Mechanisms of Light-based Therapies for Dry Eye Disease

NCT ID: NCT06004895

Last Updated: 2025-07-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-25

Study Completion Date

2025-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dry eye disease is a common condition affecting millions worldwide and costing millions in healthcare due to reduced work productivity and quality of life. The disruption of oil glands in our eyelids known as Meibomian glands, which produce the oily layer of our tears to protect it from evaporating, is one of the most common contributors of dry eye disease. Much effort has been put into developing effective treatments for this condition as new treatments are constantly being introduced to the market.

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate how proven light-based therapies work in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption. These therapies include intense-pulsed light therapy (IPL) which uses a series of light flashes on the facial skin surface, and low-level light therapy (LLLT) which uses a mask with a series of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to warm the body cells. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. What are the short- and long-term changes associated with these treatments on the eyelids and surface of the eyes?
2. Does LLLT alone work better than IPL+LLLT in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption?

Participants with dry eye disease and oil gland disruption will receive four treatments with these light-based therapies each separated by two to three weeks apart, and followed up two to three weeks and three months after the final treatment session. One eye of the participant will receive intense pulsed light together with low-level light therapy, while the other eye will receive only low-level light therapy with a sham intense pulsed light treatment so that the researchers can compare if clinical signs and symptoms improve in one eye more than the other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will be a randomized, double-masked, paired-eye clinical study to assess the potential difference in impact between the two treatment modalities. Each eye of the participant will be randomized to receive either IPL+LLLT or sham IPL+LLLT. The whole study involves a total of 6 visits (consisting of 4 treatment visits, and 2 follow-up visits). All visits will be conducted at the Aston Dry Eye Clinic in Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndromes Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One eye of the participant is randomised to receiving IPL and LLLT, while the other eye of the same participant will receive sham intense pulsed light therapy and low-level light therapy.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Actual IPL and LLLT

IPL and LLLT will be administered using the Espansione Group Ltd Eye-light unit. Five pulses of IPL will be administered along the lower lid region of the eye after the Pult meiboscore and Fitzpatrick skin grading has been entered into the unit. LLLT consisting of a wearable facial mask with red LEDs is then administered for 15 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Actual IPL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Five light pulses along lower lid region of one eye of the participant ranging from 59 to 69 Joules (J) over an area of 2.5cm by 4.5cm for each pulse

LLLT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mask with LEDs transferring a total of about 32 J/cm\^2 of energy to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed

Sham IPL and LLLT

Sham IPL will be administered by placing a separate empty IPL cartridge on the lower eyelid regions of the patient's other eye while a working IPL cartridge (Espansione Group Ltd Eye-light unit) simulates a light pulse pointed away from the patient's face, after entering the Pult meiboscore and Fitzpatrick skin grading into the unit. Five simulated pulses will be administered. LLLT consisting of a wearable facial mask with red LEDs is then administered for 15 minutes.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham IPL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Simulated five light pulses along lower lid region of the other eye of the same participant

LLLT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mask with LEDs transferring a total of about 32 J/cm\^2 of energy to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Actual IPL

Five light pulses along lower lid region of one eye of the participant ranging from 59 to 69 Joules (J) over an area of 2.5cm by 4.5cm for each pulse

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham IPL

Simulated five light pulses along lower lid region of the other eye of the same participant

Intervention Type DEVICE

LLLT

Mask with LEDs transferring a total of about 32 J/cm\^2 of energy to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals with dry eye disease symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire (OSDI) score ≥ 13 or Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ5) score \> 6) and signs (tear film instability measured with non-invasive tear break-up time \< 10 s or ocular surface damage measured using special dyes placed on the front surface of the eyes that temporarily stains any aggravated or damaged cells: \> 5 corneal spots, \> 9 conjunctival spots or lid margin staining ≥ 2mm in length and ≥ 25% in width) (Wolffsohn et al., 2017)
* Individuals need to also have Meibomian gland dysfunction. The diagnosis of Meibomian gland dysfunction depends on how many of 5 glands in the central lower eyelid can express oil, and the quality of the oil. A diagnosis is made if there is decreased expressibility (grade 1-3 on the Pflugfelder scale) and reduced quality of oil (grade 1-3 on Bron scale). Any presence of gland blockage and/or loss of oil glands grade 2 to grade 4 of either eyelid \[Pult and Reide-Pult, 2013\]) will also justify a diagnosis of Meibomian gland dysfunction
* Age ≥ 18 years, male or female
* Able to provide written consent in English
* Able to attend multiple visits (4 treatment visits) and followed up for 2 weeks and 3 months after final treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Contraindications to IPL treatment (Individuals with darker skin types - Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI, photosensitive epilepsy, tattoos, implants, electrical or acoustic prosthetics, semi-permanent make-up, pigmented lesions or skin cancer in the treatment area, pacemakers, use of photosensitising medication the past 3 months or during treatment period)
* Facial or ocular IPL or LLLT treatment within the past 6 months or during study period in addition to those provided in the study
* Use of topical medical eyedrops in the past 3 months or during study period
* Contact lens wear in the past 2 weeks or during study period
* Systemic conditions that can cause dry eye disease or corneal nerve loss including diabetes and Sjögren's syndrome
* Other active ocular surface diseases or history of ocular surgery or corneal infections
* Individuals with 1 eye
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aston University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeremy Chiang

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James S Wolffsohn, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Aston University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aston Dry Eye Clinic

Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, Amano S, Paugh JR, Pearce EI, Yee R, Yokoi N, Arita R, Dogru M. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):2006-49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997f. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21450918 (View on PubMed)

Pult H, Riede-Pult B. Comparison of subjective grading and objective assessment in meibography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Feb;36(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.074. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23108007 (View on PubMed)

Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, Djalilian A, Dogru M, Dumbleton K, Gupta PK, Karpecki P, Lazreg S, Pult H, Sullivan BD, Tomlinson A, Tong L, Villani E, Yoon KC, Jones L, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):539-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28736342 (View on PubMed)

Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10815152 (View on PubMed)

Chalmers RL, Begley CG, Caffery B. Validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Apr;33(2):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20093066 (View on PubMed)

Arita R, Minoura I, Morishige N, Shirakawa R, Fukuoka S, Asai K, Goto T, Imanaka T, Nakamura M. Development of Definitive and Reliable Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27345733 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HLS21118

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.