Patient Pathway Pharmacist - Optimal Drug-related Care

NCT ID: NCT03695081

Last Updated: 2023-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-03

Study Completion Date

2023-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medication errors represent the most common cause of patient injury and one of the most frequently reported health related deviation in Norway. The addition of a dedicated clinical pharmacist throughout the hip fracture patient pathway (patient pathway pharmacist) is believed to improve patient safety and ensure optimal drug-related patient care. The pharmacist will perform medication reconciliation at admission to hospital, medication review after surgery and assist physicians with discharge summary. Six weeks after discharge the patient pathway pharmacist will perform a second drug reconciliation and medication review. This study will assess the pharmacists' place and specific tasks in the patient pathway, describe areas where the pharmacist contribute to increased quality of care and assess the benefits and/or disadvantages experienced with introducing a patient pathway pharmacist. The estimated number of patients included is 60. Current practice will be determined by investigating the last 50 patients' medical record and a questionnaire to health care professionals involved in treatment of hip fracture patients. Data from medication reconciliation and drug review will be collected and compared to current practice. After the inclusion period, focus group surveys and/or semi-structured interviews will be executed to describe the perceived improvement in the quality of care. Primary endpoints are: 1) Medication reconciliation score at admission 2) Number of inappropriate drugs for elderly 3) Discharge summary score 4) Discharge summaries following procedure. Secondary endpoints are readmissions and mortality after 30 and 90 days. Qualitative endpoints: 1) Health care professionals experience of current drug-related practice 2) Experienced advantages and disadvantages of a patient pathway pharmacist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures Aging Patient Fall

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

An intervention group is compared to a cross-sectional retrospective group.

A group of 60 patients with hip fracture will get an intervention by a clinical pharmacist who performs medication reconciliation and medication review during hospitalisation, they will receive a discharge summary where the medication part is optimised. After six weeks the patients will be get a follow-up with a second medication reconciliation and - review. This group will be compared with the last 50 patients with hip fracture who did not get the intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention

1. Medication reconciliation at admission to hospital
2. Medication review post surgery
3. Optimised list of drugs in the discharge summary, in accordance with hospital procedures
4. Medication reconciliation, six weeks after discharge
5. Medication review, six weeks after discharge

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

1. Medication reconciliation at admission to hospital
2. Medication review post surgery
3. Optimised list of drugs in the discharge summary, in accordance with hospital procedures
4. Medication reconciliation, six weeks after discharge
5. Medication review, six weeks after discharge

No intervention

Business as usual. The Patient Pathway Pharmacist is not involved and the nurses and physicians are responsible for medicine reconciliation, -review and section in the discharge summary.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient Pathway Pharmacist intervention

1. Medication reconciliation at admission to hospital
2. Medication review post surgery
3. Optimised list of drugs in the discharge summary, in accordance with hospital procedures
4. Medication reconciliation, six weeks after discharge
5. Medication review, six weeks after discharge

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hip fracture patients in Vestfold county, Norway

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under 18 years
* Terminally ill
* Hip fracture patients who do not follow the standardized patient pathway at Vestfold Regional Hospital
* Patients who do not consent to be included in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Pharmacy Enterprise, South Eastern Norway

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sykehuset i Vestfold HF

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ben Tore Henriksen

Clinical Pharmacist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vestfold Hospital Trust

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Henriksen BT, Krogseth M, Andersen RD, Davies MN, Nguyen CT, Mathiesen L, Andersson Y. Clinical pharmacist intervention to improve medication safety for hip fracture patients through secondary and primary care settings: a nonrandomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 13;18(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03906-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37312222 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

59475

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.