Is Postoperative Bracing Necessary After Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions

NCT ID: NCT03560401

Last Updated: 2018-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-20

Study Completion Date

2017-10-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was started from Oct. 2015. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of bracing following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The inclusion criteria were age older than 18 years and undergoing TLIF for degenerative lumbar disc disease, spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis. Those who had spinal fracture, spinal infection, spinal tumor, and a history of previous spinal surgery; and those who were lost to follow-up or failed to complete the questionnaires were excluded.

Patients eligible for the study were selected by an independent research assistant. The study was explained, and informed consent was obtained from patients before the surgery. Using a randomization sequence, the patients were assigned to the brace or no brace group. The attending surgeons and patients were blinded before the surgery.

Patients in the brace group were instructed to wear a rigid brace (Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace) full-time for 12 weeks, except when bathing or lying in bed. Patients in the no brace group were instructed to wear a soft corset for 2 weeks, after which it was weaned off. All patients started wearing the brace or corset during their first ambulation out of bed following drainage tube removal after the surgery.

The success of interbody fusion was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) at the 6-month postoperative follow-up using the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) classification6. Radiographic fusion (BSF-3) was defined as bone bridging at least half of the fusion area with at least the density originally achieved at surgery. Radiographic locked pseudarthrosis (BSF-2) was indicated by lucency visible in the middle of the cage with solid bone growing into the cage from each vertebral end plate. Radiographic pseudarthrosis (BSF-1) was indicated by collapse of the construct, loss of disk height, vertebral slip, broken screws, displacement of the cage, significant resorption of the bone graft, or lucency visible around the periphery of the graft or cage.

Perioperative complications, such as wound infection, epidural hematoma, intraoperative dural tear, nerve root damage, and implant dislodgement, were recorded, as were the reoperations and medically related complications within 6 months. The implant-related complications, such as screw loosening, cage migration, or broken screws, detected using plain radiograph at each follow-up and CT scan at the latest follow-up were also recorded. Pedicle screw loosening was defined as a radiolucent zone around the screw on a CT scan at the 6-month follow-up

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical data were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous data were compared using the independent t-test. The two-tailed significance level was set at p \<0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Lumbarsacral Orthosis Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients in the brace group were instructed to wear a rigid brace (Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace) full-time for 12 weeks, except when bathing or lying in bed. Patients in the no brace group were instructed to wear a soft corset for 2 weeks, after which it was weaned off. All patients started wearing the brace or corset during their first ambulation out of bed following drainage tube removal after the surgery.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
Patients eligible for the study were selected by an independent research assistant. The study was explained, and informed consent was obtained from patients before the surgery. Using a randomization sequence, the patients were assigned to the brace or no brace group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Brace group

After spinal surgery, patients in the brace group were instructed to wear a rigid brace (Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace) full-time for 12 weeks, except when bathing or lying in bed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Knight-Taylor [chairback] brace

Intervention Type DEVICE

Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace, is one kind of rigid lumbosacral orthosis. The manufacturer was Rehabilitation and Technical Aid Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

No brace group

After spinal surgery, patients in the no brace group were instructed to wear a soft corset for 2 weeks, after which it was weaned off.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Knight-Taylor [chairback] brace

Knight-Taylor \[chairback\] brace, is one kind of rigid lumbosacral orthosis. The manufacturer was Rehabilitation and Technical Aid Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients underwent TLIF for degenerative lumbar disc disease, spinal stenosis, or spondylolisthesis

Exclusion Criteria

* spinal fracture, spinal infection, spinal tumor, and a history of previous spinal surgery; and those who were lost to follow-up or failed to complete the questionnaires
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming-Chau Chang, M.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yee AJ, Yoo JU, Marsolais EB, Carlson G, Poe-Kochert C, Bohlman HH, Emery SE. Use of a postoperative lumbar corset after lumbar spinal arthrodesis for degenerative conditions of the spine. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2062-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01093.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18829902 (View on PubMed)

Soliman HAG, Barchi S, Parent S, Maurais G, Jodoin A, Mac-Thiong JM. Early Impact of Postoperative Bracing on Pain and Quality of Life After Posterior Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Conditions: A Randomized Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):155-160. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002292.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28632643 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-08-006ACF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lumbar Fusion With Porous Versus Non-Porous Cages
NCT05583864 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Dynamic Stabilization Versus Fusion
NCT01365754 COMPLETED NA