Treatment of Chronic Wounds With Cold Plasma -Plasma Care® vs. Placebo
NCT ID: NCT07050667
Last Updated: 2025-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-01
2024-12-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Method: A prospective, multicenter, two-arm, randomized, single-blind clinical trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of plasma care® versus placebo, both combined with best practice wound care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Cold Plasma in Chronic Wound Healing
NCT06964048
Cold atmOspheric plaSMa Therapy Versus standArd Wound Care in Diabetic Foot and Venous Leg ulcerS
NCT07251426
Cold Plasma Jet kINPen Med Versus Best Practice Wound Dressings
NCT04965805
Registry Trial of the Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma for Chronic Non-Healing Wounds
NCT02071979
Plasma on Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration
NCT05855499
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has recently emerged as a promising treatment. CAP is created by ionizing gas with strong electric fields, producing reactive species that stimulate human cell regeneration while also exhibiting strong antibacterial and antifungal effects-even against antibiotic-resistant strains. This dual action makes CAP especially useful for chronic wounds, which are prone to infections.
CAP also benefits wound healing by lowering wound pH. Chronic wounds often have an alkaline environment conducive to bacterial growth, but CAP shifts the pH toward more acidic levels, supporting cell function and antibacterial activity.
Clinical studies have shown CAP significantly improves wound healing by promoting granulation tissue formation, reducing wound size and infection, and alleviating symptoms like redness and itching. CAP has also proven safe, with no mutagenic effects on healthy cells.
Different technologies exist to generate CAP, including Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD), Plasma Jet, and Surface Micro Discharge (SMD). The plasma care® device used in this study is based on SMD technology, allowing mobile, gas-free use to treat areas up to 13 cm², with treatment dose determined by application duration.
This study aims to evaluate whether plasma care® provides significantly better healing outcomes in chronic wounds of various types compared to placebo treatment. It also seeks to understand the impact of CAP on wound healing factors such as infection control, pH reduction, and exudate management, alongside patient experiences like pain and tolerability. If successful, this study could establish plasma care® as a valuable new option in chronic wound therapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plasma arm
Treatment of patients with cold atmospheric plasma
Cold atmospheric plasma
Treatment of chronic wounds with cold plasma
Placebo arm
Placebo control
Placebo treatment
Treatment of chronic wounds with the placebo device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cold atmospheric plasma
Treatment of chronic wounds with cold plasma
Placebo treatment
Treatment of chronic wounds with the placebo device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of chronic wounds of any origin and wound phase (Includes locally infected wounds)
* Wound size up to 20 x 10 cm (If multiple wounds are present, one wound is designated as the study wound)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients on ongoing systemic antibiotic therapy or who received antibiotics within 1 week prior to study start
* Patients who participated in another study within one month prior to this study
* Patients with acute wounds
* Wounds with visible tendons and bones
* Wounds with more than 30% dry necrosis
* Allergy or intolerance to cold plasma
* Patients with wounds covered by primary or secondary dressings
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Terraplasma Medical GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
LKH Bregenz
Bregenz, , Austria
LKH Feldkirch
Feldkirch, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PLASMACARE/70/Q1-23
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EK-2-3/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.