Velocity Time Integral vs PICCO for Evaluation of Passive Leg Raising in Septic Shock

NCT ID: NCT03621449

Last Updated: 2022-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the present study is to investigate accuracy of changes in cardiac output following passive leg raising as estimated by transthoracic ultrasound as method to predict fluid responsiveness and compare that to changes in cardiac output following PLR as estimated by calibrated pulse contour analysis as method to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

One method to predict fluid responsiveness is to increase preload by transferring blood from the lower extremities to the central compartment through a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver and then measure the resulting change in cardiac output. It was recently suggested that an increase in cardiac output following PLR had a high accuracy compared other methods to test fluid responsiveness. Different methods to estimate change in cardiac output have been used in studies investigating accuracy of PLR. Most commonly calibrated pulse contour analysis has been used in mechanically ventilated patients whereas transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)has been used in spontaneously breathing patients. While TTE offers the advantage of being less invasive than calibrated pulse contour analysis it is technically challenging and user dependent and the accuracy of the two methods has not been compared.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Septic shock according to the sepsis-3 criteria
2. The treating physician plans to administer fluid to improve organ perfusion and oxygenation due to signs of inadequate organ perfusion and hypoxia (skin mottling, tachycardia (\>100), urine output below 0.5 ml/kg/h, lactate persistently \> 2 mmol/l and central venous oxygen saturation \< 70%, increasing doses of vasoconstrictors to maintain mean arterial pressure \>65 mmHg.
3. Hemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution initiated as part of routine clinical monitoring.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any condition that will affect the reliability of the PLR procedure or is a contraindication to PLR (compression stockings or intraabdominal pressure \> 12 mm Hg, raised intracranial pressure).
2. PaO2/FiO2 \< 100 mmHg (13.3 kPa) or suspicion of cardiogenic edema
3. Transthoracic echo does not allow recording of VTI.
4. Age \>18 years.
5. No informed consent
6. Prior inclusion in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skane

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Bentzer, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical faculty, Lund University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Helsingborg Hospital

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Skåne University Hospital

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RegionSkane ICU 1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lactate Kinetics in Septic Shock
NCT05349370 RECRUITING NA