Study Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of PLENVU® Versus SELG-ESSE® Using a 2-Day Split Dosing Regimen.
NCT ID: NCT03742232
Last Updated: 2020-08-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
399 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-31
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Investigate Bowel Cleansing With PLENVU® Compared to Sodium Picosulfate in Participants Aged 1 to < 18 Years of Age in Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT07218523
1L- vs. 4L-PEG for Bowel Preparation Among Inpatients.
NCT04310332
Evaluation of Two Different Regimens of Colon Preparations for Advanced Cleaning.
NCT05570669
A Trial to Compare Efficacy and Tolerability of Plenvu® and Picoprep® as Cleansing Agents Before Colonoscopy
NCT05436054
Study to Assess the Tolerability, Safety and Efficacy of an Adapted Gut Cleansing Solution in Routine Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies
NCT01251237
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PLENVU
PLENVU® supplied as two powder-for-oral-solution formulations. One formulation contains PEG3350, sodium sulphate and electrolytes, and the second formulation contains PEG3350, sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and electrolytes.
PEG3350
PLENVU® supplied as two powder-for-oral-solution formulations. One formulation contains PEG3350, sodium sulphate and electrolytes, and the second formulation contains PEG3350, sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and electrolytes.
PLENVU® Administration: 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen (to commence in the evening of the day before colonoscopy).
SELG-ESSE
SELG-ESSE® supplied as powder-for-oral-solution containing PEG4000, simethicone, sodium sulphate and sodium bicarbonate, and electrolytes.
Macrogol 4000
SELG-ESSE® supplied as powder-for-oral-solution containing PEG4000, simethicone, sodium sulphate and sodium bicarbonate, and electrolytes.
SELG-ESSE® Administration: 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen (to commence in the evening of the day before colonoscopy).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PEG3350
PLENVU® supplied as two powder-for-oral-solution formulations. One formulation contains PEG3350, sodium sulphate and electrolytes, and the second formulation contains PEG3350, sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and electrolytes.
PLENVU® Administration: 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen (to commence in the evening of the day before colonoscopy).
Macrogol 4000
SELG-ESSE® supplied as powder-for-oral-solution containing PEG4000, simethicone, sodium sulphate and sodium bicarbonate, and electrolytes.
SELG-ESSE® Administration: 2-Day Split-Dosing Regimen (to commence in the evening of the day before colonoscopy).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male and female outpatients and inpatients aged: ≥18 to ≤85 years undergoing a screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy.
3. Females of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and at Visit 2 and must be practising one of the following methods of birth control and agree to continue with the regimen throughout the study period:
* Oral, implantable, or injectable contraceptives (for a minimum of three months before study entry) in combination with a condom;
* Intrauterine device in combination with a condom; Double barrier method (condom\*, and occlusive cap \[diaphragm or cervical/vault caps\] with spermicidal foam/gel/film/ cream/suppository); \*A female condom and a male condom should not be used together as friction between the two can result in either product failing.
If any female patient has a positive pregnancy test at Visit 2, they will be excluded from further participation in the study for the efficacy evaluation, i.e. they will not undergo the colonoscopy procedure. The Investigator will be required to arrange a colonoscopy procedure outside of the study.
Note: The above birth control methods do not apply to females who are postmenopausal or surgically sterile i.e. 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea or 6 weeks' post-surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy or hysterectomy, or whose sole sexual partner has had a vasectomy and has received medical assessment of the surgical success.
4. Willing, able and competent to complete the entire study and to comply with instructions.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with ongoing severe acute Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
3. Patients who have had previous significant gastrointestinal surgeries, including colonic resection, sub-total colectomy, abdomino-perineal resection, de-functioning colostomy, Hartmann's procedure and defunctioning ileostomy or other similar surgeries involving structure and function of the small or large colon.
4. Regular use of laxatives or colon motility altering drugs (i.e. more than 2-3 times per week) in the last 28 days prior to the Screening Visit and/or laxative use within 72 hours prior to administration of the preparation.
5. Patients with active intestinal bleeding episodes
6. Known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency.
7. Known phenylketonuria.
8. Known hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols, ascorbic acid and sulfates (not including sulfa-based products) or any other component of the investigational product or comparator.
9. Past history within the last 12 months or evidence of any on-going clinically relevant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities (e.g. arrhythmias).
10. History of uncontrolled hypertension with systolic blood pressure \>170 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure \>100 mmHg.
11. Patients with cardiac insufficiency NYHA grades III or IV.
12. Patients with severe renal insufficiency.
13. Patients with known liver disease of grades B and C according to the Child Pugh classification.
14. Patients suffering from dehydration at screening as evaluated by the Investigator from physical examination.
15. Patients with pre-existing clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities, or dehydration.
16. Patients with impaired consciousness that might predispose them to pulmonary aspiration.
17. Patients undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and/or decompression.
18. Patients who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study.
19. Clinically relevant findings on physical examination based on the Investigator's judgment.
20. History of drug or alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to dosing.
21. Concurrent participation in an investigational drug or device study or participation within three months of study entry.
22. Patients who, in the opinion of the Investigator, should not be included in the study for any reason, including inability to follow study procedures, e.g. cognitively impaired, debilitated or fragile patients.
23. Patients who are ordered to live in an institution on court or authority order.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico
Aviano, Italia, Italy
Fondazione Poliambulanza
Brescia, Italia, Italy
Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital
Roma, Italia, Italy
ISMETT
Palermo, , Italy
Humanitas Research Hospital
Rozzano, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Repici A, Spada C, Cannizzaro R, Traina M, Maselli R, Maiero S, Galtieri A, Guarnieri G, Di Leo M, Lorenzetti R, Capogreco A, Spadaccini M, Antonelli G, Zullo A, Amata M, Ferrara E, Correale L, Granata A, Cesaro P, Radaelli F, Minelli Grazioli L, Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Finati E, Pellegatta G, Carrara S, Occhipinti P, Buda A, Fuccio L, Manno M, Hassan C. Novel 1-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate versus high-volume polyethylene glycol regimen for colonoscopy cleansing: a multicenter, randomized, phase IV study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):823-831.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2063
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.