Reliability and Validity of Outcome Measures for Phantom Limb Pain

NCT ID: NCT03588793

Last Updated: 2021-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-10

Study Completion Date

2020-03-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is experienced by 60-80% of all people who have had an amputation. This persistent pain condition can impact on independence, activities of daily living and overall quality of life.

While there is some research into PLP there is no consensus on appropriate outcome measures and there is (to our knowledge) neither guideline nor literature evidence on the reliability and validity of outcomes measures for this patient group. Such measures are vital to the robust evaluation of any interventions and/or monitoring progression.

The aim of the proposed study is to assess the reliability and validity of four self-report questionnaires (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SFMPQ-2), Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Evaluation Scale (TAPES), a health-related quality of life measure (EQ-5D-L), a pain diary, a left/right limb judgement task (Implicit Motor Imagery Testing - IMIT) and the two-point discrimination (TPD)test.

The data will be collated and statistically analysed to assess how stable each of the measures are over time (intra session reliability) and how each measure co-relates with the others (validity).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Phantom Limb Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Two Point Discrimination

Validity of mechanism in phantom limb pain i.e. cortical reorganisation to be tested using comparison of data from interventions above

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Implicit Motor Imagery Testing

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: ≥ 18 years At least six months post amputation (date of surgery) The amputation must be above wrist/ankle. Are currently experiencing PLP which has persisted for at least 3 months or more They rate their PLP as ≥3 on a 0-10 scale on at least 2 days in the preceding week Concomitant medications;

Exclusion Criteria

* Participating in any research trial of any intervention hypothesised to affect PLP.

Currently under-going active prosthetic rehabilitation e.g. walking training sessions or upper limb rehabilitation sessions.

Any current non-prescribed substance dependency An inability to understand and follow basic instructions - both the two-point discrimination test and left/right limb judgement task requires the participant to follow basic/simple instructions.

Any person, otherwise eligible, who commences any treatment for PLP (physical or pharmacological, prescribed or non-prescribed) will be withdrawn from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teesside University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrew Graham

PhD candidate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Teesside University School of Health & Social Care

Middlesbrough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TU243418

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Power Over Pain (POP) Study
NCT01800604 COMPLETED NA
Chronic Pain Predictors in Major Trauma
NCT07237152 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Two Point Discrimination
NCT03686748 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1