Comparative Study of LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation.
NCT ID: NCT06970314
Last Updated: 2025-05-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The effect of both treatments for gait rehabilitation in adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life in the neurorehabilitation clinic will be studied.
adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life at the Lescer neurorehabilitation clinic Lescer, Madrid (Spain).Participants will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Study of LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation.
NCT07230470
Effectiveness of Multiple Robotic Gait-Devices for Improving Walking Ability in Subacute Stroke Patients
NCT05811494
Robotic Assessment of Lower Extremity Motor Learning
NCT01361867
Evaluation of a Training in the Walking With Exosquelette
NCT02085954
Walking Therapy In Hemiparetic Stroke Patients Using Robotic-Assisted Treadmill Training
NCT00075283
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lokomat
-To compare the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation work in adult stroke patients using the Lokomat® tool vs.
stroke with the Lokomat® tool.
Lokomat
Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke
C-Mill
-To compare the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation work in adult stroke patients using the Lokomat® tool vs.
stroke with the C-Mill® tool.
C-Mill
Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lokomat
Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke
C-Mill
Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are cognitively capable and who sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
conditions.
* Diagnosis of concomitant neurological diseases and craniocerebral trauma. cranioencephalic trauma.
* Other diseases that interfere with the gait process (e.g. disabling arthritis or arthrosis, other neurological diseases, other neurological diseases).
disabling arthritis or osteoarthritis, other concomitant neurological diseases, etc.).
\- Contraindications of the robotic tools themselves.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Católica de Ávila
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
JORGE VELAZQUEZ SAORNIL
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
Salamanca, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lefeber N, De Keersmaecker E, Henderix S, Michielsen M, Kerckhofs E, Swinnen E. Physiological Responses and Perceived Exertion During Robot-Assisted and Body Weight-Supported Gait After Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018 Dec;32(12):1043-1054. doi: 10.1177/1545968318810810. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
Wallard L, Dietrich G, Kerlirzin Y, Bredin J. Effects of robotic gait rehabilitation on biomechanical parameters in the chronic hemiplegic patients. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep;45(3):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
Park J, Kim TH. The effects of balance and gait function on quality of life of stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(1):37-41. doi: 10.3233/NRE-182467.
Callaly EL, Ni Chroinin D, Hannon N, Sheehan O, Marnane M, Merwick A, Kelly LA, Horgan G, Williams E, Harris D, Williams D, Moore A, Dolan E, Murphy S, Kelly PJ, Duggan J, Kyne L. Falls and fractures 2 years after acute stroke: the North Dublin Population Stroke Study. Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):882-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv093. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06/05/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.