Effects of Combined Treatment by Botulinum Toxin and Lokomat® on Walking Ability in Chronic Stroke
NCT ID: NCT03659266
Last Updated: 2024-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-07
2021-07-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To potentiate the effects of toxin, walking rehabilitation is usually prescribed in the weeks following injection, but the protocols vary and few have been evaluated in the medical literature.
In particular, the effect on walking ability of combined treatment by botulinum toxin A and robot-assisted gait training has never been evaluated.
Tested hypothesis: Robot-assisted gait training by Lokomat® motorized exoskeleton potentiates botulinum toxin's effects better than conventional walking therapy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on walking ability of the association of focal spasticity treatment by Botulinum toxin and Lokomat-assisted walking rehabilitation in patients suffering from spastic hemiparesia after stroke in the chronic phase.
Outcome:
-Primary: distance walked (meters) in the six-minute walk test (SMWT)
Prospective, randomized, controlled, opened, monocentric study with a crossover design.
Recruitment of patients over 18 years of age, in the chronic phase of stroke, who have already been treated by Botulinum toxin injection for focal spasticity in our PMR ward.
Assessment at Day one (D0), Week four (W4) and Week eight (W8).
Following a preliminary study which had the six-minute walk test as a secondary outcome, the expected results are a significant improvement of the distance walked in the SMWT after robotic rehabilitation, and a lack of significant improvement following conventional therapy.
The study should serve to further harmonize and optimize rehabilitation protocols after toxin injections, and to justify the use of robotic rehabilitation for patients in the chronic phase of stroke.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Early-Subacute Stroke
NCT06233734
Robot-Assisted Gait Therapy in the Subacute Phase of First Ischemic Stroke
NCT04910217
Motor Rehabilitation and Physical, Mental and Cognitive Health in Patients With Stroke
NCT06840366
Walking Therapy In Hemiparetic Stroke Patients Using Robotic-Assisted Treadmill Training
NCT00075283
Effect of Repeated Botulinum Toxin Injection on Gait Pattern in Stroke Patients
NCT02699775
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
75% patients in the chronic phase of a stroke (\>6 months) keep walking disabilities. Focal spasticity in the paretic lower limb frequently causes these walking disabilities, and the gold standard treatment is intramuscular injection of Botulinum toxin A in the spastic muscles.
To potentiate the effects of toxin, walking rehabilitation is usually prescribed in the weeks following injection, but the protocols vary and few have been evaluated in the medical literature.
In particular, the effect on walking ability of combined treatment by botulinum toxin A and robot-assisted gait training has never been evaluated.
Materials and Methods:
Tested hypothesis:
Robot-assisted gait training by Lokomat® motorized exoskeleton potentiates botulinum toxin's effects better than conventional walking therapy.
Aims:
* Primary: to evaluate the effects on walking ability of the association of focal spasticity treatment by Botulinum toxin and Lokomat-assisted walking rehabilitation in patients suffering from spastic hemiparesia after stroke in the chronic phase.
* Secondary: to determine the optimal time between the toxin injection and the start of robotic rehabilitation; to evaluate the effects of the combined treatment on the balance and spasticity.
Outcome:
* Primary: distance walked (meters) in the six-minute walk test (SMWT)
* Secondary: walking speed (meters/seconds), balance (Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale), spasticity (score on the Modified Ashworth Scale and joint range of motion)
Study Design:
Prospective, randomized, controlled, opened, monocentric study with a crossover design.
Recruitment of patients over 18 years of age, in the chronic phase of stroke, who have already been treated by Botulinum toxin injection for focal spasticity in our PMR ward.
Assessment at Day one (D0), Week four (W4) and Week eight (W8).
1. st Group D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae, according to pre-established modalities (no influence of the experimental protocol on this stage) W2-W4: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)
2. nd Group: D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae W2-W4: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)
Expected results:
Following a preliminary study which had the six-minute walk test as a secondary outcome, the expected results are a significant improvement of the distance walked in the SMWT after robotic rehabilitation, and a lack of significant improvement following conventional therapy.
The study should serve to further harmonize and optimize rehabilitation protocols after toxin injections, and to justify the use of robotic rehabilitation for patients in the chronic phase of stroke.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae, according to pre-established modalities (no influence of the experimental protocol on this stage) W2-W4: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)
Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat®
Lokomat sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of effective work of the march and 15 minutes of setting up.
Conventional walking rehabilitation
5 physiotherapy sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of walking and 15 minutes of stretching
group 2
D0: Injection of Botulinum toxin A in triceps surae W2-W4: Conventional walking rehabilitation in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization) W4-W6: Return to home, "wash-out"period W6-W8: Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat® in the functional rehabilitation department (conventional hospitalization)
Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat®
Lokomat sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of effective work of the march and 15 minutes of setting up.
Conventional walking rehabilitation
5 physiotherapy sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of walking and 15 minutes of stretching
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic walking rehabilitation by Lokomat®
Lokomat sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of effective work of the march and 15 minutes of setting up.
Conventional walking rehabilitation
5 physiotherapy sessions / week for 2 weeks. Each session lasts 45 minutes including 30 minutes of walking and 15 minutes of stretching
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Left or right spastic hemiparesia after a single unilateral hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, in chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)
* Functional hindrance in walking
* Spasticity of paretic triceps surae allowing for focal treatment by Botulinum toxin injection
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive disorders disallowing informed consent
* Spasticity equal or superior to 4 on the triceps surae (On the Modified Ashworth Scale)
* Physical exercise not allowed: non stable cardiovascular or pulmonary disease in particular
* Lokomat® use not allowed: cutaneous lesions that could come in contact with the straps, non consolidated recent fracture (\<3months), severe disability in controlling trunk balance disallowing correct posture in Lokomat®, intra-abdominal cranial flap, weight\>135kg
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
EMILIE GARRIDO PRADALIE
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
APHM
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assistance Publique Des Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, PACA, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-69
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.