The Cortical Motor Effects of PNS and AO on Motor Training in Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT03625804

Last Updated: 2018-08-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-23

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to investigate if peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) paired with action observation (AO) would augment motor training in promoting corticomotor excitability for the paretic hand in people with stroke. Twenty subjects in chronic stage of stroke were exposed to 3 different interventions involving one-hour PNS or sham PNS paired with 30 minutes of AO or sham AO, all followed by 30 minutes of finger abduction training in 3 separate sessions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigator's previous study (Liu \& Au-Yeung, 2017; PMID: 28383292) has demonstrated that 1-hour peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) applied to the radial and ulnar nerves of the paretic UL of people with chronic stroke can increase transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked excitability of corticomotor pathways in both hemispheres projected to the contralateral first dorsal interosseous (FDI) hand muscle, and also improve dexterity in the paretic hand. This bi-hemispheric effect of PNS suggests that certain additional therapies such as action observation (AO) and motor training should be incorporated to strengthen the plastic corticomotor adaptation specifically for paretic UL control. The hypothesis of this study is that PNS paired with AO would augment task training of the paretic hand by increasing the corticomotor excitability in the lesioned hemisphere for the trained hand muscle in people with stroke, with associated dexterity function improvement. Twenty subjects were recruited by convenience in the community. They then attended an assessment session to evaluate the baseline sensorimotor status of their paretic upper limb. After the clinical tests,the subjects were introduced the assessment procedure for measuring corticomotor excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). After 1-week intermission, the subjects returned for 3 intervention sessions with different protocols including (1)PNS+AO+Training; (2)PNS+AOsham+Training; and (3)PNSsham+AOsham+Training. These 3 intervention sessions were arranged in random sequence for subjects. For "PNS+AO+Training" session, electrical stimulation was applied to the radial and ulnar nerve (PNS) of the paretic arm for 60 minutes. During the last 30 minutes of PNS, action observation (AO) was introduced in which subjects were required to watch a series of video clips. After one hour's PNS+AO, the subjects then proceeded to a 30-minute period of motor training of paretic hand. During "PNS+AOsham+Training" session, PNS was given as described before. During the last 30 minutes of the PNS, subjects were shown different photos illustrating a letter, a number or a hand as AOsham. The protocol of motor training was the same as described before. In the session of "PNSsham+AOsham+Training", The 1-hour PNSsham was conducted with the electrical stimulation unit turned on but without current output. The protocols for AOsham and motor training were the same as those described before.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Single-blind randomized cross-over study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PNS+AO+Training

adopted "PNS+AO+Training" as the intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PNS+AO+Training

Intervention Type GENETIC

Electrical stimulation was applied to the radial and ulnar nerve (PNS) of the paretic arm for 60 minutes. During the last 30 minutes of PNS, action observation (AO) was introduced in which subjects were required to watch a series of video clips. After one hour's PNS+AO, the subjects then proceeded to a 30-minute period of motor training of paretic hand.

PNS+AOsham+Training

adopted "PNS+AOsham+Training" as the intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PNS+AOsham+Training

Intervention Type GENETIC

PNS was given as described before. During the last 30 minutes of the PNS, subjects were shown different photos illustrating a letter, a number or a hand as AOsham. The protocol of motor training was the same as described before.

PNSsham+AOsham+Training

adopted "PNSsham+AOsham+Training" as the intervention

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

PNSsham+AOsham+Training

Intervention Type GENETIC

The 1-hour PNSsham was conducted with the electrical stimulation unit turned on but without current output. The protocols for AOsham and motor training were the same as those described before.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PNS+AO+Training

Electrical stimulation was applied to the radial and ulnar nerve (PNS) of the paretic arm for 60 minutes. During the last 30 minutes of PNS, action observation (AO) was introduced in which subjects were required to watch a series of video clips. After one hour's PNS+AO, the subjects then proceeded to a 30-minute period of motor training of paretic hand.

Intervention Type GENETIC

PNS+AOsham+Training

PNS was given as described before. During the last 30 minutes of the PNS, subjects were shown different photos illustrating a letter, a number or a hand as AOsham. The protocol of motor training was the same as described before.

Intervention Type GENETIC

PNSsham+AOsham+Training

The 1-hour PNSsham was conducted with the electrical stimulation unit turned on but without current output. The protocols for AOsham and motor training were the same as those described before.

Intervention Type GENETIC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age between 40 and 80 years;
* has history of first hemispheric stroke of 6or more months;
* presence of electromyographic signals in first dorsal interosseous (FDI) during active abduction of the index finger contralateral to the lesioned hemisphere;
* medically stable;
* able to comprehend instructions.

Exclusion Criteria

* past history of musculoskeletal or neurological impairment in the paretic upper limb;
* recurrent stroke;
* cognitive impairment (Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) \< 24);
* visual impairment not correctable by optical lens;
* presence of metal in the head region or a cardiac pacemaker as contraindications for TMS (Rossi et al., 2009).
Minimum Eligible Age

43 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LIU Hao

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HSEARS20140617001-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain State-dependent PCMS in Chronic Stroke
NCT04830163 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2