Efficacy of Pain Science Education Combined With Exercise in Older Adults With Chronic Pain
NCT ID: NCT07287501
Last Updated: 2026-01-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-01
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is part of a project called PReGe, which aims to help older adults age actively and healthily through preventive physiotherapy. The goal is to determine whether a combination of adapted exercise and education about how pain works can help improve the lives of those who suffer from it.
The study is supported by the City Council of Salamanca and the Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, and it is carried out in collaboration with the Doctoral Program in Health, Disability, Dependency, and Well-being at the University of Salamanca.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a program that combines physical exercise with educational sessions about pain is more effective for adults over 65 years of age with chronic pain, compared to doing exercise alone. The study aims to find out whether this program improves pain, understanding of pain, mobility, quality of life and Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG).
This is a medical research study involving participants aged 65 years or older who have experienced pain for more than three months, with an intensity of at least 3 on a 0-to-10 scale. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups, each following a different type of program:
Group 1 (Control Group): will perform only adapted physical exercise. Group 2: will perform the same physical exercise and attend educational sessions about pain for 8 weeks.
Group 3: will also perform the physical exercise and attend the educational sessions, but for a period of 32 weeks.
The study will last for one full year. The exercise program will be supervised by physiotherapists, carried out over 32 weeks, three times per week, with each session lasting approximately 50 minutes. The educational sessions on pain will be brief-about 15 minutes each-and will take place immediately before the exercise sessions.
During the first two months, there will be two educational talks per week. After the Christmas break, Group 3 will continue with one talk every two weeks until the end of the study.
Three evaluations will be conducted: one before starting the program, another at two months (questionnaires and qEEG only), and a final one at nine months. The initial and final evaluation sessions will last approximately 75 minutes per participant, while the intermediate evaluation of the questionnaires will take about 45 minutes per person.
The evaluators who conduct the assessments will not know which group each participant belongs to, to ensure that the results are as objective as possible.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Neuroscience Education and Physical Exercise Program in Chronic Back Pain
NCT03654235
Effectiveness of Pain Education Elderly Subacromial Pain
NCT04941586
Pain Neuroscience Education in Old Adults.
NCT03523949
Multimodal Physiotherapy and Pain Coping in Primary Care
NCT07299929
Pain Neuroscience Education and Exercise in Institutionalized Older Adults With Pain
NCT03493308
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Personal information and medical history.
Physical condition assessments:
1. Functional assessment: the following tests will be conducted: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Timed Up \& Go (TUG).
2. Muscle strength assessment: the following tests will be performed: handgrip strength test using a JAMAR dynamometer, five-times sit-to-stand test, and force-velocity profiling using an ADR Encoder.
3. Body composition assessment: will be obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), including measurements of body weight, body mass index (BMI), body fat, visceral fat, appendicular muscle mass, and appendicular mass index.
Questionnaires:
1. Numerical Rating Scale for Pain (NRS)
2. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11SV)
3. Pain Catastrophizing Scale
4. Spanish version of the Graded Chronic Pain Scale
5. SF-12 Health Survey
Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG): (Spectral domain (brain frequencies, absolute and relative power by band), functional connectivity indices (coherence between regions), topographical or localization indices, complexity or temporal dynamics indices).
All assessments will be administered by a trained and blinded physiotherapist under optimal hygiene and safety conditions, using certified equipment and instruments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multicomponent training control group (GC).
The CG implemented a multicomponent training program lasting 32 weeks. Sessions were held three times a week, each lasting 50 minutes. The program included strength, balance, endurance, and mobility training, with individualized intensity adjustments based on progression and perceived exertion, using the Borg scale (\<7) as a reference.
Multicomponent training
The intervention consisted of multicomponent training lasting 32 weeks, with three 50-minute sessions per week. The training included strength, balance, endurance, and mobility exercises, with intensity adjusted according to each participant's individual progression and perceived exertion, using the Borg scale (\<7) as a reference.
Multicomponent training group and ECD for 8 weeks (GI1).
GI1 completed the same multicomponent training as the CG, but supplemented it with an 8-week ECD program. This training consisted of two 15-minute sessions per week (16 classes total), which addressed topics such as the difference between acute and chronic pain, neuroplasticity, the biopsychosocial approach to pain, and the impact on older adults. Supporting information was provided through presentations with images, brochures distributed at key moments, and review questionnaires, concluding with a resource and social support sheet.
Multicomponent training combined with Pain Science Education during 8 weeks
The intervention included multicomponent training, identical to that of the control group, combined with Pain Science Education lasting eight weeks, with two 15-minute sessions per week, totaling 16 sessions (240 minutes). The educational content covered topics such as pain, subjectivity and context, sensory homunculus and neurotag, the difference between acute and chronic pain, the distinction between damage and pain, the impact of chronic pain on older adults, the biopsychosocial approach to pain, exercise for long-term pain, attention and efferent copy, neuroplasticity, and relapses. To support the educational sessions, a PowerPoint with illustrative images and texts was used, along with two leaflets delivered at key points in the program. The first leaflet, titled "Pain Science Education," was provided at the midpoint along with an envelope to store the materials. The second leaflet, "Active Pain Coping," was given during the penultimate session. To reinforce and consolidate learni
Multicomponent training group and ECD for 32 weeks (GI2).
GI2 combined the same multicomponent training as CG with an extended ECD program over 32 weeks. The first 8 weeks included two 15-minute sessions per week, followed by a biweekly session, completing 24 classes. The initial content was the same as GI1, but subsequent sessions reinforced concepts through lectures, videos, role-playing, clinical case studies, and debates. Dietary guidelines, relaxation techniques, and a final guided self-reflection session were also included. The support materials included the same content as GI1, along with cards and resources specific to the dynamics.
Multicomponent training combined with Pain Science Education during 32 weeks
The intervention combined multicomponent training, identical to the control group, with a 32-week Pain Science Education program. Physical training, three 50-minute sessions per week, included strength, balance, endurance, and mobility exercises, with intensity individualized based on progression and perceived exertion (Borg \<7), supervised by physiotherapists. Education consisted of 24 sessions (15 minutes each): two weekly sessions during the first eight weeks and one session every two weeks thereafter. The first 16 sessions covered foundational topics, while the remaining eight reinforced concepts through talks, videos, role playing, problem-based learning, and guided debates. Practical tools included nutrition guidance, relaxation techniques, and a final guided self-reflection. Supporting materials included presentations, leaflets, a projector, and personalized cards for interactive activities.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multicomponent training combined with Pain Science Education during 8 weeks
The intervention included multicomponent training, identical to that of the control group, combined with Pain Science Education lasting eight weeks, with two 15-minute sessions per week, totaling 16 sessions (240 minutes). The educational content covered topics such as pain, subjectivity and context, sensory homunculus and neurotag, the difference between acute and chronic pain, the distinction between damage and pain, the impact of chronic pain on older adults, the biopsychosocial approach to pain, exercise for long-term pain, attention and efferent copy, neuroplasticity, and relapses. To support the educational sessions, a PowerPoint with illustrative images and texts was used, along with two leaflets delivered at key points in the program. The first leaflet, titled "Pain Science Education," was provided at the midpoint along with an envelope to store the materials. The second leaflet, "Active Pain Coping," was given during the penultimate session. To reinforce and consolidate learni
Multicomponent training
The intervention consisted of multicomponent training lasting 32 weeks, with three 50-minute sessions per week. The training included strength, balance, endurance, and mobility exercises, with intensity adjusted according to each participant's individual progression and perceived exertion, using the Borg scale (\<7) as a reference.
Multicomponent training combined with Pain Science Education during 32 weeks
The intervention combined multicomponent training, identical to the control group, with a 32-week Pain Science Education program. Physical training, three 50-minute sessions per week, included strength, balance, endurance, and mobility exercises, with intensity individualized based on progression and perceived exertion (Borg \<7), supervised by physiotherapists. Education consisted of 24 sessions (15 minutes each): two weekly sessions during the first eight weeks and one session every two weeks thereafter. The first 16 sessions covered foundational topics, while the remaining eight reinforced concepts through talks, videos, role playing, problem-based learning, and guided debates. Practical tools included nutrition guidance, relaxation techniques, and a final guided self-reflection. Supporting materials included presentations, leaflets, a projector, and personalized cards for interactive activities.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* History of pain lasting more than 3 months.
* Pain intensity of at least 3 out of 10 on the numeric pain rating scale.
* Ability to understand, speak, and write in Spanish.
Exclusion Criteria
* Psychiatric disorders.
* Uncontrolled systemic or inflammatory conditions.
* Uncontrolled cardiac conditions.
* Any other circumstances deemed by the investigators that could interfere with the study's purpose or conduct.
Elimination Criteria:
\- Attendance below 85% of total sessions.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Salamanca
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Javier Torres Alonso
Graduate in physiotherapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy USAL. Campus Miguel de Unamuno, C. Donantes de Sangre, s/n, 37007 Salamanca
Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Soares Fonseca L, Pereira Silva J, Bastos Souza M, Gabrich Moraes Campos M, de Oliveira Mascarenhas R, de Jesus Silva H, Souza Maximo Pereira L, Xavier Oliveira M, Cunha Oliveira V. Effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy on pain intensity and disability in older people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2023 Sep;32(9):3245-3271. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07857-4. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
Lam N, Green J, Hallas S, Forster A, Crocker TF, Andre D, Ellwood A, Clegg A, Brown L. Mapping review of pain management programmes and psychological therapies for community-dwelling older people living with pain. Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Feb;15(1):33-45. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00871-1. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
Zahari Z, Ishak A, Justine M. The effectiveness of patient education in improving pain, disability and quality of life among older people with low back pain: A systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(2):245-254. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181305.
Watson JA, Ryan CG, Atkinson G, Williamson P, Ellington D, Whittle R, Dixon J, Martin DJ. Inter-Individual Differences in the Responses to Pain Neuroscience Education in Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Pain. 2021 Jan;22(1):9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
Nunez-Cortes R, Salazar-Mendez J, Calatayud J, Malfliet A, Lluch E, Mendez-Rebolledo G, Guzman-Munoz E, Lopez-Bueno R, Suso-Marti L. The optimal dose of pain neuroscience education added to an exercise programme for patients with chronic spinal pain: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Pain. 2024 Jun 1;165(6):1196-1206. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003126. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
Nijs J, Paul van Wilgen C, Van Oosterwijck J, van Ittersum M, Meeus M. How to explain central sensitization to patients with 'unexplained' chronic musculoskeletal pain: practice guidelines. Man Ther. 2011 Oct;16(5):413-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 31.
Sluka KA, Frey-Law L, Hoeger Bement M. Exercise-induced pain and analgesia? Underlying mechanisms and clinical translation. Pain. 2018 Sep;159 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S91-S97. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001235.
Carville S, Constanti M, Kosky N, Stannard C, Wilkinson C; Guideline Committee. Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2021 Apr 21;373:n895. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n895. No abstract available.
Castellini G, Iannicelli V, Briguglio M, Corbetta D, Sconfienza LM, Banfi G, Gianola S. Are clinical practice guidelines for low back pain interventions of high quality and updated? A systematic review using the AGREE II instrument. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):970. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05827-w.
Cai Y, Leveille SG, Shi L, Chen P, You T. Chronic pain and circumstances of falls in community-living older adults: an exploratory study. Age Ageing. 2022 Jan 6;51(1):afab261. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab261.
Lin T, Zhao Y, Xia X, Ge N, Yue J. Association between frailty and chronic pain among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Dec;11(6):945-959. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00382-3. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
Domenichiello AF, Ramsden CE. The silent epidemic of chronic pain in older adults. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 13;93:284-290. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Cimas M, Ayala A, Sanz B, Agullo-Tomas MS, Escobar A, Forjaz MJ. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in European older adults: Cross-national and gender differences. Eur J Pain. 2018 Feb;22(2):333-345. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1123. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
World Population Prospects \[Internet\]. \[cited 2025 Apr 2\].
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
USalamancanº1424
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.