Patient Satisfaction Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Patient Specificosteosynthesis Fixation Versus MMFmandibular Prognanthism
NCT ID: NCT03855072
Last Updated: 2019-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-30
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer Guided Lag Screw Fixation Versus Conventional Lag Screw Fixation in Anterior Mandibular Fractures
NCT03530891
Comparative Study Evaluating Stability of Fracture Segments After Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fracture With 3d Strut Plate With or Without IMMF.
NCT03640039
Accuracy of Computer Guided Screw Holes Locating Guide and Patient Specific Champy Plate vs Conventional Champy Plate Osteosynthesis in Management of Mandibular Angle Fracture: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06838377
Fixation of Fractures at Anterior Transition Zone Using Three Different Miniplates Configurations
NCT07058597
V Shaped Plate Vs Champy Technique in Mandibular Angle Fractures
NCT06005467
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Interventions:
General operative procedures
Eligible patients will be randomized in equal proportions between the study group (customized plate fixation of VRO) and the control group (maxillomandibular fixation of VRO).
Patients of Both groups will be subjected to:
1. Case history including personal data, medical, surgical history and family history
2. Clinical examination .
3. Radiographic examination in the form of cephalometric radiogragh .
4. Preoperative laboratory tests (complete blood cell count, Hemoglobin count, coagulation profile, liver function, kidney function and blood glucose level).
5. Preoperative anesthesia assessment for fitness for general anesthesia.
vertical ramus osteotmy fixed with customized plate
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* Incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region
* Amucoperiosteal flap was reflected to expose the lateral mandibular ramus to the posterior border and the sigmoid notch
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible. The osteotomy is placed 5 mm anterior to the posterior border of the mandible to avoid injury to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle
* 3D virtual planning and 3D mandible model represented fom CBCT in MIMICS
* The setback will be simulated according to pre-planned measure
* The customized bone plate is positioned to fix the proximal and distal segment together
vertical ramus osteotomy fixed with MMF.
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region .
* Amucoperiosteal flap was reflected to expose the lateral mandibular ramus to the posterior border and the sigmoid notch
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible. The osteotomy is placed 5 mm anterior to the posterior border of the mandible to avoid injury to inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle.
* Patient is placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using a prefabricated occlusal splint to assure accuracy of the mandibular position.
follow up clinical and radiographic evaluation will be performed at the first week postoperative then the patients will recalled for radiograghic evaluation at 2weeks and 2 months .finall follow up visit will be at 6 months postoperative
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* A Trial will be carried out in Hospital of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery departement- faculty of Dentistry , Cairo University
* Equal randomization : participant with equal probabilities for intervention
* Parallel group study : Each group of patients recieves a single treatment simultaneously
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Customized plate fixation
Customized Plate fixation of Vertical Ramus Osteotomy after Mandibular Setback
\- intervention:
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* Incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible.
* 3D virtual planning and 3D mandible model represented fom CBCT in MIMICS
* The customized fixation plate is positioned to fix the proximal and distal segment together
customized fixation plate
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* Incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region
* Amucoperiosteal flap was reflected to expose the lateral mandibular ramus to the posterior border and the sigmoid notch
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible.
* 3D virtual planning and 3D mandible model represented fom CBCT in MIMICS
* The customized fixation plate is positioned to fix the proximal and distal segment together after setback
maxillomandibular fixation
Mandibular Setback by Vertical Ramus Ostotmy fixed with Maxillomandibular fixation
\- intervention:
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia
* incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region .
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible.
* Patient is placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using a prefabricated occlusal splint
maxillomandibular fixation
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region .
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible.
* Patient is placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using a prefabricated occlusal splint to assure accuracy of the mandibular position.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
customized fixation plate
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* Incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region
* Amucoperiosteal flap was reflected to expose the lateral mandibular ramus to the posterior border and the sigmoid notch
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible.
* 3D virtual planning and 3D mandible model represented fom CBCT in MIMICS
* The customized fixation plate is positioned to fix the proximal and distal segment together after setback
maxillomandibular fixation
* All cases will undergo one surgery under general anesthesia.
* incision was made medial to external oblique ridge from the asendindg ramus to second molar region .
* The intraoral vertical osteotomy is accomplished by using an oscillating saw to make the cut from the sigmoid notch through the inferior border of the mandible.
* Patient is placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using a prefabricated occlusal splint to assure accuracy of the mandibular position.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with mandibular prognanthism indicated for mandibular setback.
* All ages \>18 years
* Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
* Patients with good general condition allowing surgical procedure under general anesthesia.
* Patients with physical and psychological tolerance
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous orthognathic surgery
* Degenerative disease of temporomandibular joint
* Craniofacial syndrome such as cleft lip or palate
* Follow up period will be less than 6 months
18 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marwa Sayed Abbass Ali
associate lecturer
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Goal NO 5 , OMFS IV A3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.