Nudging for Vaccination : Efficacity and Acceptability Among Medical Students

NCT ID: NCT03768596

Last Updated: 2019-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-07

Study Completion Date

2018-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nudge is a set of methods aimed at helping people adopt a behavior by a gentle prompt, conscious or not. Classically, Nudges rely on heuristics and cognitive biases. These methods have been studied for years in social psychology and are receiving renewed attention since the awarding of the Nobel Prize in economics to Richard Thaler for his work on the application of Nudge to the economy.

Health professionals are very inadequately vaccinated (25 to 45% of the population). Some studies have shown that a Nudge based on intent implementation can significantly increase vaccination coverage. However, few studies evaluate the acceptability of Nudge or its application to health professionals.

The investigators sought to apply a Nudge based on availability heuristics to health professionals, in order to evaluate its effectiveness and terms of behavior adoption (influenza vaccination) and its acceptability.

The investigator's hypothesis is that Nudging is both effective and acceptable and that people found nudging more acceptable if they have been exposed to a nudge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators asked residents in general medicine to pass a questionnaire including a Nudge. This Nudge was the influenza vaccine prescription form accompanied on the back of the telephone numbers of the occupational health centers of the hospitals where residents were on probation.

The interns of the group "Nudge" saw at the end of their questionnaire the following statement: "If you are not vaccinated against the flu so far, you can get the form stapled to this questionnaire, it will allow you to get the vaccine in pharmacy. On the back you will also find practical information about immunization services at your place of training. " A group will receive an implemented Nudge questionnaire, a group will receive a questionnaire without Nudge and a control group will not be asked. (Phase 1) The 3 groups will receive a month later a questionnaire evaluating the effectiveness in terms of immunization coverage, and the acceptability of the Nudge, for oneself and for others. (Phase 2) The control group will only receive the Phase 2 questionnaire to control the Hawthorne effect.

The difference between the 3 groups will consist exclusively in the exposure of the participants to:

* A questionnaire on their attitude (opinion) towards vaccination;
* The numbers of the occupational health vaccination centers of their places of training;
* The flu vaccine prescription form, to be signed and stamped by a doctor (also already freely available on the internet)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza, Human Vaccination; Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

one group receives a form with the nudge, one group receives the same form without nudge and another group doesn't receive any form
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

In the first pat of the study, participants are unaware of the fact we are trying to nudge them. In the second part, they are explained and asked what they feel about nudging

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nudge

receiving nudge and form

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nudge

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Influenza Vaccine Prescription Form accompanied on the back of telephone numbers of occupational health centers of different hospitals where interns are likely to be on probation.

vaccination form

Intervention Type OTHER

a form about vaccination

No nudge

receiving the same form without nudge (only questions about their opinion/attitudes about vaccination)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

vaccination form

Intervention Type OTHER

a form about vaccination

No intervention

receiving no nudge nor form

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nudge

Influenza Vaccine Prescription Form accompanied on the back of telephone numbers of occupational health centers of different hospitals where interns are likely to be on probation.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

vaccination form

a form about vaccination

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* medical students

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Adriaan Barbaroux

INDIV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adriaan Barbaroux

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Isabelle MILHABET, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

LAPCOS-UCA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UNSA

Nice, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Barbaroux A, Benoit L, Raymondie RA, Milhabet I. Nudging health care workers towards a flu shot: reminders are accepted but not necessarily effective. A randomized controlled study among residents in general practice in France. Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):410-415. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab001.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33506858 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A02939-46

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ABarbaroux

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

COVID-19 Messaging for Vaccination
NCT05182554 COMPLETED NA
Views on COVID-19 and Vaccination
NCT04706403 COMPLETED NA