Randomized Study on the Evaluation of the Regular Practice of Standardized Postures Stretching Postural® in Secondary Prevention of Low Back Pains During Pregnancy.

NCT ID: NCT03765853

Last Updated: 2022-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lower back pain (LBP) during pregnancy is a frequent syndrome: it concerns two thirds of pregnant women. This complaint isn't routinely searched for and therefore underdiagnosed. Furthermore, few solutions are given to these women in order to reduce their pain, and indirectly to improve everyday life. What's more, LBP is the cause of many work interruptions. Physical exercise during pregnancy is recommended by the National College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians for low risk pregnancies. Several techniques have proven to be efficient.

The main objective of our study is to assess the benefit of regular practice of standardised Stretching Postural® postures in patients presenting "de novo" lower back pain during pregnancy.

The Stretching Postural® technique comprises of static postures involving muscular contractions and stretches. This allows the strengthening of the postural muscles, including the paravertebral muscles. After a short learning period, postures can be done autonomously by the patients. The postures are adaptable to each and everyone's morphology and physical limitations.

Our study is an open, prospective, randomised monocentric superiority trial in parallel branches involving major patients during low risk pregnancies. These women suffer from "de novo" lower back pain during the second and third trimesters of their pregnancies. Each patient will be randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups:

* Stretching Postural® group (group A): usual prevention methods (ergonomic education) and Stretching Postural® postures.
* "Control" group (group B): usual prevention methods only.

Patients presenting "de novo" LBP are included in the study after a routine consult then randomly separated into two groups. During the initial consult, the physician assesses inclusion and judgement criteria, collects informed consent from the patients and teaches them the usual prevention methods as well as, concerning group A, Stretching Postural® postures. Computerized support agendas are given in order to improve observance.

Patients are evaluated at day 0 (initial evaluation), after 4 weeks (intermediate) and after 8 weeks (final), according to the main judgment criterion, as well as on secondary pain criteria by the Concise Pain Questionnaire, on their quality of life, the rate of work interruptions and their satisfaction rate. Neonatal outcome is collected at birth. Intermediate phone interviews will allow psychological support and improve observance. Inclusion is scheduled to last 22 months; each subject will be followed during a period of 2 months. The total duration of the study is 2 years.

Expected results are a decrease in back pain and an improvement of the quality of life in group A. Decrease in pain scale, equivalent to overall pain during the last week between the two groups will be our main judgment criterion. In order to detect a difference of 1.5 pain scale points (on a scale from 1 to 10) with an alpha risk of 5%, 80% magnitude and a standard deviation of 2, 56 subjects are necessary; 28 in each group.

Perspectives: This study will allow for a better diagnosis of lower back pain during pregnancy, and, consequently, for the implementation of routine means of care such as collective or private lessons in Stretching Postural® and the supply of personalised prevention documents.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stretching Postural®

Group Type OTHER

Physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual prevention methods (ergonomic education) and Stretching Postural® postures.

Control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physiotherapy

Usual prevention methods (ergonomic education) and Stretching Postural® postures.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant patients between 15 and 32 amenorrhea at the beginning of the study
* Absence of pre existing major lower back pain
* Back or lumbar pain and/or sacroiliac
* Good understanding of French
* BMI before pregnancy \<35
* singletons
* Low risk pregnancy : no maternal and foetal major pathology (absence of professional risk, no antecedent of obstetric pathology, major gynecological pathology, exposure to toxic, important medical risk factors, infectious disease)
* Possibility to listen a computer audio
* Patient having accepted to participate to the study and having signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Physical handicap not allowing the change of positions in autonomy
* Severe cardiac, lung,hepatic, rheumatological pathology
* Sciatic without LPB (Low Back Pain), motor deficit or slipped disc
* High risk pregnancy
* maternal plan : antecedent of late miscarriage, cervix cerclage, disease having an impact on pregnancy, unbalanced diabetes insulin.
* foetal plan : multiple pregnancy, severe intrauterine growth retardation, severe foetal pathology.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean Olivier Arnaud, Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique - Hôpital Nord

Marseille, Marseille Cedex, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A01759-46

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2018-50

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Muscle Function After Childbirth
NCT05073224 RECRUITING NA