Fracture Gap After Herbert Screw Insertion by 3d Stents Vs Titanium Plate(Minimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture)
NCT ID: NCT03692260
Last Updated: 2018-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-10-25
2019-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Herbert Screw vs Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fracture Treatment
NCT04719325
Accuracy of Computer Guided Screw Holes Locating Guide and Patient Specific Champy Plate vs Conventional Champy Plate Osteosynthesis in Management of Mandibular Angle Fracture: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06838377
Computer Guided Lag Screw Fixation Versus Conventional Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fractures
NCT03530891
Comparative Study Evaluating Stability of Fracture Segments After Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fracture With 3d Strut Plate With or Without IMMF.
NCT03640039
V Shaped Plate Vs Champy Technique in Mandibular Angle Fractures
NCT06005467
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Diagnosis
* for group I and II According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients are selected after a comprehensive clinical and radiographic examination and understanding of participant s chief complains.
* Inspection for the soft tissue laceration, edema, ecchymosis, hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, gingival lacerations, mandible contour deformity, facial asymmetry and the other facial bones bilateral palpation starting from the condylar region descending towards the posterior border of the mandible to look for any tenderness, step deformities or crepitus. Examination of the integrity of the neurosensory and motor function of the injured area.
* Checking the amount of occlusal discrepancy with complete and comprehensive examination of the dentition.
* Mandibular movements will also be checked with emphasis on maximal Interincisal opening and midline shift in opening and closing positions.
2. Surgical planning Group I :participants will be treated using Herbert headless cannulated screw(Zimmer® Herbert™ ,united states of America )Cannulated Bone Screw) using 3d template GroupII :patients are treated using titanium plates (4 or 6 holes according to each case) orthomed ,6th of October,Egypt)
3. Intra-operative procedures:
-All of the participants will be treated under general anaesthesia using nasal intubation
* The occlusion was secured with temporary IMF and the fracture line was exposed and manually reduced.
* Infiltration Local anesthesia with vasoconstrictor will be injected intraorally at the incision site for hemostatic purposes and pain control.
* Scrubbing and draping of the patient will be carried out in a standard fashion.
* An intraoral incision to expose the fracture line. Dissection and reflection to reach the bone For the intervention group planning using the ct software to produce a guiding template of the mandible in the normal position for the insertion of the Herbert screw.
Reduction of the fracture -Fixation of the fractured segments through Herbert screw using the 3D template fabricated by Plastycad 3diemme Italy(group I), or by using titanium the plate (groupII)
-Double checking and verification of the occlusion before wound closure.
-Wounds are debrided and sutured.
4. Postoperative
\- Cold application at the site of surgery in the form of ice packs 10 minutes every hour in the first 6 hours.
-Broad spectrum antibiotic therapy in the form of Unasyn 1500 mg vials was given as an IV shot to the patient every 12 hours for 5 days to reduce the risk of infection. (Unasyn®: manufactured by Pfizer, Egypt S.A.E Cairo, A.R.E)
* Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug will be administered in the form of Voltaren 75mg ampoule 3 times daily for 3 days to relief the pain. (Voltaren®: NOVARTIS PHARMA S.A.E. Cairo, under license from: Novartis Pharma AG, Basle, Switzerland.)
5. Follow up \& Evaluation
Clinical follow up parameters:
For group I and group II - Dehiscence of the soft tissue and hardware exposure. - Pain over visual analogue scale over first 72 hours.
* Maximum incisal opening (MIO)
* Stability of the fractured segments.
Radiographic follow up parameters:
\- Bone union/nonunion and malunion (OPG).
* Bone to bone contact via mandible form \& border contour (OPG) (3diagnosys 3diemme Italy version 4.2 Any participant that can cause an adverse effect to the intervention/control group will be excluded
* the patients will receive their panoramic x-ray at the accurate indicated intervals.
The the MIO will be tested for all patients under the same chair postion using the same caliper, the visual analogue scale to measure the pain will be explained to the patient to prevent any misunderstanding and for the sensory function the patients will be asked to close their eyes before we start to prevent any misleading data as he will not be able to see area we are checking. Those Strategies will be used to improve adherence to intervention protocols.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention group
3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate
3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate
benefit of 3d template in fracture gap
control group
titanium plate
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3D stent in Herbert screw insertion vs titanium plate
benefit of 3d template in fracture gap
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with minimally displaced angular fracture
* Patients free from any systemic disease that delay bone healing
* Patients free from any metabolic bone disease delaying the healing
* Patients who approved to be included in the trial and signed the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who refused to be included in the trial
20 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nevine Alaa Eldine
assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hussein h Abd elrahman, a professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Nevine AE Fathy mohammed elfath omar, a lecturer
Role: CONTACT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2018-09-29
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.