A Study Comparing ATB200/AT2221 With Alglucosidase Alfa/Placebo in Adult Subjects With Late-onset Pompe Disease
NCT ID: NCT03729362
Last Updated: 2025-09-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-04
2021-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Expanded Access for ATB200/AT2221 for the Treatment of Pompe Disease
NCT03865836
Safety and Efficacy Study of Alfimeprase in Subjects With Occluded Catheters
NCT00322270
Ultrasound-guided Femoral Vein Accessibility, Safety and Time for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment
NCT02834221
Trigger- vs. Substrate-Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
NCT00196183
Dapagliflozin to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Transcatheter Pulmonary Venous Isolation.
NCT04780438
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will consist of a screening period up to 30 days, a 12-month treatment period, and a 30 day safety follow-up period. Subjects who complete this study will have the option to participate in an open label extension study to receive ATB200/AT2221 under a separate protocol.
Enzyme replacement therapy-experienced subjects will continue to take alglucosidase alfa during the screening period; treatment with alglucosidase alfa will then be replaced by study drug (ATB200/AT2221 or alglucosidase alfa/placebo) on the same schedule without interruption (ie, every 2 weeks).
Infusion visits will be scheduled every 2 weeks throughout the study; assessments (eg, clinical laboratory tests) for initial safety monitoring will be performed at these visits for the first 6 weeks of the study. Study visits that include efficacy, safety, and other assessments will be scheduled approximately every 3 months and may occur over 2 days, provided all study assessments and procedures (with the exception of pharmacokinetic \[PK\] sample collection) are performed before administration of study drug.
Efficacy assessments (ie, functional assessments) include evaluation of ambulatory function (6MWT), motor function tests (Gait, Stair, Gowers' maneuver, and Chair \[GSGC\] test and Timed Up and Go \[TUG\] test), muscle strength (manual muscle testing and quantitative muscle testing), and pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity \[FVC\], slow vital capacity \[SVC\], maximal inspiratory pressure \[MIP\], maximal expiratory pressure \[MEP\], and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure \[SNIP\]). Patient reported outcomes (Rasch-built Pompe-specific Activity \[R PAct\] Scale, EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Instrument \[EQ-5D-5L\], Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System \[PROMIS®\] instruments for physical function, fatigue, dyspnea, and upper extremity, and Subject's Global Impression of Change). The Physician's Global Impression of Change will also be performed.
Pharmacodynamic assessments include measurement of biomarkers of muscle injury (creatine kinase \[CK\]) and disease substrate (urinary hexose tetrasaccharide \[Hex4\]). Blood samples will be collected for determination of total GAA protein levels and AT2221 concentrations in plasma for a population PK analysis. Safety assessments include monitoring of adverse events (AEs), including infusion associated reactions (IARs), clinical laboratory tests (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), vital signs, physical examinations including weight, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and immunogenicity. Concomitant medications and nondrug therapies will also be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cipaglucosidase Alfa/Miglustat
Participants received cipaglucosidase alfa co-administered with miglustat every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Cipaglucosidase Alfa
Participants received an intravenous (IV) infusion dose over a 4-hour duration every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Miglustat
Participants received weight-based doses 1 hour prior to cipaglucosidase alfa infusion Q2W.
Alglucosidase Alfa/Placebo
Participants received alglucosidase alfa co-administered with placebo Q2W.
Alglucosidase Alfa
Participants received an IV infusion dose over a 4-hour duration Q2W.
Placebo
Miglustat matching placebo was administered orally 1 hour prior to alglucosidase alfa infusion Q2W.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cipaglucosidase Alfa
Participants received an intravenous (IV) infusion dose over a 4-hour duration every 2 weeks (Q2W).
Miglustat
Participants received weight-based doses 1 hour prior to cipaglucosidase alfa infusion Q2W.
Alglucosidase Alfa
Participants received an IV infusion dose over a 4-hour duration Q2W.
Placebo
Miglustat matching placebo was administered orally 1 hour prior to alglucosidase alfa infusion Q2W.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male and female subjects are ≥ 18 years old and weigh ≥ 40 kg at screening.
3. Female subjects of childbearing potential and male subjects must agree to use medically accepted methods of contraception during the study and for 90 days after the last dose of study drug.
4. Subject must have a diagnosis of LOPD based on documentation of one of the following:
1. deficiency of GAA enzyme
2. GAA genotyping
5. Subject is classified as one of the following with respect to ERT status:
1. ERT-experienced, defined as currently receiving standard of care ERT (alglucosidase alfa) at the recommended dose and regimen (ie, 20 mg/kg dose every 2 weeks) for ≥ 24 months
2. ERT-naïve, defined as never having received investigational or commercially available ERT
6. Subject has a sitting FVC ≥ 30% of the predicted value for healthy adults (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III) at screening.
7. Subject performs two 6MWTs at screening that are valid, as determined by the clinical evaluator, and that meet all of the following criteria:
1. both screening values of 6MWD are ≥ 75 meters
2. both screening values of 6MWD are ≤ 90% of the predicted value for healthy adults
3. the lower value of 6MWD is within 20% of the higher value of 6MWD
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has received gene therapy for Pompe disease
3. Subject is taking any of the following prohibited medications within 30 days before Day 1:
* miglitol (eg, Glyset)
* miglustat (eg, Zavesca)
* acarbose (eg, Precose or Glucobay)
* voglibose (eg, Volix, Vocarb, or Volibo)
Note: None of these medications have a half-life that, when multiplied by 5, is longer than 30 days.
4. Subject requires the use of invasive or noninvasive ventilation support for \> 6 hours per day while awake.
5. Subject has a hypersensitivity to any of the excipients in ATB200, alglucosidase alfa, or AT2221.
6. Subject has a medical condition or any other extenuating circumstance that may, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor, pose an undue safety risk to the subject or may compromise his/her ability to comply with or adversely impact protocol requirements. This includes clinical depression (as diagnosed by a psychiatrist or other mental health professional) with uncontrolled or poorly controlled symptoms.
7. Subject, if female, is pregnant or breastfeeding at screening.
8. Subject, whether male or female, is planning to conceive a child during the study.
9. Subject does not have documentation of diagnosis of Pompe disease and refuses to undergo genetic testing.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amicus Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neuromuscular Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, United States
UF Helath: University of Florida Clinical Research Center
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of South Florida Research Center
Tampa, Florida, United States
Emory Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
University of Minnesota Clinical Research Unit
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Billings Clinic
Billings, Montana, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Manhasset, New York, United States
NYU School of Medicine
New York, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Cincinnati Neurology
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Utah, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Lysosomal and Rare Disorders Research
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Hospital Universitario Austral
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Monash Medical Centre
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, , Australia
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
Innsbruck, , Austria
UZ Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska
Banja Luka, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
UMHAT Alexandrovska
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Heritage Medical Research Clinic, University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
McMaster University Medical Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Aarhus Universitets Hospital
Aarhus N, , Denmark
Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Neuromuscular Center
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer
Bron, , France
Hôpital Raymond Poincaré
Garches, , France
Hôpital Salengro
Lille, , France
Hôpital de la Timone
Marseille, , France
Hôpital Pasteur
Nice, , France
Friedrich-Baur Institut
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Eginition Hospital
Athens, Attica, Greece
Semmelweis University, Institute of Genomic Medicine and Rare Disease
Budapest, , Hungary
University of Pécs
Pécs, , Hungary
University of Szeged
Szeged, , Hungary
UOC di Neurologia e Malattie Neuromuscolari
Messina, NAP, Italy
UOC Genetica Medica
Napoli, NAP, Italy
Hokkaido University Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
Fukuoka University Hospital
Fukuoka, , Japan
Kagoshima University Hospital
Kagoshima, , Japan
Izumi City General Hospital
Osaka, , Japan
The Jikei University Hospital
Tokyo, , Japan
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
Tokyo, , Japan
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
University of Auckland
Auckland, , New Zealand
Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
Małogoskie, , Poland
Centrum Medyczne
Rzeszów, , Poland
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, , Slovenia
Pusan National University
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, , South Korea
Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, , Sweden
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Royal Free Hospital NHS
London, , United Kingdom
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Salford, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kushlaf H, Diaz-Manera J, Bratkovic D, Byrne BJ, Claeys KG, Clemens PR, Dimachkie MM, Kishnani PS, Laforet P, Roberts M, Schoser B, Toscano A, Castelli J, Holdbrook F, Sitaraman Das S, Goldman M, Mozaffar T; PROPEL Study Group. Switching Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Late-Onset Pompe Disease From Alglucosidase Alfa to Cipaglucosidase Alfa Plus Miglustat: Post Hoc Effect Size Analysis of PROPEL. Muscle Nerve. 2025 Aug;72(2):230-239. doi: 10.1002/mus.28420. Epub 2025 May 7.
Kishnani PS, Byrne BJ, Claeys KG, Diaz-Manera J, Dimachkie MM, Kushlaf H, Mozaffar T, Roberts M, Schoser B, Hummel N, Kopiec A, Holdbrook F, Shohet S, Toscano A; PROPEL Study Group. Switching treatment to cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat positively affects patient-reported outcome measures in patients with late-onset Pompe disease. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 13;8(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00805-w.
MacCulloch A, Griffiths A, Johnson N, Shohet S. Health-Related Quality-of-Life Utility Values in Adults With Late-Onset Pompe Disease: Analyses of EQ-5D Data From the PROPEL Clinical Trial. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024 Sep 18;11(2):80-85. doi: 10.36469/001c.121928. eCollection 2024.
Kishnani PS, Shohet S, Raza S, Hummel N, Castelli JP, Sitaraman Das S, Jiang H, Kopiec A, Keyzor I, Hahn A. Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(R)) physical function questionnaire in late-onset Pompe disease using PROPEL phase 3 data. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jan 31;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00686-z.
Schoser B, Roberts M, Byrne BJ, Sitaraman S, Jiang H, Laforet P, Toscano A, Castelli J, Diaz-Manera J, Goldman M, van der Ploeg AT, Bratkovic D, Kuchipudi S, Mozaffar T, Kishnani PS; PROPEL Study Group. Safety and efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat versus alglucosidase alfa plus placebo in late-onset Pompe disease (PROPEL): an international, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):1027-1037. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00331-8.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ATB200-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.