Effectiveness of Visual and Auditory Feedback on Eye-hand Coordination in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

NCT ID: NCT03742999

Last Updated: 2018-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2019-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to investigate potential benefits of adding augmented biofeedback training to standard therapy in improving eye-hand coordination in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy .Participants were divided randomly into three equal groups. Group (A) received specially designed program of physical therapy intervention strategies to facilitate visual motor integration and visual perception over a period of three months. Group (B) received augmented biofeedback training only, and group (C) received augmented biofeedback training and same physical therapy program as group (A).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children were assigned randomly into three groups of equal number (A, B and C). Children were selected randomly by collecting all names of children that matched the inclusion criteria of the study then upload the names and gender using an electronic program (SPSS) which divided the sample into three equal groups (A), (B) \& (C). Group A: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received specially designed program of physical therapy exercises to facilitate eye-hand coordination to improve visual-motor coordination and grasping skills, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. The tools used in training program were: button strip, lacing strip and its lace, mottle with screw- on cap, markers with different colors, beads and its lacing, square cubes, pellets, papers, blunt scissors, colored cubes, different types of form board and its shapes. Adjusted chair and table were used to accommodate differences in children's body built. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.

Group B: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received training using the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months. Group C: this group included fifteen children with spastic hemiplegic CP. Children of this group received the same physical therapy program as conducted for group A, and training with E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser as conducted for group B. The training was for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.

The participated children were assessed by the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (2nd edition) (PDMS-2) Test before and after the three months of the treatment program. The average time required for evaluating each child was 40 min. The assessment and training methods were applied according to the instructions provided in the test and equipment manuals, no modifications were necessary.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group A

Group (A) physical therapy program for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

physical therapy program

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

this group received specially designed physical therapy program to facilitate eye-hand coordination and fine motor to improve VMI, VP and MC, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.

group B

Group (B) E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser (augmented biofeedback training)for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser

Intervention Type DEVICE

The exercises in the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser System are in the form of simple and exciting games such as soccer, hitting walls, space shooting, driving, arnd throwing balls into a bucket.Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months

group C

group (C) physical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

physical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

physical therapy program

this group received specially designed physical therapy program to facilitate eye-hand coordination and fine motor to improve VMI, VP and MC, which included: unbutton buttons, and button in all again; put the pellets in the bottle as fast as he/she can; place the shapes on its form board; build steps, wall, pyramid and a tower from cubes; cut out a line, square, triangle, and rectangular shapes on a paper by scissor; string squared cubes and lace the holes of strip. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser

The exercises in the E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser System are in the form of simple and exciting games such as soccer, hitting walls, space shooting, driving, arnd throwing balls into a bucket.Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three consecutive months

Intervention Type DEVICE

physical therapy program and ELink Upper Limb Exerciser

physical therapy program and E-Link Upper Limb Exerciser. Children were trained for 60 minutes per session, three times a week for three months

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Grade of spasticity between 1 to 1+ according to Modified ashworth Scale,
* The ability to handle objects independently was between level (I) and (II)
* According to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
* No history of epilepsy
* No botulinum toxin A treatment for the upper extremities in the previous 6 months
* Able to understand and follow verbal commands and instructions

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of visual or auditory impairments
* Significant tightness or fixed deformities in the upper limbs
* Severe spasticity
* Autism
* Severe cognitive impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Reem M Alwhaibi

associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Reem M Alwhaibi, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Disabled Children's Association

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Reem M Alwhaibi, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+966599112273 ext. +966599112273

Reem M Alwhaibi

Role: CONTACT

+966599112273 ext. +966599112273

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Reem M Alwhaibi

Role: primary

+966599112273 ext. +966599112273

Reham M Alsakhawi, phd

Role: backup

+966504182628

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

205-w-37

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AOT and ICT for Hemiplegia
NCT03094455 COMPLETED NA