NBI Versus White Light Endoscopy for Optical Characterization of Neoplastic Polyps in the Colorectum
NCT ID: NCT03679429
Last Updated: 2018-09-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
370 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-11-30
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study we want to investigate whether the use of narrow-band imaging (NBI) would be capable to rise accuracy of optical polyp predictions compared to standard HD white light endoscopy. NBI is a light filter tool which can be activated by pressing a button at the endoscope. The use of NBI leads to an endoscopic picture which appears blue and enables endoscopists to better assess surface structures and vascular patterns.
In a prospective randomised multicenter setting we plan to conduct colonoscopy in 370 patients. Half of the patients will be examined without the use of NBI (control arm). In these cases colonoscopists will assess optical diagnosis of polyps without turning on the NBI tool. If polyps are detected in patients belonging to the intervention arm NBI will be used and optical diagnosis will be determined using the WASP (Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis) classification. All polyps will be resected and send to pathology for further microscopic assessment. After completing the trial we aim to compare accuracy of the optical diagnosis in both groups. Our hypothesis is, that by using NBI accordance between optical and histopathological diagnosis can be increased from 80% to 90%.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accuracy of the Optical Diagnosis of Small Colonic Polyps Using the Nice Classification
NCT02009774
Computer Aided Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms During Colonoscopic Examination
NCT03069833
Acetic Acid for Optical Characterization of Colonic Polyps
NCT02760381
Practice-Based Learning to Predict Polyp Histology at Colonoscopy
NCT01638091
Blue Laser Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonic Polyps
NCT03421600
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Patients from the control group will be examined using a CF-HQ 190 EVIS Exera III Advanced Diagnostic Video Colonoscope. If colon polyps are detected optical diagnosis will be determined WITHOUT using the NBI function of the scope.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention
Patients from the control group will be examined using a CF-HQ 190 EVIS Exera III Advanced Diagnostic Video Colonoscope. If colon polyps are detected optical diagnosis will be determined by using the NBI function of the scope.
NBI Function
In the intervention arm polyps will be optically characterized using the NBI function. The WASP (Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis) classification will be used in order to determine the optical diagnosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NBI Function
In the intervention arm polyps will be optically characterized using the NBI function. The WASP (Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis) classification will be used in order to determine the optical diagnosis.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age ≥ 40 years
* written consent given by patient
Exclusion Criteria
* patients denying written consent
* pregnant women
* ASA class IV, V and VI
* known contraindication for polyp resection
* indication for colonoscopy: preknown adenoma/polyp/carcinoma or inflammatory bowel disease
* indication for colonoscopy: emergency (e.g. severe rectal bleeding)
40 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Technical University of Munich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter Klare
Dr. med. Peter Klare
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Klare, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Roland M Schmid, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Timo Rath, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Jan Peveling-Oberhag, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Robert Bosch-Krankenhaus Stuttgart
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinik für Innere Medizin II am Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 1
Erlangen, , Germany
Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus
Stuttgart, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ADOPTION II
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.