Effects of Combined Treatment by Botulinum Toxin and Lokomat® on Walking Ability in Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03659266

Last Updated: 2024-06-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-07

Study Completion Date

2021-07-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

75% patients in the chronic phase of a stroke keep walking disabilities. Focal spasticity in the paretic lower limb frequently causes these walking disabilities, and the gold standard treatment is intramuscular injection of Botulinum toxin A in the spastic muscles.

To potentiate the effects of toxin, walking rehabilitation is usually prescribed in the weeks following injection, but the protocols vary and few have been evaluated in the medical literature.

In particular, the effect on walking ability of combined treatment by botulinum toxin A and robot-assisted gait training has never been evaluated.

Tested hypothesis: Robot-assisted gait training by Lokomat® motorized exoskeleton potentiates botulinum toxin's effects better than conventional walking therapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on walking ability of the association of focal spasticity treatment by Botulinum toxin and Lokomat-assisted walking rehabilitation in patients suffering from spastic hemiparesia after stroke in the chronic phase.

Outcome:

-Primary: distance walked (meters) in the six-minute walk test (SMWT)

Prospective, randomized, controlled, opened, monocentric study with a crossover design.

Recruitment of patients over 18 years of age, in the chronic phase of stroke, who have already been treated by Botulinum toxin injection for focal spasticity in our PMR ward.

Assessment at Day one (D0), Week four (W4) and Week eight (W8).

Following a preliminary study which had the six-minute walk test as a secondary outcome, the expected results are a significant improvement of the distance walked in the SMWT after robotic rehabilitation, and a lack of significant improvement following conventional therapy.

The study should serve to further harmonize and optimize rehabilitation protocols after toxin injections, and to justify the use of robotic rehabilitation for patients in the chronic phase of stroke.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction :

75% patients in the chronic phase of a stroke (\>6 months) keep walking disabilities. Focal spasticity in the paretic lower limb frequently causes these walking disabilities, and the gold standard treatment is intramuscular injection of Botulinum toxin A in the spastic muscles.

To potentiate the effects of toxin, walking rehabilitation is usually prescribed in the weeks following injection, but the protocols vary and few have been evaluated in the medical literature.

In particular, the effect on walking ability of combined treatment by botulinum toxin A and robot-assisted gait training has never been evaluated.

Materials and Methods:

Tested hypothesis:

Robot-assisted gait training by Lokomat® motorized exoskeleton potentiates botulinum toxin's effects better than conventional walking therapy.

Aims:

* Primary: to evaluate the effects on walking ability of the association of focal spasticity treatment by Botulinum toxin and Lokomat-assisted walking rehabilitation in patients suffering from spastic hemiparesia after stroke in the chronic phase.
* Secondary: to determine the optimal time between the toxin injection and the start of robotic rehabilitation; to evaluate the effects of the combined treatment on the balance and spasticity.

Outcome:

* Primary: distance walked (meters) in the six-minute walk test (SMWT)
* Secondary: walking speed (meters/seconds), balance (Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale), spasticity (score on the Modified Ashworth Scale and joint range of motion)

Study Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled, opened, monocentric study with a crossover design.

Recruitment of patients over 18 years of age, in the chronic phase of stroke, who have already been treated by Botulinum toxin injection for focal spasticity in our PMR ward.

Assessment at Day one (D0), Week four (W4) and Week eight (W8).

1. st Group D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae, according to pre-established modalities (no influence of the experimental protocol on this stage) W2-W4: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)
2. nd Group: D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae W2-W4: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)

Expected results:

Following a preliminary study which had the six-minute walk test as a secondary outcome, the expected results are a significant improvement of the distance walked in the SMWT after robotic rehabilitation, and a lack of significant improvement following conventional therapy.

The study should serve to further harmonize and optimize rehabilitation protocols after toxin injections, and to justify the use of robotic rehabilitation for patients in the chronic phase of stroke.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae, according to pre-established modalities (no influence of the experimental protocol on this stage) W2-W4: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat®

Intervention Type OTHER

Lokomat sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of effective work of the march and 15 minutes of setting up.

Conventional walking rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

5 physiotherapy sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of walking and 15 minutes of stretching

group 2

D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae W2-W4: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat®

Intervention Type OTHER

Lokomat sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of effective work of the march and 15 minutes of setting up.

Conventional walking rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

5 physiotherapy sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of walking and 15 minutes of stretching

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat®

Lokomat sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of effective work of the march and 15 minutes of setting up.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional walking rehabilitation

5 physiotherapy sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of walking and 15 minutes of stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 80 years
* Left or right spastic hemiparesia after a single unilateral hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, in chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)
* Functional hindrance in walking
* Spasticity of paretic triceps surae allowing for focal treatment by Botulinum toxin injection

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to walk with or without technical aids \>5min
* Cognitive disorders disallowing informed consent
* Spasticity equal or superior to 4 on the triceps surae (On the Modified Ashworth Scale)
* Physical exercise not allowed: non stable cardiovascular or pulmonary disease in particular
* Lokomat® use not allowed: cutaneous lesions that could come in contact with the straps, non consolidated recent fracture (\<3months), severe disability in controlling trunk balance disallowing correct posture in Lokomat®, intra-abdominal cranial flap, weight\>135kg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

APHM

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille

Marseille, PACA, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-69

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gait Training for Persons With Stroke
NCT00612300 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1