Spinal or Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Ambulatory Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02282319

Last Updated: 2022-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this double blind randomized study is to determine the effect of dexmedetomidine on onset and duration of the sensory and motor block and on the influence on bladder function after spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine. Our primary hypothesis is that sensory block will significantly be prolonged by dexmedetomidine administered by both the spinal and the intravenous route. The investigators do not expect a significant difference in motor block duration between intravenous or spinal administration. Secondary outcomes are micturition problems, duration of analgesia and the occurrence of side effects such as sedation and hypotension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is designed as a multicenter study and randomization and inclusion of patients will be performed in three hospitals. Each hospital has its own randomisation sequence and coordinating investigator who will be responsible for appointing blinded and unblinded participators in the study.

Patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery will be randomized by sealed envelopes (computer generated sequence) into one of the following three study groups:

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg with spinal dexmedetomidine (5mcg) spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg with intravenous dexmedetomidine ( 0.5 mcg/kg) spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg alone (control group)

All patients will receive the same amount of spinal solution, containing chloroprocaine 1% (4 ml) with dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml, 1 mcg/ml) or NaCl ( sodiumchloride) 0,9% (0.5 ml ) ( and 50 ml intravenous Nacl 0.9, containing dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) or not depending on the study group. All solutions are prepared by an independent anesthesiologist and labelled as Intravenous study medication and spinal study medication. Spinal anesthesia and data registration will be done by a blinded anesthesist and/or study nurse on a data sheet designed for the study.

Spinal anesthesia is performed in the lateral decubitus at L3-L4 vertebral interspace and standard monitoring for this procedure is applied. Insufficient analgesia will be treated with sufentanil increments. Hypotension and bradycardia will be treated with ephedrine and atropine. Patients will be discharged when the block is regressed, there is no sedation or nausea and nrs scores of pain are below 4. Patients will be contacted by telephone after one week to evaluate any postoperative complaints.Micturition will receive a score based on bladder volumes measured by bladder scanning and subjective complaints . This score system was used in two of our former studies (1,2)

To calculate the power of this study, we used the mean L2 regression of a previous study after spinal chloroprocaine with its standard deviation (SD 20 min, mean 90 min) and compared it to a mean increase with 30 %. We calculated that we should include 7 patients in each group to obtain a power of 80%.

To be sure to detect a possible difference in discharge time as well, we calculated a sample size of 48 patients for each group to detect a 30-minute difference.

Statistical analysis will be done with ANOVA analysis , A kruskal-Wallis of Mann Whitney test depending on the distribution of the population and if the values are parametric or not. This will be done by spss.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgery Ambulatory

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A chloro

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg

Intervention Type OTHER

spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine 40 mg

B chloro+ spin dexdor

Spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg

Intervention Type OTHER

spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine 40 mg

C chloro + IV dexdor

Spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg

Intervention Type OTHER

spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine 40 mg

IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

spinal dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg

Administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg

Intervention Type DRUG

spinal chloroprocaine 40 mg

spinal anesthesia with chloroprocaine 40 mg

Intervention Type OTHER

IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

dexdor ampres dexdor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class 1 \& 2,
* undergoing day-case knee arthroscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* micturition problems,
* neurological history or
* previous lower abdominal surgery with an abnormal micturition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr M. B. Breebaart

dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

margaretha breebaart, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Antwerp

Marcel Vercauteren, MD, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Antwerp

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Antwerp

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint Augustinus

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Breebaart MB, Vercauteren MP, Hoffmann VL, Adriaensen HA. Urinary bladder scanning after day-case arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia: comparison between lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Mar;90(3):309-13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg078.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12594142 (View on PubMed)

Breebaart MB, Teune A, Sermeus LA, Vercauteren MP. Intrathecal chloroprocaine vs. lidocaine in day-case surgery: recovery, discharge and effect of pre-hydration on micturition. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Feb;58(2):206-13. doi: 10.1111/aas.12247.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24563922 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/35/334

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Dexmedetomidine in Spine Surgery
NCT01850017 COMPLETED PHASE4