Dexamethasone Blunts the Hypotensive Effect of Spinal Anesthesia in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries
NCT ID: NCT03664037
Last Updated: 2023-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-01
2018-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
IV Dexamethasone in Preventing Post Spinal Hypotension
NCT07052864
Efficacy of Dexamethasone in Attenuation of Postinduction Hypotension in Geriatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
NCT04908592
Effect of Dexamethasone on Post-spinal Hypotension
NCT06819436
Comparison of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Effect in the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03143010
Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Duration of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Abdominal Surgery
NCT04778189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study was designed to be a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded parallel study. Following enrollment, patients were randomized into 2 equal groups; the D group, (n=55) each patient received 8 mg of intravenous DEX diluted in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline \[NS\]) intravenous infusion (IVI) over 15 min 2 hours preoperatively and the C group, (n=55) each patient received 100 mL 0.9% NS IVI over 15 min (Placebo) 2 hours preoperatively. Randomization was done using computer-generated number table of random numbers in a 1:1 ratio in opaque and sealed envelope (SNOSE). The assigned treatment was written on a card and sealed in opaque envelopes consecutively numbered. These envelopes were opened just immediately before infusing the medication in the patient's room. The study drugs were prepared by the hospital pharmacy and follow-up of patients were conducted by the anesthesia residents not involved in any other part of the study.
Patients were prepared by fasting (8 h for solid foods and 4 hours for clear fluids) before anesthesia and were hydrated intravenously before the procedure. Patients were hooked to a portable monitor (Non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry) in their rooms from which baseline measurements (heart rate(HR), systolic(SAP), diastolic(DAP) and mean arterial blood pressure(MAP)) were recorded just before administration of the study medication.
As soon as the patient arrived in the operating room pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram monitoring, and non-invasive arterial pressure measurement were started, and patients were sedated by 1mg of IV midazolam. An18-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted, and slow infusion of 0.9% sodium chloride solution was commenced to keep the vein opened and didn't exceed the volume of 200 mL during the study period (during giving anesthesia and for 20 minutes thereafter). Lumbar puncture was performed with the patient in a sitting position and the subarachnoid space was punctured at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 level using 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle under aseptic condition. After identification of the subarachnoid space3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution (Marcaine® Spinal 0.5% Heavy; Sunny pivacaine, Manufactured by Sunny Pharmaceutical - Cairo - Egypt) were injected over 60 seconds.
Immediately after completing the subarachnoid injection, patients were positioned supine on the operating table. This was followed by assessment of sensory block every 5 minutes with a cold sensation test (using alcohol swab). At the same time points, the level of motor blockade was assessed (according to the Modified Bromage Score(13) with the following categories: 0=No motor block; 1=Inability to raise extended leg; able to move knees and feet; 2=Inability to raise extended leg and move knee; able to move feet and 3=Complete block of motor limb), and the HR, SAP, DAP and the MAP were measured and recorded every 5 minutes after SA and for 4 readings thereafter.
Hypotension was considered if there was 25% decrease below the baseline for MAP and was treated with IV crystalloid (Ringer solution) and incremental IV 5 mg doses of ephedrine. Bradycardia was considered if the heart rate \< 50 beats/min and was treated with IV atropine (0.01mg/kg).
The study end point was 20 minutes after giving the subarachnoid block during which positioning, raising tourniquet or surgical incision was not be allowed.
Data collection:
The hemodynamic parameter values before anesthesia and the values recorded after the blockade were used for the analysis. Analysis was done by comparing the obtained values at each study time point and by comparing the minimal values recorded within the 20 minutes following the blockade as well. When ephedrine or atropine administration was necessary, only the values obtained before this medication was used. Surgical procedure, positioning the patient or application of tourniquet was not allowed during the study period.
Outcomes:
The primary outcome variable in this study was proportions of patients with hypotension defined as a MAP at least 25% less than the basal value at any time during the first 20 min after induction of SA before start of surgical procedure.
The secondary outcomes were:
* The characteristics of the motor blockade.
* The changes in the MAP, SAP, and DAP values in both patient groups, which were recorded before blockade and at 5-minute intervals after the block (till 20 minutes following the blockade).
* The changes in the heart rate (HR).
* The total ephedrine consumption was given to correct hypotension.
* The total atropine consumption was given to correct bradycardia.
3-Analysis of Data:
Depending on Baig et al.,2017(14) who found that the hypotension rate in ondansetron and normal saline groups 7.5% and 28.3% respectively, and assuming the power= 0.80 and α=0.05 and by using PASS 11th release the minimal sample size for an equal size controlled clinical trial was 50 in each group. The investigator recruited 55 in each group for possible attrition(15).
The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 22.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, USA, 2013.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
D group, (n=55)
Dexamethasone phosphate
each patient received 8 mg of intravenous DEX diluted in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline \[NS\]) intravenous infusion (IVI) over 15 min 2 hours preoperatively
C group, (n=55)
Placebo
each patient received 100 mL 0.9% NS IVI over 15 min (Placebo) 2 hours preoperatively
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexamethasone phosphate
each patient received 8 mg of intravenous DEX diluted in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline \[NS\]) intravenous infusion (IVI) over 15 min 2 hours preoperatively
Placebo
each patient received 100 mL 0.9% NS IVI over 15 min (Placebo) 2 hours preoperatively
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II or III
* undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries.
* A written informed consent was obtained from all patients to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* thrombocytopenia,
* allergy to local anesthetic agent)
* and those on steroid or serotonin related medications (e.g. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) were excluded.
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr.Ibrahim Mamdouh Esmat
Assistant Professor, M.D., Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ain- shams University, Egypt.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ibrahim Mamdouh Esmat
Heliopolis, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ashoor TM, Hussien NS, Anis SG, Esmat IM. Dexamethasone blunts postspinal hypotension in geriatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a double blind, placebo-controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 11;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01232-w.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R 46 / 2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.