Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
NCT ID: NCT00427089
Last Updated: 2008-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
360 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2005-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
2L gut cleansing solution
Macrogol 3350 Na sulphate NaCl KCl Ascorbic Acid Na Ascorbate
2L gut lavage solution
2
Sodium Phosphate solution (NaP)
45 ml solution; BID
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Macrogol 3350 Na sulphate NaCl KCl Ascorbic Acid Na Ascorbate
2L gut lavage solution
Sodium Phosphate solution (NaP)
45 ml solution; BID
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male or female ambulatory subjects with an age of 18 to 85 years planned to undergo a complete colonoscopy for colon cancer screening
3. Willing, able and competent to complete the entire procedure and to comply with study instructions
4. Females of childbearing potential had to employ an adequate method of contraception
Exclusion Criteria
2. Intestinal obstruction or perforation
3. Toxic megacolon
4. History of colonic resection
5. Requirement for permanent medication and associated stable serum concentrations (e.g. neuroleptic drugs)
6. Congestive heart failure (NYHA III + IV)
7. Acute life threatening cardiovascular disease
8. Untreated or uncontrolled arterial hypertension (max. \> 170 mmHg and min \> 100 mmHg)
9. Known moderate to severe renal insufficiency
10. Severe renal failure
11. Severe liver failure
12. Known glucose 6 phosphatase dehydrogenase deficiency
13. Known phenylketonuria
14. Known hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols, NaP and/or Vitamin C
15. Concurrent participation in an investigational drug study or participation within 30 days of study entry
16. Females who were pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy. Females of child bearing potential not using reliable methods of contraception
17. Subject had a condition or was in a situation, which in the investigators opinion might have put the subject at significant risk, might confound the study results, or might interfere significantly.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norgine
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Norgine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christian Ell, Prof Dr med
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken GmbH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinikum Aschaffenburg Am Hasenkopf 1
Aschaffenburg, Bavaria, Germany
Schiessgrabenstr. 34
Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
Spardorfer Str. 39
Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
Heiligengrabstr. 22
Hof, Bavaria, Germany
Rätestr. 20
Kirchheim, Bavaria, Germany
Sternbergstr. 8
Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany
Israelitische Krankenhaus Abt. innere Medizin Orchideenstieg 14
Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany
Dieburger Str. 29
Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany
Unter den Eichen 26
Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
Erzbergstr. 113
Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Kath. Krankenhaus St. Johann Nepomuk Abt. für Endoskopie Haarbergstr. 72
Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany
Uferstr. 3
Minden, Westfalen-Lippe, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ell C, Fischbach W, Layer P, Boehm G, Bokemeyer B, Frick B, et al. Polyethylene Glycol with electrolytes and ascorbic acid versus sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing before coloscopy for cancer screening: a randomised, controlled trial. Endoscopy 2006; 38 (Suppl II): A18
Ell C, Fischbach W, Layer P, Halphen M. Randomized, controlled trial of 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate components versus sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy for cancer screening. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2493-503. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.960513. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NRL 994-01/2004 (HSG)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id