Brain Response Associated With Parent-based Treatment for Childhood Anxiety Disorders
NCT ID: NCT03585010
Last Updated: 2024-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
274 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-01
2024-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Selective Prevention of Anxiety Disorders in Children: A Parent Training Intervention for Anxious Parents
NCT02386410
Dimensional Brain Behavior Predictors of CBT Outcomes in Pediatric Anxiety
NCT02810171
Explanatory Clinical Trial of a Novel Parent Intervention for Childhood Anxiety (SPACE)
NCT02310152
Anxiety Disorders in Children - Association With Neurodevelopmental Delay/Disorder
NCT00553085
Family Based Treatment of Early Childhood Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
NCT00055068
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the first phase of this study we aim to demonstrate that an entirely parent-based psychosocial treatment with no child involvement, Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions (SPACE), engages an amygdala-mPFC target in anxious children, lessening child reliance on parents to reduce amygdala reactivity.
Cross-species neurobiological evidence indicates that parental presence reduces amygdala reactivity and activates the mPFC to reduce offspring anxiety. In humans we recently demonstrated parental presence increases functional connectivity between their child's mPFC and amygdala, reducing the child's amygdala reactivity and anxiety. In a healthy sample, parental engagement of child amygdala-mPFC connectivity was linked to the child's reliance on parents for help with anxiety. Data from clinically anxious children likewise show parental presence engages child mPFC, and data we collected since our previous submission demonstrate that parental presence reduces amygdala reactivity in clinically anxious children.
Offspring's natural reliance on parents for anxiety reduction is magnified in clinically anxious children. Parents become deeply enmeshed in their child's symptoms through the process of family accommodation, defined as change in parents' behavior to help the child avoid or alleviate anxiety. In clinically anxious children, 90% report depending on parents to reduce their anxiety, and 97% of parents report accommodating their anxious child's symptoms. These cross-generational patterns of parental entanglement in their child's anxiety symptoms contribute to the immense burden, distress, and costs of pediatric anxiety (e.g., parents missing work to be with their anxious child). Anxious children's reliance on parents for anxiety reduction may disrupt the child's ability to independently reduce amygdala reactivity and anxiety.
We developed SPACE to translate these neurobiological and clinical research findings into a manualized parent-based treatment focused on reducing family accommodation in parents of anxious children. Preliminary data from a randomized clinical trial show that after 12 weeks of parents receiving SPACE (N=29), with no therapist-child contact, family accommodation and child anxiety were significantly reduced. We propose that SPACE engages anxious children's amygdala-mPFC circuitry, lessening their reliance on parents to reduce amygdala reactivity.
The first phase of the study will examine clinically anxious children's (N=90, 7-10 yrs) amygdala-mPFC response to fear faces when (A) the child's parent is beside them holding their hand during the fMRI scan (Parent-Present), and (B) the child is alone during the scan (Parent-Absent) (within-subjects design). Children with primary separation, social, or generalized anxiety disorder diagnoses, the most common childhood anxiety disorders, will serve as participants. Children will complete Parent-Present and Parent-Absent scans PRE- and POST-SPACE, or PRE- and POST-Parent Educational Support (PES), the comparator treatment that controls for treatment duration and therapist-parent contact. We expect SPACE will lessen child reliance on parental presence to engage amygdala-mPFC circuitry and reduce child amygdala reactivity. Aim 1: Demonstrate SPACE lessens children's reliance on parents to reduce amygdala reactivity (target engagement). Hyp 1: Child reliance on parental presence to reduce amygdala reactivity, (i.e., the difference between child amygdala reactivity in the Parent-Present and Parent-Absent scan), will decrease significantly from PRE- to POST-SPACE, as compared with PRE- to POST-PES. If Hyp 1 is confirmed we will proceed to the the second phase of the study.
The second phase of the study will be performed to re-demonstrate target engagement in SPACE, compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT); demonstrate target engagement is associated with symptom reduction in SPACE; and demonstrate SPACE's acceptability/feasibility. The second phase will enroll 136 clinically anxious children (7-10 yrs), randomly assigned to SPACE or CBT. Aim 1: Re-demonstrate target engagement in SPACE. Hyp 1: Child reliance on parental presence to reduce amygdala reactivity will decrease significantly from PRE- to POST-SPACE, as compared with PRE- to POST-CBT. Aim 2: Demonstrate target engagement is associated with symptom reduction in SPACE. Hyp 2: Reduction in child anxiety from PRE- to POST-SPACE will be significantly associated with reduction in child reliance on parental presence to reduce amygdala reactivity. Aim 3: Establish acceptability and feasibility of SPACE. Hyp 3: SPACE will be acceptable and feasible to administer, and comparable to CBT. The second phase will also provide insight into the relative efficacy of SPACE, to inform future research and development of SPACE.
This study has the potential to provide groundbreaking results, with major public health impact, on how parent-based treatments can target disrupted neurobiological processes in children with psychopathology. These novel data will inform decision-making about a large-scale study (R01) to confirm the efficacy of SPACE and examine personalized treatment strategies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions
Parent-based treatment for childhood anxiety disorders
Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions
12 sessions with parents
Parent Educational Support or CBT
Parent-based intervention for childhood anxiety disorders (phase 1) or child based treatment for childhood anxiety disorders (phase 2)
Parent Educational Support
12 sessions with parents
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
12 sessions with child
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions
12 sessions with parents
Parent Educational Support
12 sessions with parents
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
12 sessions with child
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of primary anxiety disorder
* Must not have another mental illness more impairing than the most impairing anxiety disorder
* IQ of at least 80.
Exclusion Criteria
* Organic mental disorders, psychotic disorders, or pervasive developmental disorders
* High likelihood of hurting themselves or others
* Current psychosocial or psychopharmacological treatment
* History of neurological illness or head injury with loss of consciousness \> 5 minutes
* Vision or physical disability that interferes with seeing stimuli presented briefly on computer screen and/or clicking a mouse button rapidly and repeatedly
* Contraindications for MRI scanning (e.g., metal implants, pacemakers, braces, claustrophobia, pregnancy, weight \> 250 pounds).
6 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
Yale University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eli R Lebowitz, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale University Child Study Center
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.