Virtual Surgical Planning Systems in Mandibular Reconstruction
NCT ID: NCT03869723
Last Updated: 2019-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-01
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Surgical Planning in Mandibular Segmental Resection
NCT06174532
Traditional Versus Computerized Mandibular Reconstruction
NCT02913807
A 3D Analysis of Mandibular Plating Strategies in Oromandibular Reconstruction.
NCT03550053
Evaluation of an Universal Surgical Device for Mandibular Reconstruction.
NCT06238076
Aesthetic Reconstruction of Onco-surgical Mandibular Defects Using FFF With and Without CAD/CAM Customized Cutting Guide
NCT03757273
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional surgery
Classical surgery for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap
Conventional surgery
Classical surgery for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap
Virtual planning
Fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction using preoperative virtual planning, cutting guides and osteosynthesis plates. Preoperative modeling was conducted by obtaining scans of patient maxillofacial skeleton and angioscans of the lower extremities. The planning phase was then carried out by the surgeon and the engineer (from MATERIALISE, Leuven, Belgium) so as to define the clinical and technical parameters of the reconstruction. This stage consisted of discussing and determining osteotomy lines, donor side, anastomosis site, and overall reconstruction contour. Resection was decided by the surgeon. 3D modeling and the manufacture of cutting guides and customized osteosynthesis plates were then undertaken
Virtual planning using customized surgical devices
Preoperative modeling was conducted by obtaining scans of patient maxillofacial skeleton and angioscans of the lower extremities. The planning phase was then carried out by the surgeon and the engineer (from MATERIALISE, Leuven, Belgium) so as to define the clinical and technical parameters of the reconstruction. This stage consisted of discussing and determining osteotomy lines, donor side, anastomosis site, and overall reconstruction contour. Resection was decided by the surgeon. 3D modeling and the manufacture of cutting guides and customized osteosynthesis plates were then undertaken
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Virtual planning using customized surgical devices
Preoperative modeling was conducted by obtaining scans of patient maxillofacial skeleton and angioscans of the lower extremities. The planning phase was then carried out by the surgeon and the engineer (from MATERIALISE, Leuven, Belgium) so as to define the clinical and technical parameters of the reconstruction. This stage consisted of discussing and determining osteotomy lines, donor side, anastomosis site, and overall reconstruction contour. Resection was decided by the surgeon. 3D modeling and the manufacture of cutting guides and customized osteosynthesis plates were then undertaken
Conventional surgery
Classical surgery for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient ≥18 years old
* patient alive 6 months after completion of treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with a chirurgical contraindication
* Pregnant or nursing woman
* Adult requiring protection (guardianship, supervision)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Croix-Rousse Hospital - Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blanc J, Fuchsmann C, Nistiriuc-Muntean V, Jacquenot P, Philouze P, Ceruse P. Evaluation of virtual surgical planning systems and customized devices in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Dec;276(12):3477-3486. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05625-z. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRC_GHN_2019_002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.