Comparison Between Two Operational Techniques for Total Knee Replacement
NCT ID: NCT03605290
Last Updated: 2020-02-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-15
2020-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There are a few operative techniques to perform TKR. Until recently the most common technique is the anterior approach to the knee and then using mechanical instrumentation to make the bone cuts for the femur and tibia. A second popular technique is the anterior approach to the knee and then using a kinematic alignment to make the bone cuts.
The investigators wish to compare short term results of the two operative techniques as evidenced in patient objective functional scores and also by evaluating the gait of the patients by using the REHAGAIT ANALYZER PRO by HASOMED inc. Magdeburg Germany.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Restricted Versus Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment in 1ry TKA
NCT06726993
Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial Between Robotic and Caliper-based Techniques
NCT06709703
Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches In Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01461356
Study of Surgical Technique With Use of Single-radius Prosthesis in Total Knee Replacement
NCT01505452
Comparison of a Minimally Invasive Technique for Total Knee Replacement to a Standard Technique
NCT00175474
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mechanically aligned TKR
patients were operated using the standard mechanically aligned technique
REHAGAIT ANYLIZER
Gait analysis instrumentation
Kinematically aligned TKR
patients were operated using the newer mechanically aligned technique
REHAGAIT ANYLIZER
Gait analysis instrumentation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
REHAGAIT ANYLIZER
Gait analysis instrumentation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to understand and fill out PROMS questionnaires.
* Inability to walk without aids for at least 20 meters.
50 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Uriel Giwnewer
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
haemek MC
Afula, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
003418EMC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.