Sedation and Weaning in Children Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT ID: NCT03673683
Last Updated: 2020-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10498 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-05
2020-03-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reduce Pediatric Sedation to Reduce Mechanical Ventilation Complication in ICU
NCT02040168
Pilot Study for Sedation Interruption in Children
NCT02426320
Protocolized Sedative Weaning VS. Usual Care in Pediatric Critically Ill, RCT
NCT03018977
Sedation Management in Pediatric Patients Supported on Mechanical Ventilation
NCT00142766
SWISH Trial (Strategies for Weaning Infants on Supportive High Flow)
NCT04287959
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2014, visits to 24 Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) were conducted and it was found that weaning was usually performed by doctors and occasionally senior nurses, but weaning was not always done the same way and, because everyone was not involved, it was often disjointed.
This study will determine if a coordinated approach by doctors and nurses to optimise sedation and weaning using guidelines will: (a) reduce how long patients are on a ventilator without causing any increased risk; (b) reduce the time children spend in a PICU and the hospital; (c) be cost effective in the NHS; and (d) be easily adopted by staff delivering care.
Children receiving ventilation, except those that will never come off a ventilator, will be weaned using the guidelines. Data collection will start in all PICUs at the same time from the very beginning of the study when they are weaning children according to usual practice. Each month, one unit will be chosen at random and staff will be trained to use the new guidelines. The unit will continue using the new guidelines for the rest of the trial. Outcome data collected before (usual care) and after (intervention) training will be compared. An evaluation of the process of implementing the new intervention will be undertaken. During the process evaluation, study staff will be interviewed about their experiences and views with the new approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual Care
Sedation and ventilation weaning that is non-protocol-based and primarily medically-driven.
Usual care
Usual sedation and weaning management that is not protocol based
SANDWICH protocol
A protocol-based intervention for managing sedation and ventilation weaning.
SANDWICH protocol
A protocol based intervention incorporating co-ordinated care with greater nursing involvement; patient-relevant sedation plans linked to regular assessment using the COMFORT scale; regular assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test; a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SANDWICH protocol
A protocol based intervention incorporating co-ordinated care with greater nursing involvement; patient-relevant sedation plans linked to regular assessment using the COMFORT scale; regular assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test; a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness
Usual care
Usual sedation and weaning management that is not protocol based
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Children who are pregnant, as documented in their medical notes
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
University College, London
OTHER
University of Birmingham
OTHER
University of Leeds
OTHER
Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit
OTHER
University of the West of England
OTHER
University of Edinburgh
OTHER
Queen's University, Belfast
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bronagh Blackwood
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bronagh Blackwood
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queens University Belfast
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust
Belfast, Co. Antrim, United Kingdom
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Stoke, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
Birmingham Women and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle, , United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Oxford, , United Kingdom
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton Foundation NHS Trust
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15/04/01
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
B17/13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.