Professional Consequences of Ocular Trauma Hospitalized at the Hospital Centre of Clermont-Ferrand
NCT ID: NCT03706560
Last Updated: 2018-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-06-18
2023-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The primary objective is to study the professional reclassification of workers at least 6 months after their hospitalization for ocular trauma.
Secondary objectives are to assess, at least 6 months after an hospitalized ocular trauma, characteristics of eye injuries, characteristics of patients, mid-term consequences at work after eye injury and on personal aspects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pupillometry for the Prediction of Neurologic Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02465242
Visual Discomfort and Reading
NCT00402155
Pupillometry Use & Professional's Inspection : Leveling Subjectivity
NCT06733207
Early Detection and Prevention of Amblyopia and Visual Impairment Through Systematic Pediatric Vision Screening
NCT07112560
Rehabilitation For Acquired Visual Field Defects: Development Of A Bottom-Up Approach
NCT01730560
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At least 6 months after the traumatism, an ophthalmologist member of the team, M. Vincent Jawad, will call each patient for answering a telephone questionnaire after obtention of his oral consent.
If the traumatism occur after the beginning of the study, the patient will be informed, by M. Vincent Jawad, of the modalities of the study during his hospitalization and an information letter will be given to the patient in the same time (annex 2). His non opposition will be asked by telephone, remote from the hospitalization, before proceeding to the telephone questionnaire.
If the traumatism occur before the beginning of the study or if the information and non opposition letter has not been given to the patient during the hospitalization, the information letter (annex 2) will be sent by mail to the patient before the telephone call.
In all cases, the patient's consent (or non opposition) will be collected orally before proceeding to the telephone questionnaire (annex 1).
Medical data will be obtained from the medical report of hospitalization and the last report consultation of his ophthalmologist.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* hospitalized for ocular trauma in the ophthalmology unit of the University Hospital of Clermont-ferrand
* from january the first of 2005 to december the 31st of 2022.
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal to participate in the study
* Unable to answer to the telephone questionnaire (difficulties understanding, cognitive disorders…)
* Impossibility to contact the patient
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frédéric DUTHEIL, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Negrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;5(3):143-69. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.3.143.8364.
Xiang H, Stallones L, Chen G, Smith GA. Work-related eye injuries treated in hospital emergency departments in the US. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Jul;48(1):57-62. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20179.
Pizzarello LD. Ocular trauma: time for action. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;5(3):115-6. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.3.115.8366. No abstract available.
Pinna A, Atzeni G, Patteri P, Salvo M, Zanetti F, Carta F. Epidemiology, visual outcome, and hospitalization costs of open globe injury in northern Sardinia, Italy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):299-305. doi: 10.1080/09286580701198753.
Byhr E. Perforating eye injuries in a western part of Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Feb;72(1):91-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02744.x.
Schrader WF. [Epidemiology of open globe eye injuries: analysis of 1026 cases in 18 years]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Aug;221(8):629-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813254. German.
Casson RJ, Walker JC, Newland HS. Four-year review of open eye injuries at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;30(1):15-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00484.x.
Tielsch JM, Parver L, Shankar B. Time trends in the incidence of hospitalized ocular trauma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Apr;107(4):519-23. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010533025.
Parver LM, Dannenberg AL, Blacklow B, Fowler CJ, Brechner RJ, Tielsch JM. Characteristics and causes of penetrating eye injuries reported to the National Eye Trauma System Registry, 1985-91. Public Health Rep. 1993 Sep-Oct;108(5):625-32.
Thylefors B. Epidemiological patterns of ocular trauma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1992 May;20(2):95-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1992.tb00718.x.
Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, Pillitteri F, Cillino G. A five-year retrospective study of the epidemiological characteristics and visual outcomes of patients hospitalized for ocular trauma in a Mediterranean area. BMC Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr 22;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-8-6.
Forrest KY, Cali JM. Epidemiology of lifetime work-related eye injuries in the U.S. population associated with one or more lost days of work. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):156-62. doi: 10.1080/09286580902738175.
Baillif S, Paoli V. [Open-globe injuries and intraocular foreign bodies involving the posterior segment]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2012 Feb;35(2):136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2011.08.003. Epub 2012 Jan 9. French.
Yuksel H, Turkcu FM, Ahin M, Cinar Y, Cingu AK, Ozkurt Z, Bez Y, Caca H. Vision-related quality of life in patients after ocular penetrating injuries. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Apr;77(2):95-8. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140024.
Alexander DA, Kemp RV, Klein S, Forrester JV. Psychiatric sequelae and psychosocial adjustment following ocular trauma: a retrospective pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 May;85(5):560-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.5.560.
Schrader WF. Open globe injuries: epidemiological study of two eye clinics in Germany, 1981-1999. Croat Med J. 2004 Jun;45(3):268-74.
Rofail M, Lee GA, O'Rourke P. Quality of life after open-globe injury. Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):1057.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.042. No abstract available.
Chandola T, Britton A, Brunner E, Hemingway H, Malik M, Kumari M, Badrick E, Kivimaki M, Marmot M. Work stress and coronary heart disease: what are the mechanisms? Eur Heart J. 2008 Mar;29(5):640-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm584. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
Chikani V, Reding D, Gunderson P, McCarty CA. Psychosocial work characteristics predict cardiovascular disease risk factors and health functioning in rural women: the Wisconsin Rural Women's Health Study. J Rural Health. 2005 Fall;21(4):295-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00098.x.
Collins SM, Karasek RA, Costas K. Job strain and autonomic indices of cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Ind Med. 2005 Sep;48(3):182-93. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20204.
de Jonge J, Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J. Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med. 2000 May;50(9):1317-27. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00388-3.
Evans S, Huxley P, Gately C, Webber M, Mears A, Pajak S, Medina J, Kendall T, Katona C. Mental health, burnout and job satisfaction among mental health social workers in England and Wales. Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;188:75-80. doi: 10.1192/bjp.188.1.75.
Goldstone AR, Callaghan CJ, Mackay J, Charman S, Nashef SA. Should surgeons take a break after an intraoperative death? Attitude survey and outcome evaluation. BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37985.371343.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 20.
Karasek R, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694-705. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.694.
Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322.
McGonagle AK, Fisher GG, Barnes-Farrell JL, Grosch JW. Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):376-98. doi: 10.1037/a0037974. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27-41. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.27.
Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336-42. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1336.
Pisanti R, van der Doef M, Maes S, Lazzari D, Bertini M. Job characteristics, organizational conditions, and distress/well-being among Italian and Dutch nurses: a cross-national comparison. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jul;48(7):829-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
Pomaki G, Maes S, Ter Doest L. Work conditions and employees' self-set goals: goal processes enhance prediction of psychological distress and well-being. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Jun;30(6):685-94. doi: 10.1177/0146167204263970.
Schnall PL, Pieper C, Schwartz JE, Karasek RA, Schlussel Y, Devereux RB, Ganau A, Alderman M, Warren K, Pickering TG. The relationship between 'job strain,' workplace diastolic blood pressure, and left ventricular mass index. Results of a case-control study. JAMA. 1990 Apr 11;263(14):1929-35.
Woo M, Yap AK, Oh TG, Long FY. The relationship between stress and absenteeism. Singapore Med J. 1999 Sep;40(9):590-5.
Nielsen ML, Rugulies R, Smith-Hansen L, Christensen KB, Kristensen TS. Psychosocial work environment and registered absence from work: estimating the etiologic fraction. Am J Ind Med. 2006 Mar;49(3):187-96. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20252.
Shelledy DC, Mikles SP, May DF, Youtsey JW. Analysis of job satisfaction, burnout, and intent of respiratory care practitioners to leave the field or the job. Respir Care. 1992 Jan;37(1):46-60.
Rusli BN, Edimansyah BA, Naing L. Working conditions, self-perceived stress, anxiety, depression and quality of life: a structural equation modelling approach. BMC Public Health. 2008 Feb 6;8:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-48.
Rosengren A, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Sliwa K, Zubaid M, Almahmeed WA, Blackett KN, Sitthi-amorn C, Sato H, Yusuf S; INTERHEART investigators. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):953-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17019-0.
Richardson S, Shaffer JA, Falzon L, Krupka D, Davidson KW, Edmondson D. Meta-analysis of perceived stress and its association with incident coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 15;110(12):1711-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
Hilton MF, Whiteford HA. Associations between psychological distress, workplace accidents, workplace failures and workplace successes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2010 Dec;83(8):923-33. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0555-x. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
Siegrist J, Klein D, Voigt KH. Linking sociological with physiological data: the model of effort-reward imbalance at work. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:112-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-A00605-50
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CHU-399
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.