The Impact of Prolonged Standing on Musculoskeletal Pain

NCT ID: NCT03678623

Last Updated: 2021-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-23

Study Completion Date

2019-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study using a biopsychosocial approach to investigate office workers at risk of standing-induced musculoskeletal pain. The purpose of this study is to determine which factors are associated with developing or worsening of musculoskeletal pain (changes in the Visual Analogue Scale from baseline) during a 60 minute standing paradigm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background/rationale

There is growing national and international evidence for the negative health impact of sedentary behaviour at work. A strategy being increasingly adopted to reduce prolonged sitting is to spend some of the work day in standing. However, for some adults, prolonged standing is associated with the development of musculoskeletal pain. We are investigating which factors are associated with developing of musculoskeletal pain during standing when using a height-adjustable desk. Previous studies have used an induced-pain paradigm to understand risk factors for developing musculoskeletal pain during a prolonged standing task that simulates the work environment (standing paradigm). Identifying those office workers who are at risk of developing musculoskeletal pain during standing will provide information to guide health professionals and individuals in making decisions about optimal workstation design.

Objectives and hypothesis

* Cross-sectional study: Identify which factors are associated (demographic, physical, psychological and work-related factors) with standing-induced musculoskeletal pain in office workers during a standing paradigm.
* Prospective cohort study: Identify incidence/prevalence and risk factors of low back pain, and disability associated with low back pain in office workers in a 1-year prospective cohort.

Methods

* Setting, locations and relevant dates: testing is conducted in the University of Queensland (Brisbane, Australia). Data collection commenced in May of 2018 until 30th of April of 2019 (cross-sectional study); and follow-up is from June of 2018 until 30th of April of 2020 (prospective cohort study).
* Participants: recruitment is through posting flyers on campus of The University of Queensland; through the weekly electronic university staff newsletter at this University; and through Facebook announcements. Interested participants were directed to an online questionnaire (hosted by Survey Monkey) to determine eligibility. Participants meeting the eligibility criteria were contacted via email to schedule an appointment.
* Variables: see "outcomes measures".
* Study size: a convenience sample of 40 office workers will be recruited. Based on previous studies that have compared developers and non-developers of standing-induced low back pain, this sample size was considered sufficient to detect a significant difference in some of the physical outcome measures such as lumbar lordosis (Sorensen et al. 2015a); trunk muscle activation (Ringheim et al. 2015) and active hip abduction (Nelson-Wong et al. 2008).
* Statistical analysis: subjects will be separated into Pain Developers (PDs) and Non-Pain Developers (NPDs). A Chi-square analysis or a Fisher's Exact test will be conducted to test for differences in the distribution of qualitative and proportional variables in PDs and NPDs. Independent groups t-tests, will be conducted to test for differences in quantitative variables between PDs and NPDs. A Pearson correlation coefficient and one-way analysis of variance test will be conducted to test for differences for average Visual Analogue Score (VAS). A simple linear regression analysis will be performed to examine the degree to which biopsychosocial variables predict PDs. Statistical analyses will be performed in SPSS version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY).Statistical significance for all tests will be set at p ≤ 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Musculoskeletal Pain Occupational Exposure Office Workers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Office-based workers

Individuals working in an office environment with their main tasks involving use of a computer, reading, phoning, making presentations and participating in meetings, who perform more than 30 hours per week mostly sitting at a computer.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Office-based workers who perform more than 30 hours per week mostly sitting at a computer,
* With aged 18 or above.

Exclusion Criteria

* not office-based workers,
* pregnant or less than six months postpartum,
* had experienced any major trauma or had surgery to the spine or lower limb over the last 12 months,
* had been diagnosed with any neurological or systematic pathology (such as rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis or ankyloses spondylitis).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Queensland

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidade da Coruña

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero

Principal Investigator. PhD, MSc, PT. Lecturer at Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universidade da Coruña.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Venerina Johnston, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The University of Queensland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Queensland

Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Neuhaus M, Eakin EG, Straker L, Owen N, Dunstan DW, Reid N, Healy GN. Reducing occupational sedentary time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations. Obes Rev. 2014 Oct;15(10):822-38. doi: 10.1111/obr.12201. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25040784 (View on PubMed)

Coenen P, Parry S, Willenberg L, Shi JW, Romero L, Blackwood DM, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Straker LM. Associations of prolonged standing with musculoskeletal symptoms-A systematic review of laboratory studies. Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28863296 (View on PubMed)

Sorensen CJ, Johnson MB, Callaghan JP, George SZ, Van Dillen LR. Validity of a Paradigm for Low Back Pain Symptom Development During Prolonged Standing. Clin J Pain. 2015 Jul;31(7):652-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000148.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25171636 (View on PubMed)

Marshall PW, Patel H, Callaghan JP. Gluteus medius strength, endurance, and co-activation in the development of low back pain during prolonged standing. Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Feb;30(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.08.017. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21227522 (View on PubMed)

Nelson-Wong E, Gregory DE, Winter DA, Callaghan JP. Gluteus medius muscle activation patterns as a predictor of low back pain during standing. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Jun;23(5):545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18282648 (View on PubMed)

Zamkova MA, Krivitskaia EI. [The effect of radiation by erythema-uviol lamps on the working capacity of students]. Gig Sanit. 1966 Apr;31(4):41-4. No abstract available. Russian.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4384659 (View on PubMed)

Sorensen CJ, Norton BJ, Callaghan JP, Hwang CT, Van Dillen LR. Is lumbar lordosis related to low back pain development during prolonged standing? Man Ther. 2015 Aug;20(4):553-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25637464 (View on PubMed)

Ringheim I, Austein H, Indahl A, Roeleveld K. Postural strategy and trunk muscle activation during prolonged standing in chronic low back pain patients. Gait Posture. 2015 Oct;42(4):584-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26404082 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Standing-musculoskeletal pain

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Seating Posture and Its Relation to Pain
NCT06579131 NOT_YET_RECRUITING