Performance, Safety and Efficacy of PICO Device.

NCT ID: NCT03698968

Last Updated: 2019-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-06

Study Completion Date

2019-06-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is being conducted to evaluate the safe and effective use of the PICO 7 system in surgically closed incision sites and wounds requiring closure by skin graft or flap as part of the PMCF plan for this product, for the purpose of continuing CE (Conformité Européene) Mark approval in accordance with MEDDEV 2.12-2

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although evidence exists which supports the positive effects of NPWT on take of skin grafts and flaps, there is limited evidence in relation to single-use systems such as PICO. Most previous studies have used traditional NPWT systems as part of their design. Though the technical applications of the traditional and newer single-use systems are comparable it is possible that some of the features of the latter may influence clinical outcomes. In addition to the limitations highlighted above, the cited studies have seldom assessed the ease of management and acceptability of NPWT systems. Although clinical outcomes may be considered paramount, these usability factors could also play a key role in ensuring compliance with negative pressure protocols.

Although evidence exists which supports the positive effects of NPWT on take of skin grafts and flaps, there is limited evidence in relation to single-use systems such as PICO. Most previous studies have used traditional NPWT systems as part of their design. Though the technical applications of the traditional and newer single-use systems are comparable it is possible that some of the features of the latter may influence clinical outcomes. In addition to the limitations highlighted above, the cited studies have seldom assessed the ease of management and acceptability of NPWT systems. Although clinical outcomes may be considered paramount, these usability factors could also play a key role in ensuring compliance with negative pressure protocols.

The study is being conducted to evaluate the safe and effective use of the PICO 7 system in surgically closed incision sites and wounds requiring closure by skin graft or flap as part of the PMCF plan for this product, for the purpose of continuing CE (Conformité Européene) Mark approval in accordance with MEDDEV 2.12-2.

The PICO system has recently been updated with minor modifications that make the system silent during wear. S \& N also wish to collect PMCF data in the indications of knee and abdominal incisions in order to make retrospective comparisons with data previously collected for these indications.

The aim of this study is therefore to assess whether the PICO 7 system is a safe and effective therapy for surgically closed incisions, skin grafts and flaps. Effectiveness will be defined by the ability of the system to deliver negative pressure and handle exudate and by percentage of successful skin graft or flap survival at Day 14.

A summary of known and potential risks and benefits to humans of each test article can be found in the Instructions for Use of PICO 7.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wound Heal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Open

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single prospective intervention

Group Type OTHER

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single use disposable negative pressure system. The system is capable of delivering up to 80 mm Hg negative pressure to a wound or surgical incision site and managing low to moderate levels of exudate or fluid generated by the wound or incision. The therapy may be administered for up to 1 week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Single use disposable negative pressure system. The system is capable of delivering up to 80 mm Hg negative pressure to a wound or surgical incision site and managing low to moderate levels of exudate or fluid generated by the wound or incision. The therapy may be administered for up to 1 week.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subject must provide written informed consent
* Subjects eighteen (18) years of age or older.
* Willing and able to make all required study visits.
* Able to follow instructions.
* Subject is suitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the Investigator
* Subject has a suitable, closed abdominal or knee surgery incision skin flap or skin graft (STSG, meshed or non-meshed) (if there is more than one incision then the clinician should choose the one which in their opinion is most suited to PICO therapy), that fits under the absorbent dressing area of the appropriate PICO 7 dressing supplied.

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications (per the PICO 7 IFU) or hypersensitivity to the use of the investigational product or their components (e.g. silicone adhesives and polyurethane films \[direct contact with incision\], acrylic adhesives \[direct contact with skin\], polyethylene fabrics and super-absorbent powders \[polyacrylates\]) within the dressing).
* Subjects with extremely fragile skin who require the use of SECURA non-sting barrier skin wipes and have hypersensitivity to the ingredients in the wipes
* Participation in the treatment period of another clinical trial within thirty (30) days of operative visit or during the study.
* Subjects with skin features (e.g. tattoos, skin colour, pre-existing scarring) which in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study assessments.
* Patients undergoing a procedure as part of palliative care (to be confirmed during surgery).
* Subjects with incisions or skin grafts that are actively bleeding unless haemostasis has been achieved (to be confirmed during surgery).
* Subjects with infected skin grafts or incisions at the time of surgery (except for those with perforated bowel or peritonitis).
* Subjects who have participated previously in this clinical trial
* Subjects with a history of poor compliance with medical treatment.
* Subjects with skin grafts to correct pressure ulcers where compression therapy is needed for healing (based on clinicians expertise).
* Subjects with a medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude safe subject participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rachael Winter

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

T.J. Smith & Nephew, LTD

Sudheer Karlakki

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ospedale Regionale di Lugano; Sede Ospedale Italiano

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status

Mid Essex Hospital Services

Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

The Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation

Oswestry, Shropshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Queen Victoria Hospital

East Grinstead, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital

Margate, , United Kingdom

Site Status

North Tyneside General Hospital

North Shields, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital

Norwich, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Peterborough City Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust

Peterborough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Mid-Yorkshire NHS Trust

Wakefield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CT1703PC7

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.