Comparison Between Prebent & Miniplates in Fixation of Lefort I Osteotomty in Maxillary Advancement.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patients with retruded maxilla ,Will the use of two prebent plates produce more stable results postoperatively in fixation of Le Fort I osteotomy in maxillary advancement than conventional four minplates ? Many studies have been conducted to compare between the two plates and these studies showed that the prebent plate, the plate is not excessively twisted so that it can be adapted passively leading to less changes in the property of the material ,increased titanium contact surface to the bone leading to better force distribution resulting in better rigid fixation as no stresses will be transmitted from the plate to the bone leading to faster bone healing and consequently better long term postoperative stability.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison Between Prebent Plates and Custom Plates After le Fort 1 in Orthognathic Surgery

NCT06188403

Orthognathic Surgery

COMPLETED NA

Custom Titanium Plates vs. 3D Splints in LeFort I Osteotomy

NCT06933628

Dentofacial Deformities

COMPLETED NA

Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries

NCT07311785

Orthognathic Surgery

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Three Dimensional Versus Standard Miniplate In Fixation Of Mandibular Angle Fracture- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

NCT01939015

Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Double Y-shaped Plates and Lag Screws in Fixation of Anterior Mandibular Fractures

NCT04396054

Mandibular Fractures

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The stability of maxillary advancement after Le Fort I osteotomy in retruded maxilla patients has been an issue that has attracted the attention of numerous researchers. That's why different fixation methods have been compared in vitro and in vivo.

Prebent plates is one of the recent modifications of the plate systems used in maxillofacial surgery , they were created to reduce the need for bending and contouring of the titanium miniplates.

Lye et al.,(the only in vivo study in English), aimed to evaluate the predictability of advancement surgery with the use of prebent plates in 36 patients \& he proved the prebent plates have been proven to significantly affect the advancement \& reliable.

In a biomechanical study, prebent plates provided better results than the standard two plate scenario in terms of resistance to displacement, permanent deformation and load for breaking.

Fatih Mehmet Coskunses et al., in 2015 has done in vitro study to evaluate the segmental displacement, and von mises stress on the titanium miniplates \& the maximum principal stress on the bone, with the use of prebent plates and two standard L plates adapted to either the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or the nasal piriform following anterior advancement of 5 mm or 10 mm by Le Fort I osteotomy.

The results of the study were, In 5 mm maxillary advancement using prebent plates for the fixation of bone segments resulted in less segmental displacement than the standard two plate.

Even when adapted posteriorly or anteriorly, the prebent plates were able to be more stable than two plates technique. Moreover, Not only the one prebent scenario had the lowest segmental displacements, but also the lowest maximum principal stresses on bone in the anteriorly adapted group.

These results are due to the structure of the prebent plates that have two arms extending in opposite directions (anteriorly and posteriorly) and it is suggested that the prebent plates are preferable alternatives to the traditional two plate configurations in osteotomies with up to 5 mm advancement. The prebent plates showed similar satisfactory results with 10 mm advancement only when adapted anteriorly. In contrast, when adapted posteriorly, the prebent plates resulted in obvious failure in the 10 mm advancement model.

Based on these data , My research will compare the postoperative stability between 2 groups of retruded maxilla patients having maxillary advancement up to 5 mm

1. the 1st group will be fixed using 2 prebent plates placed at nasal piriform
2. the 2nd group will be fixed using 4 miniplates placed at nasal piriform \& zygmoaticomaxillay buttress.

The aim of this study:

To find out if the two prebent plates provides a stable postoperative maxillary advancement movement than the traditional four miniplates.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retruded Hypoplastic Maxilla

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Cards will have sequential numbers one number for each card then these cards will be placed within opaque sealed envelopes. Then these envelops will be placed in a container (box), each participant will grasp one envelope the day of procedure.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

prebent plate

fixation of le fort I osteotomy using prebent plate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lefort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fixation of lefort I osteotomy in patients with retruded maxilla with two prebent plates versus four miniplates.

Conventional four miniplates

fixation of le fort I osteotomy using conventional four miniplates

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

lefort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fixation of lefort I osteotomy in patients with retruded maxilla with two prebent plates versus four miniplates.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lefort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement

fixation of lefort I osteotomy in patients with retruded maxilla with two prebent plates versus four miniplates.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

four miniplates

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with retruded maxilla \& need advancement by le fort I osteotomy.
* Patients free from any systemic disease \& bone metabolism diseases.
* Patients with no signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders.
* No sex predilection
* Age range ( 18-45)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic disease \& bone metabolism diseases.
* Patients with cleft lip \& palate.
* Patients with temporomandibular joint disorders
* Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy "due to the risk of low bone quality and healing
* Age less than 18

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hagar Mahmoud Ahmed Mohamed

Resident of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Nasser Institute Hospital for research & treatment / Master Candidate of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Cairo University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR