Randomized Study on the Evaluation of the Regular Practice of Standardized Postures Stretching Postural® in Secondary Prevention of Low Back Pains During Pregnancy.
NCT ID: NCT03765853
Last Updated: 2022-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-01
2020-09-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective of our study is to assess the benefit of regular practice of standardised Stretching Postural® postures in patients presenting "de novo" lower back pain during pregnancy.
The Stretching Postural® technique comprises of static postures involving muscular contractions and stretches. This allows the strengthening of the postural muscles, including the paravertebral muscles. After a short learning period, postures can be done autonomously by the patients. The postures are adaptable to each and everyone's morphology and physical limitations.
Our study is an open, prospective, randomised monocentric superiority trial in parallel branches involving major patients during low risk pregnancies. These women suffer from "de novo" lower back pain during the second and third trimesters of their pregnancies. Each patient will be randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups:
* Stretching Postural® group (group A): usual prevention methods (ergonomic education) and Stretching Postural® postures.
* "Control" group (group B): usual prevention methods only.
Patients presenting "de novo" LBP are included in the study after a routine consult then randomly separated into two groups. During the initial consult, the physician assesses inclusion and judgement criteria, collects informed consent from the patients and teaches them the usual prevention methods as well as, concerning group A, Stretching Postural® postures. Computerized support agendas are given in order to improve observance.
Patients are evaluated at day 0 (initial evaluation), after 4 weeks (intermediate) and after 8 weeks (final), according to the main judgment criterion, as well as on secondary pain criteria by the Concise Pain Questionnaire, on their quality of life, the rate of work interruptions and their satisfaction rate. Neonatal outcome is collected at birth. Intermediate phone interviews will allow psychological support and improve observance. Inclusion is scheduled to last 22 months; each subject will be followed during a period of 2 months. The total duration of the study is 2 years.
Expected results are a decrease in back pain and an improvement of the quality of life in group A. Decrease in pain scale, equivalent to overall pain during the last week between the two groups will be our main judgment criterion. In order to detect a difference of 1.5 pain scale points (on a scale from 1 to 10) with an alpha risk of 5%, 80% magnitude and a standard deviation of 2, 56 subjects are necessary; 28 in each group.
Perspectives: This study will allow for a better diagnosis of lower back pain during pregnancy, and, consequently, for the implementation of routine means of care such as collective or private lessons in Stretching Postural® and the supply of personalised prevention documents.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of Proprioceptive Deficits, Psychosocial Factors and Inflammation in Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain
NCT04226716
Posturography Changes During Pregnancy
NCT03067116
Association of Biomechanical Changes and Weight Gain Throughout Pregnancy
NCT01315860
Treatment of Low Back Pain in Pregnant Women : Uses of Drugs and Other Therapies
NCT05072002
Prenatal Yoga for Pregnancy Related Back Pain
NCT03651232
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stretching Postural®
Physiotherapy
Usual prevention methods (ergonomic education) and Stretching Postural® postures.
Control
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physiotherapy
Usual prevention methods (ergonomic education) and Stretching Postural® postures.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Absence of pre existing major lower back pain
* Back or lumbar pain and/or sacroiliac
* Good understanding of French
* BMI before pregnancy \<35
* singletons
* Low risk pregnancy : no maternal and foetal major pathology (absence of professional risk, no antecedent of obstetric pathology, major gynecological pathology, exposure to toxic, important medical risk factors, infectious disease)
* Possibility to listen a computer audio
* Patient having accepted to participate to the study and having signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe cardiac, lung,hepatic, rheumatological pathology
* Sciatic without LPB (Low Back Pain), motor deficit or slipped disc
* High risk pregnancy
* maternal plan : antecedent of late miscarriage, cervix cerclage, disease having an impact on pregnancy, unbalanced diabetes insulin.
* foetal plan : multiple pregnancy, severe intrauterine growth retardation, severe foetal pathology.
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean Olivier Arnaud, Director
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique - Hôpital Nord
Marseille, Marseille Cedex, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-A01759-46
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2018-50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.