Efficacy and Safety of Thermic Devices in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

NCT ID: NCT03767530

Last Updated: 2025-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dry eye syndrome is a common eye disease that affects 1 to 2 out of 10 persons around the planet. One common cause of this disease is the meibomian gland dysfunction. Meibomian glands are very small glands located at the rim of the eyelids that produce an oily substance that prevents the evaporation of tears. When these glands are compromised, the tear film evaporates quickly and the eyes dry up. This disease presents as eye irritation, foreign body sensation, inflammation, etc. The treatment of choice for MGD is eyelid massage and warm compresses 2 times a day. However, these treatments not always work perfectly, and as a result, patients find it hard to follow doctor's orders. Another kind of treatment is thermal therapy. There are several devices that are designed to apply heat on the eyelids, such as Lipiflow, MiBo Thermoflo, and Blephasteam. In this study, we want to find out whether thermal therapy with MiBo Thermoflo works better than warm compresses and eyelid massage use in the treatment of dry eye caused by MGD. To do this, we will select several patients and will assign them randomly to either the group with thermal therapy with MiBo Thermoflo or to the group with warm compresses and eyelid massage. The Mibo group will receive 3 sessions of thermal therapy at 2 weeks interval and the control group warm compresses and eyelid massage 2 times per day. All subjects will have a follow up of 24 weeks and we will compare results for both groups at the end of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dry eye syndrome is considered one of the most important ophthalmologic diseases, affecting 10 to 20% of the general population. Of these, 3.7% to 70% of cases are due to meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). MGD is a chronic diffuse disease characterized by terminal duct obstruction and/or qualitative/quantitative changes in gland secretion. This causes a disruption in the tear film, ocular irritation symptom, inflammation, and ocular surface symptoms. The gold standard for the treatment of meibomian dysfunction is the use of warm compresses and eyelid massage 2 times a day. These have variable results and consequently patient's adherence to treatment is low. An alternative treatment is the use of thermal therapy devices such as Lipiflow, MiBo Thermoflo, and Blephasteam. The objective of this study is to determine if the thermal device MiBo Thermoflo is more effective than warm compresses and eyelid massage in the treatment of dry eye secondary to MGD. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: the Mibo group will receive 3 sessions of thermal therapy at 2 weeks interval and the control group warm compresses and eyelid massage 2 times per day. All subjects will have follow up of 24 weeks and we will compare results for both groups at the end of the study. During the protocol patients in both groups will continue with their standard treatment for dry eye as needed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All subjects will be ophthalmologically evaluated before treatment and at weeks 8, 16 and 24. Subjects will be randomly assigned into 2 study groups. Mibo group will have 3 sessions (basal, week 2, week 4) of thermal therapy with Mibo Thermoflo in both eyes. The control group will use warm compresses and eyelid massage 2 times per day in both eyes. At the week 16 control group will also have 3 sessions of Mibo therapy at 2 weeks interval.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Not blinded study.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mibo Thermoflo (thermal device)

3 sessions at 2 weeks interval (basal, week 2, week 4)of 11 minutes per eye of thermal therapy with Mibo Thermoflo.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mibo Thermoflo

Intervention Type DEVICE

Thermal therapy with Mibo Thermoflo for 11 minutes per eye, during each session.

Warm compresses and eyelid massage

2 times per day, 11 minutes per eye.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Warm compresses and eyelid massage

Intervention Type OTHER

Warm compresses plus eyelid massage 2 times per day 11 minutes per eye.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mibo Thermoflo

Thermal therapy with Mibo Thermoflo for 11 minutes per eye, during each session.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Warm compresses and eyelid massage

Warm compresses plus eyelid massage 2 times per day 11 minutes per eye.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed with:

* Dry eye syndrome with meibomian gland dysfunction alone or in combination of other type of dry eye.
* Patients who were previously treated with eyelid massages and warm compresses without any improvement.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women.
* History of ocular surgery within three months prior to inclusion.
* History of trauma, infection or inflammation within three months prior to inclusion.
* Contact lens use in the last week before inclusion.
* Patients with active ocular allergic disease.
* Patient with microbial keratitis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karim Mohamed-Noriega

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karim Mohamed-Noriega, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Departamento de Oftalmologia, Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Departamento de Oftalmologia, Hospital Universitario "Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez"

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Karim Mohamed-Noriega, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Karim Mohamed-Noriega, M.D.

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arita R, Morishige N, Shirakawa R, Sato Y, Amano S. Effects of Eyelid Warming Devices on Tear Film Parameters in Normal Subjects and Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Ocul Surf. 2015 Oct;13(4):321-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26031204 (View on PubMed)

Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28736335 (View on PubMed)

Foulks, G. N., Lemp, M., Jester, J., Sutphin, J., Murube, J., & Novack, G. (2007). report of the international dry eye workshop (DEWS). Ocul Surf, 5(2), 65-204. Foulks, G. N., Lemp, M., Jester, J., Sutphin, J., Murube, J., & Novack, G. (2007). Report of the international dry eye workshop (DEWS). Ocul Surf, 5(2), 65-204.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Geerling G, Tauber J, Baudouin C, Goto E, Matsumoto Y, O'Brien T, Rolando M, Tsubota K, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on management and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):2050-64. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997g. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21450919 (View on PubMed)

Hom M, De Land P. Prevalence and severity of symptomatic dry eyes in Hispanics. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Mar;82(3):206-8. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000156310.45736.fa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15767875 (View on PubMed)

Johnson ME, Murphy PJ. Changes in the tear film and ocular surface from dry eye syndrome. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004 Jul;23(4):449-74. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.04.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15219877 (View on PubMed)

Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Dana R, Deng SX, Dong PN, Geerling G, Hida RY, Liu Y, Seo KY, Tauber J, Wakamatsu TH, Xu J, Wolffsohn JS, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28736343 (View on PubMed)

Kenrick CJ, Alloo SS. The Limitation of Applying Heat to the External Lid Surface: A Case of Recalcitrant Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 16;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.1159/000455087. eCollection 2017 Jan-Apr.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28203190 (View on PubMed)

Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, Foulks GN, Sullivan BD. Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: a retrospective study. Cornea. 2012 May;31(5):472-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318225415a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22378109 (View on PubMed)

Mori A, Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Fujishima H, Oguchi Y, Tsubota K. Disposable eyelid-warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov-Dec;47(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/s0021-5155(03)00142-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14636848 (View on PubMed)

Nelson JD, Shimazaki J, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Craig JP, McCulley JP, Den S, Foulks GN. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1930-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997b. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21450914 (View on PubMed)

Pult H, Riede-Pult BH, Purslow C. A comparison of an eyelid-warming device to traditional compress therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jul;89(7):E1035-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31825c3479.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22729167 (View on PubMed)

Qiao J, Yan X. Emerging treatment options for meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1797-803. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S33182. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24043929 (View on PubMed)

Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):1994-2005. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997e. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21450917 (View on PubMed)

Wang MT, Jaitley Z, Lord SM, Craig JP. Comparison of Self-applied Heat Therapy for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Sep;92(9):e321-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000601.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25955642 (View on PubMed)

Wang X, Lu X, Yang J, Wei R, Yang L, Zhao S, Wang X. Evaluation of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Teenagers with Myopia through Noninvasive Keratograph. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:6761206. doi: 10.1155/2016/6761206. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26881059 (View on PubMed)

Stetson G. & Kenrick Ch. (2018). A comparision of four warm compress devices. The Association of Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). Honolulu Hawaii. 953-B0131.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OF18-00006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Management
NCT03652337 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA