FX vs. ECG Guidance for PICC Insertion

NCT ID: NCT03652727

Last Updated: 2020-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-04

Study Completion Date

2019-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare two techniques of placing a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC). The first technique, uses ECG based electromagnetic guidance (ECG-EM). The second (reference technique), is guided by X-ray (fluoroscopy).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The method of placement under fluoroscopic control (FX) is considered as the reference technique. This is often criticized for disadvantages such as costs, logistical problems and relative ionizing radiation. Despite this, it is still advised by 75% of PICC providers.

Appeared about ten years ago, a per procedural guiding technique with intracavitary ECG tracking (ECG-EM) presents a better technical success (precision and specificity) than the blind technique, but there is still a lack in comparing this technique to the FX technique.

This prospective randomized controlled study is designed to compare the PICC insertion using ECG-EM guidance to fluoroscopic (FX) guidance in order to define whether a replacement of the FX technique by ECG-EM is appropriate in terms of the final catheter tip position of the PICC as well as length of the outgoing catheter at the entry point.

All included patients gave their written consent and the study is approved by EC.

Participation is open to all adults referred to the radiology department of the CHUV for insertion of a PICC (monocentric).

Recruited patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two arms (FX or ECG-EM).

For both procedures patient position and preparation (MSB, maximal sterile barrier) are standardized and are similar.

FX method consists on a puncture of an arm vein, under the ultrasound control and local anesthesia. Through the point of puncture, a long wire is then introduced and directed to the level of the target zone located in the superior vena cava under fluoroscopy control. The length of the guide inside the vessel is then measured to adjust the length of the PICC necessary for its optimal positioning.

For ECG-EM insertion technique, the vein puncture is done in similar conditions to the FX method. The length of the PICC is estimated prior to its insertion using morphological landmarks. The placement of the PICC is done using SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) (CE marked device; C. R. Bard, Inc.).

At the end of procedure, a chest x-ray is performed to assess the PICC position. Possible per-procedural complications are documented.

After intervention, the patient is transferred back to the ward or sent home in stable conditions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Long Term Antibiotics Chemotherapy Total Parenteral Nutrition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ECG-EM Guidance

PICC insertion using electrocardiographic and electromagnetic guidance \[Site\~Rite® 8 Ultrasound System with integrated SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS)\]

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ECG-EM Guidance

Intervention Type DEVICE

ECG-EM method consists on a puncture of an arm vein, under the ultrasound control and local anesthesia. The length of the PICC is estimated prior to its insertion using morphological landmarks. The placement of the PICC is done using SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) \[CE marked device, C. R. Bard, Inc.\].

At the end of procedure, a chest x-ray is performed to assess the PICC position

FX Guidance

PICC insertion using fluoroscopic guidance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

FX Guidance

Intervention Type DEVICE

FX method consists on a puncture of an arm vein, under the ultrasound control and local anesthesia. Through the point of puncture, a long wire is then introduced and directed to the level of the target zone located in the superior vena cava under fluoroscopy control. The length of the guide inside the vessel is then measured to adjust the length of the PICC necessary for its optimal positioning.

At the end of procedure, a chest x-ray is performed to assess the PICC position

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ECG-EM Guidance

ECG-EM method consists on a puncture of an arm vein, under the ultrasound control and local anesthesia. The length of the PICC is estimated prior to its insertion using morphological landmarks. The placement of the PICC is done using SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System (TCS) \[CE marked device, C. R. Bard, Inc.\].

At the end of procedure, a chest x-ray is performed to assess the PICC position

Intervention Type DEVICE

FX Guidance

FX method consists on a puncture of an arm vein, under the ultrasound control and local anesthesia. Through the point of puncture, a long wire is then introduced and directed to the level of the target zone located in the superior vena cava under fluoroscopy control. The length of the guide inside the vessel is then measured to adjust the length of the PICC necessary for its optimal positioning.

At the end of procedure, a chest x-ray is performed to assess the PICC position

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed Consent as documented by signature (Informed Consent Form)
* Adult \> 18 years
* Referred to the interventional radiology department for PICC insertion

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Known or suspected non-compliance
* Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
* Previous enrolment into the current study,
* Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons,
* Impairment of the heart rhythm changing the presentation of the P wave (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, severe tachycardia, pacemaker driven rhythm)
* Enrolled in conflicting research study
* Weight\> 150 kg, technical limit for the fluoroscopy table
* Impossibility of obtaining informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Salah D. Qanadli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salah D. Qanadli

Prof. MD PhD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Salah Dine Qanadli, Prof. MD PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UNIL-CHUV

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHUV

Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gullo G, Colin A, Frossard P, Jouannic AM, Knebel JF, Qanadli SD. Appropriateness of Replacing Fluoroscopic Guidance With ECG-Electromagnetic Guidance for PICC Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Apr;216(4):981-988. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23345. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33594912 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-00907

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.