Improving Physician Vaccine Recommendation Using Social Norms, Trust, and Presumptive Language
NCT ID: NCT05957393
Last Updated: 2024-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
447 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-21
2024-04-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nudging for Vaccination : Efficacity and Acceptability Among Medical Students
NCT03768596
Views on COVID-19 and Vaccination
NCT04706403
Efficacy of Communication Modalities for Promoting Flu Shots
NCT05509270
Enhancing Empathy in Medical Communication Through Perspective-Taking
NCT00861991
The Influence of Doctor-patient Communication on Treatment Expectation, Placebo and Nocebo Response
NCT03949816
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Quantity (present) x Quality (present)
Participants will receive a social norm-based message (for quantity) and will learn the AIMS method, a trust-building method using presumptive language (for quality).
Quantity of vaccination recommendations
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Quality of vaccination recommendations
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Quantity (present) x Quality (absent)
Participants will receive a social norm-based message (for quantity).
Quantity of vaccination recommendations
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Quantity (absent) x Quality (present)
Participants will learn the AIMS method, a trust-building method using presumptive language (for quality).
Quality of vaccination recommendations
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Quantity (absent) x Quality (absent)
Control: Participants in this condition will receive general information about vaccines, including vaccine principles, uptake barriers, and guidelines. This information will come directly from the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) website.
Control
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Quantity of vaccination recommendations
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Quality of vaccination recommendations
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Control
The survey contains a messaging intervention using a 2x2 randomized factorial design, where the investigators attempt to increase the quantity and/or quality of physician and APP vaccination recommendations (Quantity (present vs. absent) x Quality (present vs. absent)).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be in a position to be authorized to recommend vaccines to patients in their official professional capacities/responsibilities.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dan Ariely, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
(Any and all facilities) - The study team ask(s)/(ed) professional contacts, friends, and family members who are employed at various US Institutions to forward the recruitment announcement message via their respective networks
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Health System (all locations)
Durham, North Carolina, United States
(Any and all facilities) - Participants are recruited via market research company "Survey Healthcare Global"
BrasÃlia, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00113696
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.