Success Rate of Single Versus Two Visit Regenerative Treatment Protocol in Non Vital Mature Anterior Teeth

NCT ID: NCT03717337

Last Updated: 2018-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates success rate of non vital mature anterior teeth with periapical lesion treated by regenerative endodontic protocol in single visit versus two visit technique.

Patients are randomized into two groups where treatment will be done either in one visit including access, disinfection, placing platelet rich plasma as scaffold and restoration or two visit protocol involving access, disinfection and placing calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament in first visit followed by a second visit after 3 weeks involving reopening of the tooth, removing intracanal medicament and placing platelet rich plasma as scaffold then restoration. Success rate is defined as absence of subjective signs and symptoms along with healing of periapical lesion

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Title: Evaluation of Success Rate of Non Vital Mature Anterior Teeth with Periapical Lesion Following Single versus Two Visit Regenerative Treatment Protocol (A Randomized Clinical Trial) Regenerative endodontics can be defined as biologically based procedures designed to replace damaged structures, including dentin and root structures, as well as cells of the pulp-dentin complex.

The majority of endodontic patients are adults, thus the application of the tissue engineering concept to mature teeth could provide a biological treatment modality instead of the conventional one. In fact, several advantages were reported about regenerative procedures in well developed mature teeth. Reconstitution of the neurovascular system in root canals by pulp regeneration will provide pulp tissues with an immune system, which will function as the first line of defense against microbial challenge. Moreover, restoration of pulp dentine complex will protect the tooth during loading and mastication.

Different treatment protocols for pulp regeneration were reported in the literature regarding irrigation (type, concentration and time), intracanal medication, pulpal space barrier, incorporation and lack of scaffolds (blood clot, PRP,PRF, collagen) as well as recall visits.

Rationale for conducting the research and choice of comparators:

Multiple visits protocol has been the commonly used technique in regenerative endodontic procedures. It involves the placement of intracanal medicaments between visits (calcium hydroxide and triple antibiotic paste) which have many drawbacks such as difficulty in removal, tooth discoloration, weakening of the root and tooth loss.

Completing revascularization in one visit has many advantages. First, it reduces the chance of additional bacterial contamination of the space. Second, a single revascularization protocol may overcome the problem of poor patient compliance and reduce the number of appointments needed. Third, it can help to combat potential injury of the tooth and tooth discoloration Unfortunately, up till the moment it is not clear which protocol is the most effective. Thus randomized clinical trials are required to provide plausible answers to this question In the present research the recent single visit regenerative treatment for necrotic mature teeth will be compared to the conventionally used two visit one

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulp Necrosis Periapical Lesion Anterior Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The design of this randomized clinical trial is a parallel group two arms trial with 1:1 allocation ratio
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
single

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single visit pulp regeneration

Regenerative endodontic procedure not involving placement of intracanal medicament will be done in single visit

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single visit pulp regeneration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Access cavity, disinfection, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma, and restoring the tooth all done in one visit.

Two visit pulp regeneration

Regenerative endodontic procedure involving placing intracanal medicament will be done in two visit

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Two visit pulp regeneration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

first visit : access, disinfection and placing calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament second visit: re opening of tooth, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma and restoring the tooth.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single visit pulp regeneration

Access cavity, disinfection, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma, and restoring the tooth all done in one visit.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two visit pulp regeneration

first visit : access, disinfection and placing calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicament second visit: re opening of tooth, preparing and injecting platelet rich plasma and restoring the tooth.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Single canal anterior tooth

* Mature root
* Non vital with radiographic evidence of periapical lesion
* Periapical lesion of average size 2-5mm
* Positive patient compliance for participation in the study.
* Patients with good oral hygiene
* Normal periodontal probing depth ≤ 3 mm

Exclusion Criteria

* Compromised remaining tooth structure that need post and core build up
* Non restorable teeth
* Vital teeth
* Radiographic evidence of external or internal root resorption.
* Roots showing fracture or ankylosis
* Medically compromised patients
* Pregnant women
* Greater than grade I mobility or periodontal probing depth greater than 3mm
* Immature tooth
* Patients with pain, swelling or fistula tracts
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

lamiaa Mohamed Ragaei Lasheen

Assistant lecturer of endodontics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lasheen LR, Gawdat SI, Lutfy RA. Success Rate of Single Versus Two-Visit Regenerative Treatment Protocol in Non-Vital Mature Anterior Teeth (A Preliminary Randomised Clinical Trial). Aust Endod J. 2025 Aug;51(2):308-316. doi: 10.1111/aej.12943. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40219648 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Faculty of dentistry 2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.