Long Term Outcome on Brain and Lung of Different Oxygen Strategies in ARDS Patients

NCT ID: NCT03621293

Last Updated: 2018-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

259 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-20

Study Completion Date

2021-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious disease with high mortality. In patients who survive ARDS, respiratory, neurological and motor sequelae are frequent, negatively impacting on the patient's quality of life, and engendering substantial healthcare costs (rehabilitation, long-term care, delayed return to work). There may also be repercussions on the patient's family and entourage. The severity of ARDS and the burden it represents have underpinned intensive research to identify treatment strategies that could improve mortality. However, it is important to ensure that any improvement in mortality does not come at the price of an excess of sequelae and disability in survivors.

The oxygenation strategy used to treat ARDS may have an impact on mortality in these patients. The CLOSE study, in which our group participated, recently demonstrated the feasibility of two oxygenation strategies in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ARDS. We have also initiated the LOCO-2 study (NCT02713451), whose aim is to show a reduction in mortality in ARDS using a "conservative" oxygenation strategy (PaO2 maintained between 55 and 70 mmHg) as compared to a classical "liberal" oxygenation strategy (PaO2 between 90 and 105 mmHg).

The LTO-BLOXY study is a substudy of the on-going LOCO-2 study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The LTO-BLOXY study will compare respiratory, cognitive and exercise function outcomes in patients who underwent one of the two oxygenation strategies in the context of the on-going LOCO-2 study:

* Experimental group: oxygenation will be maintained at a level between 55 and 70 mmHg of PaO2 as measured by blood gas test ("conservative" oxygenation). Between blood gas measures, oxygenation will be optimized to achieve an SpO2 between 88% and 92%.
* Control group: oxygenation will be maintained at a level between 90 and 105 mmHg of PaO2 as measured by blood gas test ("liberal" oxygenation). Between blood gas measures, oxygenation will be optimized to achieve an SpO2 \>96%.

The primary objective is to demonstrate a lower level of impairment of respiratory function at 6 months in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after a "conservative" oxygenation strategy, as compared to a "liberal" oxygenation strategy.

Secondary objectives are numerous and will explore different areas such as evalution of disability, respiratory function, exercise function, cognitive function and quality of life.

Participation in the LTO-BLOXY study will be proposed to all patients included in LOCO-2 at discharge from the ICU. A total of 259 patients from the overall total of 850 expected inclusions in LOCO-2, will participate in the LTO-BLOXY study. These patients will be followed up to 1 year after their initial inclusion in LOCO-2, with a view to evaluate respiratory function, exercise function and cognitive function, as well as QoL.

The calendar of their study participation is as follows:

* Inclusion in LOCO-2 study and randomization LOCO-2
* Inclusion in LTO-BLOXY study at discharge from the ICU
* 3 month visit ± 2 weeks (3 months after inclusion in LOCO-2 study)
* 6 month visit ± 2 weeks (6 months after inclusion in LOCO-2 study)
* 12 month visit ± 2 weeks (12 months after inclusion in LOCO-2 study)

At each follow-up visit, the patient will attend a consultation in the Department of Physiology - Functional Explorations, where the study questionnaires will be given to the patient for completion. The neuropsychologist will perform the cognitive tests, the respiratory function and exercise tests will also be performed at the same visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Liberal Oxygenation (LO) group

A modulation of inspired fraction of oxygen will be performed with an objective of PaO2 between 90 to 105 mmHg that will be checked on arterial blood gases (ABG). Between these measurements, SpO2 will be kept more or equal to 96 percent. Alarms will be set at 95 percent for SpO2.

Intervention: Drug: Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

Intervention Type DRUG

In the two groups, if patient is not in the range of arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2) will be modified from 5 percent if difference between target is less than 5 mmHg and from 10 percent if difference from target is higher. A new arterial blood gases (ABG) will be performed 30 minutes later to check for the oxygen target range. When ABG are performed, pulsed oxymetry is compared with arterial saturation (SaO2) to adapt survey. Between each ABG, FiO2 is modified from 5 percent to 5 percent each five minutes until reaching good pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (that can be modified in function of the comparison of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SpO2 with ABG).

This management of FiO2 will be done until extubation of the patient.

Conservative Oxygenation (CO) group

A modulation of inspired fraction of oxygen will be performed with an objective of PaO2 between 55 to 70 mmHg that will be checked on arterial blood gases. Between these measurements, SpO2 will be kept between 88 and 92 percent. Alarms will be set between 87 and 93 percent for SpO2.

Intervention: Drug: Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

Intervention Type DRUG

In the two groups, if patient is not in the range of arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2) will be modified from 5 percent if difference between target is less than 5 mmHg and from 10 percent if difference from target is higher. A new arterial blood gases (ABG) will be performed 30 minutes later to check for the oxygen target range. When ABG are performed, pulsed oxymetry is compared with arterial saturation (SaO2) to adapt survey. Between each ABG, FiO2 is modified from 5 percent to 5 percent each five minutes until reaching good pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (that can be modified in function of the comparison of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SpO2 with ABG).

This management of FiO2 will be done until extubation of the patient.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

In the two groups, if patient is not in the range of arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2) will be modified from 5 percent if difference between target is less than 5 mmHg and from 10 percent if difference from target is higher. A new arterial blood gases (ABG) will be performed 30 minutes later to check for the oxygen target range. When ABG are performed, pulsed oxymetry is compared with arterial saturation (SaO2) to adapt survey. Between each ABG, FiO2 is modified from 5 percent to 5 percent each five minutes until reaching good pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (that can be modified in function of the comparison of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SpO2 with ABG).

This management of FiO2 will be done until extubation of the patient.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ARDS defined as a PF ratio \<300
* Patients under ventilation for \<12 hours
* Stabilization period of 3 hours with standardization of ventilation parameters

Inclusion criterion specific for neurological evaluation:

\- Patient aged between 20 and 89 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic respiratory failure or on home ventilation (excluding obstructive sleep apnoea)
* Cardiac arrest
* Moribund patients (death likely within 48 hours as assessed by the ICU physician)
* Gaseous embolism
* CO poisoning
* Pregnant women
* Indication for hyperbaric oxygen treatment
* Persistent pneumothorax
* Gaseous gangrene
* DNR or limited care order


* History of neurological disorders: cranial trauma, stroke, cerebral tumor, epilepsy, neuro-degenerative disease.
* Psychiatric disorders: bipolar disorder, psychosis, addiction, schizophrenia.
* Lack of autonomy due to previously documented cognitive and/or psychomotor impairment.
* Hearing and/or sight impairment that prevent the patient from performing the study tests
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bruno DEGANO, MD

Role: CONTACT

3 81 21 87 45 ext. +33

Sophie DEPIERRE

Role: CONTACT

3 81 21 87 45 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Bruno DEGANO

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N/2016/74

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ARDS Caused by COVID-19
NCT04368975 UNKNOWN