Aesthetic Reconstruction of Onco-surgical Mandibular Defects Using FFF With and Without CAD/CAM Customized Cutting Guide

NCT ID: NCT03757273

Last Updated: 2019-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-31

Study Completion Date

2021-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare Aesthetic results and operation time of free fibular flap with and without CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide for reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Oral and maxillofacial tumors posing an important fact as a demanding challenge for surgeons causing face disfigurement which require post-ablation reconstruction. One of the most challenging procedure facing reconstructive surgeons lies in mandibular defects after tumor resection causing facial disharmony affecting aesthetics and function.

Free flaps are considered the gold standard for the reconstruction during oncologic surgery combining a high success rate with low donor site morbidity. Various techniques have been practiced and performed in mandibular defect reconstruction. Hidalgo introduced the fibular graft as an option, offering many Assorted advantages: as it provides a sufficient source for bone and soft tissue harvesting; long reliable vascular pedicle; moreover, only minor donor site morbidity may be involved and flap harvesting require no patient reposition.

Mandibular reconstruction using FFF has become the gold standard. However, flap contouring remain an issue and imprecise with inconvenient or suboptimal final results regrading aesthetic and even more consuming time and efforts owing to poor planning when performed traditionally. Recently, with newly introduced technology and virtual planning, the process has become more uniform and reproducible thus enhancing final outcome improving patient life.

Prefabricated cutting guides may be used may be not, however it still in debate regarding its benefits and worth for patient and surgeon. believing that ability of CAD/CAM technology to achieve Aesthetic and operation time improvement with more detailed evaluation in patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flap with CAD/CAM customized cutting guide.

Our priori-hypothesis is that utilization of CAD/CAM-assisted with customized osteotomy guide is not related to an altered result regarding aesthetic outcome and operation time in patient undergoing mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flap. In order to test this hypothesis, we will compare aesthetic outcome and operation time in group of patients receive FFF by CAD/CAM-assisted with customized osteotomy guide to the results of another group of patients receive FFF but without customized osteotomy guide. only model will be performed as conventional method helping in pre-shaping of reconstruction plate which is another well-established concept of management of mandibular defect.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mandibular Tumors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Because the two interventions used in this trial are easily recognized by the participant and the investigators, neither the investigator nor the participant can be blinded. But, the assessor and the statistician will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FFF with CAD/CAM customized cutting guide

Mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flap with CAD/CAM customized osteotomy guide.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FFF with CAD/CAM customized cutting guide

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This began with the acquisition of a high-resolution CT scan of the craniofacial skeleton and lower legs. the CT scan will be sent to the modeling company for producing autoclavable 3D models and cutting guides of the mandible and fibula to be used during the workflow as well as a model of the final reconstructed mandible. Surgery will be performed by two surgical teams, one for cervicofacial resection and the other harvesting the flap. access to the mandible is obtained, osteotomy guides secured; cuts then accomplished as planned virtually. fibular flap is harvested and cutting guides secured to replicate osteotomies and reshaping as planned to conform with remaining mandible. fixation and pedicle anastomosis is performed. Finally, the operation completed with soft tissue reconstruction.

FFF without customized cutting guide

Mandibular reconstruction using free fibular flap without customized osteotomy guide. CAD/CAM 3D model for mandible will be used.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

FFF without customized cutting guide

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This began with the acquisition of a high-resolution CT scan of the craniofacial skeleton. the C.T scan will be sent to the modeling company for planning three-dimensional model of the mandible. autoclavable model will be prepared for mandible to be used during the workflow for plate reshaping and positioning to conform with the remaining mandible.

Surgery will be performed by two surgical teams, one in charge of cervicofacial resection and the other harvesting the flap. access to the mandible is obtained, and resection/ reconstruction then performed in conventional surgical manner with microvascular anastomosis. Finally, the operation will be completed with soft tissue reconstruction.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FFF with CAD/CAM customized cutting guide

This began with the acquisition of a high-resolution CT scan of the craniofacial skeleton and lower legs. the CT scan will be sent to the modeling company for producing autoclavable 3D models and cutting guides of the mandible and fibula to be used during the workflow as well as a model of the final reconstructed mandible. Surgery will be performed by two surgical teams, one for cervicofacial resection and the other harvesting the flap. access to the mandible is obtained, osteotomy guides secured; cuts then accomplished as planned virtually. fibular flap is harvested and cutting guides secured to replicate osteotomies and reshaping as planned to conform with remaining mandible. fixation and pedicle anastomosis is performed. Finally, the operation completed with soft tissue reconstruction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

FFF without customized cutting guide

This began with the acquisition of a high-resolution CT scan of the craniofacial skeleton. the C.T scan will be sent to the modeling company for planning three-dimensional model of the mandible. autoclavable model will be prepared for mandible to be used during the workflow for plate reshaping and positioning to conform with the remaining mandible.

Surgery will be performed by two surgical teams, one in charge of cervicofacial resection and the other harvesting the flap. access to the mandible is obtained, and resection/ reconstruction then performed in conventional surgical manner with microvascular anastomosis. Finally, the operation will be completed with soft tissue reconstruction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients affected by tumor involving Mandibular bone.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients having poor oncological prognosis
* Patients with poor performance status together with other relative or absolute vascular contraindication.
* Patients require marginal resection or with bilateral fibular fracture
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohammed Esmail Abdullah Al-Sabahi

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammed E Al-Sabahi, Phd. student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry- Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohammed E Al-Sabahi, Phd. student

Role: CONTACT

00201111960834

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohammed E Al-Sabahi, Phd. student

Role: primary

00201111960834

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-Sabahi ME, Jamali OM, Shindy MI, Moussa BG, Amin AA, Zedan MH. Aesthetic Reconstruction of Onco-surgical Mandibular Defects Using Free Fibular Flap with and without CAD/CAM Customized Osteotomy Guide: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10322-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36460978 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

653

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mandibular Reconstruction Bone Plate
NCT06099431 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA