Success Rate of Single Versus Two Visit Regenerative Treatment Protocol in Non Vital Mature Anterior Teeth
NCT ID: NCT03717337
Last Updated: 2018-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2020-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients are randomized into two groups where treatment will be done either in one visit including access, disinfection, placing platelet rich plasma as scaffold and restoration or two visit protocol involving access, disinfection and placing calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament in first visit followed by a second visit after 3 weeks involving reopening of the tooth, removing intracanal medicament and placing platelet rich plasma as scaffold then restoration. Success rate is defined as absence of subjective signs and symptoms along with healing of periapical lesion
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment With PRF as a Secondary Treatment of Mature Necrotic Incisors in Adolescents
NCT05517187
Evaluation of the Survival of Inflamed Mature Single Rooted Teeth
NCT03725514
Evaluation of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Revascularization of Non Vital Immature Anterior Teeth
NCT03589560
Digitized Assessment for the Survival of Mature Anterior Teeth With Periapical Lesion After One Step Regenerative Approach Using Different Asepsis Maneuvers
NCT03652129
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Regeneration Using Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06086249
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The majority of endodontic patients are adults, thus the application of the tissue engineering concept to mature teeth could provide a biological treatment modality instead of the conventional one. In fact, several advantages were reported about regenerative procedures in well developed mature teeth. Reconstitution of the neurovascular system in root canals by pulp regeneration will provide pulp tissues with an immune system, which will function as the first line of defense against microbial challenge. Moreover, restoration of pulp dentine complex will protect the tooth during loading and mastication.
Different treatment protocols for pulp regeneration were reported in the literature regarding irrigation (type, concentration and time), intracanal medication, pulpal space barrier, incorporation and lack of scaffolds (blood clot, PRP,PRF, collagen) as well as recall visits.
Rationale for conducting the research and choice of comparators:
Multiple visits protocol has been the commonly used technique in regenerative endodontic procedures. It involves the placement of intracanal medicaments between visits (calcium hydroxide and triple antibiotic paste) which have many drawbacks such as difficulty in removal, tooth discoloration, weakening of the root and tooth loss.
Completing revascularization in one visit has many advantages. First, it reduces the chance of additional bacterial contamination of the space. Second, a single revascularization protocol may overcome the problem of poor patient compliance and reduce the number of appointments needed. Third, it can help to combat potential injury of the tooth and tooth discoloration Unfortunately, up till the moment it is not clear which protocol is the most effective. Thus randomized clinical trials are required to provide plausible answers to this question In the present research the recent single visit regenerative treatment for necrotic mature teeth will be compared to the conventionally used two visit one
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single visit pulp regeneration
Regenerative endodontic procedure not involving placement of intracanal medicament will be done in single visit
Single visit pulp regeneration
Access cavity, disinfection, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma, and restoring the tooth all done in one visit.
Two visit pulp regeneration
Regenerative endodontic procedure involving placing intracanal medicament will be done in two visit
Two visit pulp regeneration
first visit : access, disinfection and placing calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament second visit: re opening of tooth, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma and restoring the tooth.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single visit pulp regeneration
Access cavity, disinfection, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma, and restoring the tooth all done in one visit.
Two visit pulp regeneration
first visit : access, disinfection and placing calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament second visit: re opening of tooth, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma and restoring the tooth.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mature root
* Non vital with radiographic evidence of periapical lesion
* Periapical lesion of average size 2-5mm
* Positive patient compliance for participation in the study.
* Patients with good oral hygiene
* Normal periodontal probing depth ≤ 3 mm
Exclusion Criteria
* Non restorable teeth
* Vital teeth
* Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption.
* Roots showing fracture or ankylosis
* Medically compromised patients
* Pregnant women
* Greater than grade I mobility or periodontal probing depth greater than 3mm
* Immature tooth
* Patients with pain, swelling or fistula tracts
15 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
lamiaa Mohamed Ragaei Lasheen
Assistant lecturer of endodontics
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lasheen LR, Gawdat SI, Lutfy RA. Success Rate of Single Versus Two-Visit Regenerative Treatment Protocol in Non-Vital Mature Anterior Teeth (A Preliminary Randomised Clinical Trial). Aust Endod J. 2025 Aug;51(2):308-316. doi: 10.1111/aej.12943. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Faculty of dentistry 2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.