Beta-blocker vs. Ic Antiarrhythmic Drug for PVC

NCT ID: NCT03561935

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2019-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The standard medical therapy of idiopathic premature ventricular complex consists of beta blocker and Ic antiarrhythmic agent. However, the difference in the efficacy of two drugs has not been well investigated. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-blocker and Ic antiarrhythmic agent in the treatment of symptomatic patients with idiopathic premature ventricular complex.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A premature ventricular complex is frequently observed in routine clinical practice and patients without structural heart disease occasionally have benign outcomes. The initial therapy of symptomatic premature ventricular complex is medical treatment with beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker or antiarrhythmic agents. However, no large prospective study has been performed to identify the difference in the efficacy between drugs. The current study was designed to compare the efficacy between beta-blocker and class Ic antiarrhythmic agent. Patient with symptomatic PVC more than 6000 episode per 24 hours is included. Exclusion criteria are evidence of structural heart disease, coronary heart disease, significant bradycardia or use of a concomitant antiarrhythmic agent. Patients are randomized into beta-blocker group (propranolol) and Ic antiarrhythmic agent group (propafenone). Response to the drug is evaluated after 2 months from randomization by 24 hours Holter and questionnaire. The primary endpoint is more than 80% PVC reduction or PVC burden less than 300 beats per 24 hours. The secondary endpoint is patient's symptom evaluated by questionnaire and the number of PVCs measured in 24 hours Holter.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Premature Ventricular Complex

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propafenone group

Prescribtion of propafenone for the management of premature ventricular complex

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Propafenone

Intervention Type DRUG

prescribing propafenone for the management of premature ventricular complex

Indenol group

Prescribtion of indenol for the management of premature ventricular complex

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Indenol

Intervention Type DRUG

prescribing indenol for the management of premature ventricular complex

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propafenone

prescribing propafenone for the management of premature ventricular complex

Intervention Type DRUG

Indenol

prescribing indenol for the management of premature ventricular complex

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* over 19 years old \>6000 PVCs/24hrs

Exclusion Criteria

* Left ventricular ejection fraction \<50% or Significant valvular disease (≥moderate) History of coronary artery disease Use of a concomitant antiarrhythmic agent Significant bradycardia
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yong Seog Oh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yong Seog Oh

professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yong-Seog Oh, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Catholic University of Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul St Mary's Hospital

Seoul, Seo Ch-gu, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PVC study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.