A Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of Moviprep® Versus a 4L PEG+E Standard Solution

NCT ID: NCT00389233

Last Updated: 2008-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-06-30

Study Completion Date

2002-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study was carried out as a randomised, single-blind, active-controlled, multi-centric, phase III study with two parallel treatment groups. The primary efficacy criterion was the frequency of effective gut cleansing in each of the two treatment groups (grade A or B "overall quality of gut cleansing" as judged by a blinded expert panel on the basis of videotapes recorded during the endoscopic procedure).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was designed as a randomised, active-controlled, single-blind, multi-centre, pivotal phase III trial with two parallel treatment groups. 15 German hospitals with specialised gastroenterology units were expected to participate in the investigation.

Up to 360 hospital in-patients routinely scheduled to undergo complete colonoscopy were to be enrolled one to two days prior to the endoscopic procedure, and to be randomly allocated to one of the two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. Bowel preparation was performed using equal split doses of either low-volume NRL994 (two doses of 1,000 mL each) or high-volume PEG+E (two doses of 2,000 mL each). The first dose was to be taken in the evening before the procedure, the second dose on the morning of the day of the colonoscopy. The patients allocated to NRL994 were asked to drink at least 1L of additional clear liquid in addition to the study drug. During colonoscopy the cleansing of each of the five pre-defined gut segments was to be assessed by the physician performing the examination, using a 5-level verbal rating scale. Videotapes were to be recorded of all procedures in order to allow central review by a blinded and independent expert panel whose ratings were the primary basis for the analysis of efficacy. The patients enrolled in the study were asked to fill in a questionnaire concerning the acceptability of the preparation. A patient's participation in the study was terminated upon completion of the intervention by performing a final examination and filling in the study termination page. No interim analysis was to be performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

2L gut cleansing solution

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate

Intervention Type DRUG

1 pack will consist of 2L NRL 994 - 4 (2 x PEG + E/"P" + 2 x Vitamin C/"C") sachets for the 2L of 2 sachets (1 x "P" plus 1 x "C") will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour followed by at least 500ml of any additional clear fluid.

2

4L preparation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl

Intervention Type DRUG

1 pack will consist of 4L PEG + E - contains 4 sachets for the 4L of PEG + E/"P/E". Each sachet will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Macrogol3350 NA sulphate NACl KCl ascorbic acid NA ascorbate

1 pack will consist of 2L NRL 994 - 4 (2 x PEG + E/"P" + 2 x Vitamin C/"C") sachets for the 2L of 2 sachets (1 x "P" plus 1 x "C") will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour followed by at least 500ml of any additional clear fluid.

Intervention Type DRUG

Macrogol3350 Na sulphate Na bicarbonate NaCl KCl

1 pack will consist of 4L PEG + E - contains 4 sachets for the 4L of PEG + E/"P/E". Each sachet will be dissolved in 1L of water. Each litre will be drunk within 1 hour.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MOVIPREP® KLEAN-PREP®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* written informed consent prior to inclusion;
* male or female in-patients, aged 18 to 85 years, with indication for complete colonoscopy;
* willing and able to complete the entire procedure and to comply with study instructions;
* females of childbearing potential employing an adequate method of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria

* ileus;
* intestinal obstruction or perforation;
* toxic megacolon;
* congestive heart failure (NYHA class III and IV);
* acute life-threatening cardiovascular disease;
* untreated or uncontrolled arterial hypertension (SBP max\>170mmHg, DBP min\>100mmHg);
* severe renal failure;
* severe liver failure;
* known glucose-6-phosphatase dehydrogenase deficiency;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Norgine

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Norgine

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Ell, Prof Dr med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Internal Medicine II, Dr.-Horst-Schmidt Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the University Mainz

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chefarzt der Abt. Gastroenterologie, Klinikum St. Marien

Amberg, , Germany

Site Status

Chefarzt Innere Medizin, Klinikum Aschaffenburg

Aschaffenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Dachau, Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie

Dachau, , Germany

Site Status

Chefarzt, Katholisches Krankenhaus St. Johann Nepomuk

Erfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien,

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Zentrum für Innere Medizin,

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Bürgerhospital Frankfurt e.V., Abteilung für interventionelle Endoskopie

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Städtische Kliniken Frankfurt-Höchst

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Fürth, Med. Klinik II

Fürth, , Germany

Site Status

Abteilung für Innere Medizin, Israelitisches Krankenhaus

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Kreiskrankenhaus

Tirschenreuth, , Germany

Site Status

Dr.-Horst-Schmidt-Kliniken GmbH, Innere Medizin II

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch JH, et al. Ergebnisse einer randomisierten, multizentrischen verblindeten Vergleichsstudie zur Wirksamkeit, Akzeptanz und Sicherheit einer neuen 2 Liter Darmvorbereitungslosung (Moviprep) im Vergleich zu einer etablierten 4 Liter Golytely Losung.[Results of a randomised, multi-centre, single-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, acceptability and safety of a new 2-litre gut cleansing solution versus a standard 4-litre PEG+E solution.] Z Gastroenterol 2004;42:P169

Reference Type RESULT

Ell C, Gruss HJ.Results of a Randomised, Multi-Centre, Single-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Acceptability and Safety of a New 2-Litre Gut Cleansing Solution Versus a Standard 4-Litre PEG+E Solution.Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59(5):AB125

Reference Type RESULT

Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, Dertinger S, Layer P, Runzi M, Schneider T, Kachel G, Gruger J, Kollinger M, Nagell W, Goerg KJ, Wanitschke R, Gruss HJ. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;103(4):883-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01708.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18190651 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NRL994-01/2001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id