Evaluation of Customized V Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates of Mandibular Angle Fracture

NCT ID: NCT03761524

Last Updated: 2019-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-31

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study to evaluate the effect of customized V pattern plate fixation versus a conventional superior-inferior mini plates fixation of mandibular angle fracture on mouth opening and radio graphical parameters.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The mandibular angle is one of the most common sites for fractures, accounting for 23-42% of all cases of mandibular fractures. Moreover, mandibular angle fractures have the highest postoperative complications among all mandibular fractures, and the loosening of screws and fracturing of plates are main reasons for the complications.The most widely used treatment modality for mandibular angle fracture is the use of one miniplate fixation ,The other one uses two mini-plates, with a upper mini-plate fixed at the same place of previous treatment which corresponds to the tension band of the mandible, and the lower mini-plate fixed at the inferior border of the mandible which corresponds to the compression band of the mandible, however, based on recent experimental and clinical studies, the stability provided by the miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures has become a point of contention among surgeons .In order to decrease the need for plate removal, reduce the operative time and improve the stability of the fixation system, a customized V pattern plate design is an appropriate plate structure for fractured mandible using the minimum output values for stress of plate and displacement of bony segments to seek maximum reduction volume on an original plate .Patient satisfaction include: clinical parameters such are occlusion, pain, facial swelling, maximal mouth opening, sensory function, and surgical wound ,these should be evaluated postoperatively ,radio graphical evaluation is also an important parameter to assess adequate reduction of the fractured segments .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mandibular Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Because the two interventions used in this trial are easily recognized by the participants and the investigator, neither the investigator nor the participant can be blinded. But, assessor and the statistician will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Customized V plate fixation

Computed tomography (CT) scan of the Facial bones (Axial cuts, DICOM file, Gantry tilt zero and minimal thickness of 1mm )is taken for the patients and a customized V pattern plate

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Customized V plate fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

(CT) scan is taken for the patients and a customized V pattern plate will be designed .Intraoral approach will be done to expose the angle fracture.Fracture site will be exposed and reduced in normal anatomic position guided by the CAD/CAM plate. MMF will be done.Fracture fragments will be fixed using CAD/CAM plate .

Conventional miniplates fixation

Conventional superior-inferior miniplates fixation of mandibular angle fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional miniplates fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intraoral approach will be done to expose the angle fracture.Fracture site will be exposed and reduced in normal anatomic position. MMF will be done.Fracture fragments will be fixed using conventional miniplates fixation of angle fracture.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Customized V plate fixation

(CT) scan is taken for the patients and a customized V pattern plate will be designed .Intraoral approach will be done to expose the angle fracture.Fracture site will be exposed and reduced in normal anatomic position guided by the CAD/CAM plate. MMF will be done.Fracture fragments will be fixed using CAD/CAM plate .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional miniplates fixation

Intraoral approach will be done to expose the angle fracture.Fracture site will be exposed and reduced in normal anatomic position. MMF will be done.Fracture fragments will be fixed using conventional miniplates fixation of angle fracture.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with at least a unilateral unfavorable angle fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fracture elsewhere in the mandible or midrace.
* Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic disease (may affect normal healing).
* Patients with old and/or malunited fractures (affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments).
* Patients whom cannot tolerate follow up intervals (affect accuracy of study results).
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hiba Obad Saleh Saeed

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hiba O Saleh, Phd.student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry-Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hiba O Saleh, Phd.student

Role: CONTACT

00201010389391

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saleh HO, Moussa BG, Salah Eddin KA, Noman SA, Salah AM. Assessment of CAD/CAM Customized V Pattern Plate Versus Standard Miniplates Fixation in Mandibular Angle Fracture (Randomized Clinical Trial). J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Dec;22(4):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-02027-x. Epub 2023 Oct 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38105847 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

543

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mandibular First Molar Distalization
NCT04229797 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA