Comparative Study Evaluating Stability of Fracture Segments After Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fracture With 3d Strut Plate With or Without IMMF.

NCT ID: NCT03640039

Last Updated: 2018-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-11

Study Completion Date

2020-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

comparative study evaluating stability of fracture segments in mandibular angle fracture with 3d strut plate with or with out post operative IMMF.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two group of patient with mandibular angle fracture indicated for open reduction and internal fixation ,first group will be fixed with 3d stut plate with post operative IMMF. Second group will be fixed with 3d strut plate with out post operative IMMF.

Eligble patients will be randomised in equal proportions between study group (3d strut plate with out post operative IMMF) and control group (3d strut plate with post operative IMMF).

A- 3D strut plate without post operative IMMF:

* Pre operative computed tomography will be done for patient.
* Intra operative :all cases will under go general anathesia.
* Exposure of the fracture segments using vestubular incision.
* Inter-maxillary fixation will be done.
* The fracture segment will be reduced in normal anatomic postion guided with occlusion.
* The fracture segment will be fixed in postion using 3d srut plate.
* Closure of surgical incision.
* Post operative computed tomograghy will be done for the patient.
* Patient will be dismissed from operation room without IMMF.

B- 3D strut with post operative IMMF:

* Pre operative computed tomography will be done for patient.
* Intra operative :all cases will under go general anathesia.
* Exposure of the fracture segments using vestubular incision.
* Inter-maxillary fixation will be done.
* The fracture segment will be reduced in normal anatomic postion guided with occlusion.
* The fracture segment will be fixed in postion using 3d srut plate.
* Closure of surgical incision.
* Post operative computed tomograghy will be done for the patient.
* Patient will be dismissed from operation room with IMMF for 15 days.

Follow up for both groups :

Clinical examination will be done at first week post operative and patients will be examined every week for one month. Last follow up visit will be after three months post operative.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mandible Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* A Radomized clinical trial.
* Parallel group study.
* A trial will be carried out in hospital of oral and maxillofacial surgery department - faculty of dentistry cairo university.
* Equal randomization: participants with equal probabilities for intervention.
* Positive controlled: both groups receiving treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

study group: 3d strut plate fixation without post op IMMF.

Open reduction and internal fixation with 3d strut plate without post operative IMMF.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3d strut plate.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Under general anathesia fracture will be exposed and fixed with 3d srut plate.Wound closed in standered fashion. patient will be released from operating room with out IMMF.

control group: 3d srut plate fixation with post op IMMF.

Open reduction and internal fixation with 3d strut plate with post operative IMMF for 15 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

3d strut plate.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Under general anathesia fracture will be exposed and fixed with 3d srut plate.Wound closed in standered fashion. patient will be released from operating room with out IMMF.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3d strut plate.

Under general anathesia fracture will be exposed and fixed with 3d srut plate.Wound closed in standered fashion. patient will be released from operating room with out IMMF.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with mandibular angle fracture with or witout other fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation in the mandible.
* Patient over 15 years old age and both sexes were included in this study.
* Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
* Patients with good general condition allowing major surgical procedure under general anesthesia.
* Patients with physical and psychological tolerance.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with comminuted fractures as it is not indicated for compression osteosynthesis like3d strut plate .
* Patients with high risk systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. As uncontrolled diabetes mellitus has a negative impact on normal bone healing.
* Patients with old and/or mal-union fractures. As they will affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Khater tarek

Assistant lecturer.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hesham A Hakam, Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed T khater, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+201003854552

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kellman RM. Repair of mandibular fractures via compression plating and more traditional techniques: a comparison of results. Laryngoscope. 1984 Dec;94(12 Pt 1):1560-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6503575 (View on PubMed)

Saman M, Kadakia S, Ducic Y. Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation after open reduction of mandible fractures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):410-3. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.543.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25232835 (View on PubMed)

Guimond C, Johnson JV, Marchena JM. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;63(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.03.018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15690289 (View on PubMed)

Farmand M. [Experiences with the 3-D miniplate osteosynthesis in mandibular fractures]. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:85-7. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8755408 (View on PubMed)

Vineeth K, Lalitha RM, Prasad K, Ranganath K, Shwetha V, Singh J. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22809633 (View on PubMed)

Farmand M, Dupoirieux L. [The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1992;93(6):353-7. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1475603 (View on PubMed)

Sadhwani BS, Anchlia S. Conventional 2.0 mm miniplates versus 3-D plates in mandibular fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;3(2):154-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.119231.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24205475 (View on PubMed)

Jain MK, Manjunath KS, Bhagwan BK, Shah DK. Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1568-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.083. Epub 2010 Apr 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20417012 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2972018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Plating Versus Nailing in Pediatric BB Forearm Fractures
NCT06542471 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA