on the management of pituitary incidentalomas and provided the surgical indications. Incidental microadenoma's (\< 10 mm) rarely need surgical intervention, however, incidental macroadenoma's (\> 10 mm) often required surgical resection due to the proximity of the optic nerves and chiasm.

Most symptomatic pituitary adenomas require transnasal transsphenoid surgical resection. Due to the potential for hormone secretion and location to vital structures such as the optic chiasm/nerves, carotid artery, and cavernous sinus, management of symptomatic pituitary adenomas often require a multi-disciplinary team involving neurosurgery, otolaryngology, neuroophthalmology, and endocrinology. Traditionally the microscope was used for visualization during pituitary tumor surgery, however with recent technologic advances, the endoscopic approach has largely replaced the microscopic approach. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis compared the microscopic and endoscopic approaches and have demonstrated that the endoscopic approach results in a significant reduction in the rate of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) leak, improved tumor resection, improved patient comfort, and reduced hospital length of stay. Furthermore, the endoscopic approach appears to provide an overall cost savings compared to the microscopic approach.

Several recent studies have demonstrated that the endoscopic approach for pituitary adenoma resection results in improved disease-specific quality of life (QoL) and general QoL. All studies have utilized the posterior septectomy approach which involves removing the posterior nasal septum to create a common posterior nasal cavity. The open posterior nasal cavity provides excellent surgical access to the sphenoid sinus and pituitary gland. Disadvantages of the posterior septectomy approach include the permanent posterior septal perforation which may predispose to postoperative crusting and epistaxis. A recent article by Stamm et al. described a novel endoscopic approach whereby the posterior septal mucosa is preserved while still providing excellent access to the sphenoid. The primary advantage of this approach is preventing a posterior septal defect, however disadvantages include being a more challenging technique and the potential for reduced surgical visualization. Furthermore, there is still a risk of a septal perforation due to intraoperative trauma and significant postoperative crusting which often develops along the surface of the healing septal mucosa. Both endoscopic approaches have inherent advantages and disadvantages and there has been no study comparing these approaches. Surgeons performing endoscopic pituitary tumor resections utilize both approaches and neither is considered the standard of care.

The purpose of this randomized, single-blinded study is to determine the clinical outcomes between the posterior septectomy and Stamm approach for endoscopic pituitary adenoma resection. We hypothesize that there will be no difference in disease-specific QoL and general QoL between the two surgical approaches.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pituitary Adenoma Posterior Septectomy Stamm Approach Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Posterior Septectomy

Patient will be randomized to a study arm. The patient will be blinded to the approach. The surgeon will have performed at least 10 procedures previous for each approach. The surgeon will maintain the following surgical practives: preservation of both middle turbinates, preservation of one superior turbinate (to minimize olfactory injury), elevation of a nasoseptal flap, the use of a combination of gelform, surgicel and nasapore dissolvable spacer placed within the surgical defect. These practices are all standard of care. Patient will start Neilmed high volume low pressure saline irrigation three times daily starting on post operative day five. Patients will receive prophylactic antibiotics for fourteen days post operatively.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Posterior Septectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stamm Approach

Patient will be randomized a study arm. The patient will be blinded to the approach. The surgeon will have performed at least 10 procedures previous for each approach. The surgeon will maintain the following surgical practives: preservation of both middle turbinates, preservation of one superior turbinate (to minimize olfactory injury), elevation of a nasoseptal flap, the use of a combination of gelform, surgicel and nasapore dissolvable spacer placed within the surgical defect. These practices are all standard of care. Patient will start Neilmed high volume low pressure saline irrigation three times daily starting on post operative day five. Patients will receive prophylactic antibiotics for fourteen days post operatively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stamm Approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stamm Approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Posterior Septectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years old
* Diagnosis of a pituitary adenoma requiring resection defined as pituitary lesion with any of the following:

1. Neuroimaging or clinical evidence of apoplexy
2. Decline in central visual acuity worse than (best-corrected) Snellen equivalent of 20/25 in either eye
3. clinically significant visual field loss as determined by Humphrey or Goldmann perimetry
4. Clinically significant cranial nerve deficit
5. Clinically relevant neuroendocrine deficit
6. Intolerance of optimal medical management
* Patient electing endoscopic resection approach

Exclusion Criteria

* Concurrent chronic rhinosinusitis
* Revision pituitary adenoma resections
* Severe medical co-morbidities with the inability to undergo general anesthesia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Luke Rudmik

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luke Rudmik, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A. High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege, Belgium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Dec;91(12):4769-75. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1668. Epub 2006 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16968795 (View on PubMed)

Hall WA, Luciano MG, Doppman JL, Patronas NJ, Oldfield EH. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in normal human volunteers: occult adenomas in the general population. Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 15;120(10):817-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-10-199405150-00001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8154641 (View on PubMed)

Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, Molitch ME, Montori VM, Post KD, Vance ML; Endocrine Society. Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Apr;96(4):894-904. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1048.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21474686 (View on PubMed)

Rotenberg B, Tam S, Ryu WH, Duggal N. Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2010 Jul;120(7):1292-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.20949.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20578228 (View on PubMed)

DeKlotz TR, Chia SH, Lu W, Makambi KH, Aulisi E, Deeb Z. Meta-analysis of endoscopic versus sublabial pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope. 2012 Mar;122(3):511-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.22479. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22252670 (View on PubMed)

Oosmanally N, Paul JE, Zanation AM, Ewend MG, Senior BA, Ebert CS Jr. Comparative analysis of cost of endoscopic endonasal minimally invasive and sublabial-transseptal approaches to the pituitary. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 Jul-Aug;1(4):242-9. doi: 10.1002/alr.20048. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22287427 (View on PubMed)

Graham SM, Iseli TA, Karnell LH, Clinger JD, Hitchon PW, Greenlee JD. Endoscopic approach for pituitary surgery improves rhinologic outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009 Sep;118(9):630-5. doi: 10.1177/000348940911800905.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19810602 (View on PubMed)

Suberman TA, Zanation AM, Ewend MG, Senior BA, Ebert CS Jr. Sinonasal quality-of-life before and after endoscopic, endonasal, minimally invasive pituitary surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011 May-Jun;1(3):161-6. doi: 10.1002/alr.20029. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22287366 (View on PubMed)

Stamm AC, Pignatari S, Vellutini E, Harvey RJ, Nogueira JF Jr. A novel approach allowing binostril work to the sphenoid sinus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;138(4):531-2. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.031. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18359368 (View on PubMed)

Little AS, Jahnke H, Nakaji P, Milligan J, Chapple K, White WL. The anterior skull base nasal inventory (ASK nasal inventory): a clinical tool for evaluating rhinological outcomes after endonasal surgery for pituitary and cranial base lesions. Pituitary. 2012 Dec;15(4):513-7. doi: 10.1007/s11102-011-0358-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22038032 (View on PubMed)

Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19793277 (View on PubMed)

Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8628042 (View on PubMed)

Wright ED, Agrawal S. Impact of perioperative systemic steroids on surgical outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis: evaluation with the novel Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Laryngoscope. 2007 Nov;117(11 Pt 2 Suppl 115):1-28. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814842f8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18075447 (View on PubMed)

Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav. 1984 Mar;32(3):489-502. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90269-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6463130 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E-24588

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id