DetermInants of Antimicrobial Use aNd De-escalAtion in Critical Care

NCT ID: NCT03664245

Last Updated: 2018-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

2000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-11

Study Completion Date

2018-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy is crucial in the treatment of severe infections in patients with intensive care. Adequate spectrum and appropriate doses are the keys to achieving the therapeutic goal. Despite broad consensus on the spectrum and timing of antimicrobial therapy, antibiotic use varies according to various parameters including choice, dose, method of administration, duration of antibiotic therapy and de-escalation. an empirical attitude.

Therapeutic de-escalation is considered essential for the use of antibiotics and is now clearly established by different consensus. However, routine de-escalation has recently been questioned in a randomized, controlled study that did not demonstrate non-inferiority of de-escalation with an increase in the number of days of antibiotic therapy associated with an increased number of days. superinfection.

The components of the de-escalation described in the literature, are based on the reduction of the number of antibiotics, the strict observance of the spectrum of the antibiotic, the reduction of use of the antibiotic, the stopping of any inappropriate antibiotic treatment ( lack of in vitro activity).

De-escalation can be considered in different ways; there are significant variations between hospitals, countries, teams. A large European multicenter cohort is needed.

The main objective of this study is to describe empiric antibiotic therapy in intensive care and the modalities of de-escalation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy is crucial in the treatment of severe infections in patients with intensive care. Adequate spectrum and appropriate doses are the keys to achieving the therapeutic goal. Despite broad consensus on the spectrum and timing of antimicrobial therapy, antibiotic use varies according to various parameters including choice, dose, method of administration, duration of antibiotic therapy and de-escalation. an empirical attitude.

Therapeutic de-escalation is considered essential for the use of antibiotics and is now clearly established by different consensus. However, routine de-escalation has recently been questioned in a randomized, controlled study that did not demonstrate non-inferiority of de-escalation with an increase in the number of days of antibiotic therapy associated with an increased number of days. superinfection.

The components of the de-escalation described in the literature, are based on the reduction of the number of antibiotics, the strict observance of the spectrum of the antibiotic, the reduction of use of the antibiotic, the stopping of any inappropriate antibiotic treatment ( lack of in vitro activity).

De-escalation can be considered in different ways; there are significant variations between hospitals, countries, teams. A large European multicenter cohort is needed.

The main objective of this study is to describe empiric antibiotic therapy in intensive care and the modalities of de-escalation (rate of de-escalation, incidence of mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit, relapse, rate of superinfection)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Emergencies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

experimental group

Critically ill patients receiving empirical antibiotic therapy for suspected or confirmed infections at the Intensive Care Unit

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older.
* Patient is admitted to an ICU and has an anticipated need of ICU support of at least 48 hours.
* Patient has a suspected or confirmed bacterial infection (community-, healthcare-, hospital- or ICU-acquired).
* Empirical antibiotic therapy is started for this infection at any time in the ICU or no more than 24 hours prior to ICU admission. If the initial antibiotic therapy is considered inadequate and another empirical scheme is chosen at ICU admission, this will be the empirical antibiotic of the study.
* Causative pathogen and susceptibility are unidentified at time of initiation of the antibiotic therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous inclusion in this study for another infection - each patient can only be included once.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

APHM

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille

Marseille, PACA, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

MARC LEONE

Role: CONTACT

+33 491368655

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

MARC LEONE, MD

Role: primary

+33 491368655

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-20

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.