Sedation and Weaning in Children Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT03673683

Last Updated: 2020-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10498 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-05

Study Completion Date

2020-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A UK multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial to determine if a protocol-based intervention incorporating coordinated care with greater nursing involvement to managing sedation and ventilator weaning can reduce the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and is cost effective compared with usual care in children in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mechanical ventilation is a common lifesaving therapy, but the longer a child remains on the ventilator, the more risk they have of developing problems. For this reason, getting the child off the ventilator (called weaning) is an important patient outcome. Sedative drugs are necessary so the child can tolerate the breathing tube, but too much can make them sleepy and delay coming off the ventilator.

In 2014, visits to 24 Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) were conducted and it was found that weaning was usually performed by doctors and occasionally senior nurses, but weaning was not always done the same way and, because everyone was not involved, it was often disjointed.

This study will determine if a coordinated approach by doctors and nurses to optimise sedation and weaning using guidelines will: (a) reduce how long patients are on a ventilator without causing any increased risk; (b) reduce the time children spend in a PICU and the hospital; (c) be cost effective in the NHS; and (d) be easily adopted by staff delivering care.

Children receiving ventilation, except those that will never come off a ventilator, will be weaned using the guidelines. Data collection will start in all PICUs at the same time from the very beginning of the study when they are weaning children according to usual practice. Each month, one unit will be chosen at random and staff will be trained to use the new guidelines. The unit will continue using the new guidelines for the rest of the trial. Outcome data collected before (usual care) and after (intervention) training will be compared. An evaluation of the process of implementing the new intervention will be undertaken. During the process evaluation, study staff will be interviewed about their experiences and views with the new approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventilator Weaning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Stepped wedge, cluster randomized stepped wedge clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care

Sedation and ventilation weaning that is non-protocol-based and primarily medically-driven.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Usual sedation and weaning management that is not protocol based

SANDWICH protocol

A protocol-based intervention for managing sedation and ventilation weaning.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SANDWICH protocol

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A protocol based intervention incorporating co-ordinated care with greater nursing involvement; patient-relevant sedation plans linked to regular assessment using the COMFORT scale; regular assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test; a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SANDWICH protocol

A protocol based intervention incorporating co-ordinated care with greater nursing involvement; patient-relevant sedation plans linked to regular assessment using the COMFORT scale; regular assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test; a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Usual care

Usual sedation and weaning management that is not protocol based

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All children (\> 16 year old) in participating PICUs receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

* Children who would not reach the primary endpoint (tracheostomy in situ; not expected to survive; treatment withdrawal)
* Children who are pregnant, as documented in their medical notes
Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Birmingham

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of the West of England

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Edinburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen's University, Belfast

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bronagh Blackwood

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bronagh Blackwood

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queens University Belfast

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

Belfast, Co. Antrim, United Kingdom

Site Status

Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust

Stoke, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Birmingham Women and Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Newcastle, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Southampton Foundation NHS Trust

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15/04/01

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

B17/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LongVentKids Study
NCT04112459 UNKNOWN
Oxy-PICU Neurodevelopmental Follow-up Study
NCT06734715 NOT_YET_RECRUITING