Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion: Comparison of Three HEmostatiC Methods in Transradial Intervention
NCT ID: NCT03558243
Last Updated: 2020-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
1425 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-01
2020-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Trans-radial Cardiac Catheterization
NCT03182530
Use of Glidesheath Slender to Reduce Radial Artery Occlusion and Vascular Access Site Complications Following Transradial Coronary Angiography
NCT02324764
Radial Artery Occlusion and Dual Artery Hemostasis After Transradial Approach.
NCT04933136
Comparison of Distal and Proximal Radial Artery Patency Following Coronary Catheterization, A Real Look at a Special Community
NCT07138170
Safety and Efficacy Between the Distal and Proximal Radial Vascular Access Technique
NCT05066074
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Factors that prevent occlusion of the radial artery have been identified, including the use of several hemostatic techniques at the conclusion of cardiac catheterization.
The patent hemostasis defined as a technique that allows permeability of the radial artery and at the same time ensures the absence of bleeding was the first hemostatic method that showed a decrease in the incidence of radial artery occlusion, it is currently the quality standard for hemostasis in transradial access worldwide. Recently, the patent hemostasis plus ulnar compression was described, which proved in a randomized clinical trial to be superior to conventional patent haemostasis, decreasing the incidence of radial artery occlusion to 0.8% at 30 days. These hemostatic methods are a subject of current research worldwide. And more clinical trials are expected to confirm the superiority of patent hemostasis plus ulnar compression.
The hemostatic discs used at the beginning as an attempt to reduce the times for the hemostasis of the radial access and therefore the recovery times in units of high volume have attracted attention for their effectiveness and their low incidence of radial artery occlusion, there are few reports who place it as a potential strategy to reduce the incidence of radial artery occlusion. Its effectiveness should be validated in dedicated trials with an adequate sample size.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patent Hemostasis Arm
The TR Band (Terumo medical) will be placed on the sheath entry site, the air bladder of the TR Band will be filled with 18 mL of air to achieve initial hemostasis. The sheath will be removed, air will be withdrawn slowly until a pulsatile bleeding is observed through the sheath's orifice, once this phenomenon occurs, 2 ml of air will be added to the air bladder and the absence of bleeding will be corroborated, immediately afterwards a pulse oximeter will be placed on the index finger of the patient and transient manual compression of the ipsilateral ulnar artery will be performed, patency of the radial artery will be corroborated by means of oxygen saturation and adequate pulse curve (Barbeau reverse test), if it is not possible to achieve patent hemostasis, it will be retried deflating 1-2 ml of the TR Band every 15 minutes until a positive reverse Barbeau test with absence of bleeding is achieved. TR Band removal will be attempted 2 hours after the procedure.
Patent Hemostasis arm
Patent hemostasis with TR BAND
ULTRA Arm
The TR Band will be placed at the sheath entry site, the ipsilateral ulnar artery will be compressed at the Guyon's canal by placing a cylindrical composite made by wrapping 4 inch x 4 inch gauze around a 1-inch plastic needle cap, and compressing it using a circumferentially applied Hemoband. After occlusive compression of ulnar artery is confirmed by means of plethysmography, patent hemostasis protocol will be used for radial artery hemostasis as described at the patent hemostasis arm. The needle cap and hemoband that compresses the ulnar artery will be removed 1 hour after the procedure. TR Band removal will be attempted 2 hours after the procedure.
ULTRA arm
Patent hemostasis protocol plus ipsilateral ulnar compression
Hemostatic Disc Arm
The StatSeal hemostatic disc will be placed above sheath entry site, the TR Band will be placed above the disc, according to the manufacturer's specifications the air bladder will be filled with 8 ml of air, the sheath will be then removed, corroborating the absence of bleeding, 20 minutes later 3 ml of air will be removed, 20 minutes after that 5 ml of air will be removed, finally the investigators will try to remove the deflated TR Band 60 minutes after the procedure.
Hemostatic disc arm
StatSeal disc plus TR Band
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patent Hemostasis arm
Patent hemostasis with TR BAND
ULTRA arm
Patent hemostasis protocol plus ipsilateral ulnar compression
Hemostatic disc arm
StatSeal disc plus TR Band
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients over 18 years of age, both genders, who do not give their informed consent to participate in the study.
* Patients over 18 years, both genders, with cardiogenic shock.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart Institute, Mexico
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jesus Reyes
Interventional Cardiology Fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guering Eid-Lidt, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
National Heart Institute, Mexico
Marco A Peña, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
National Heart Institute, Mexico
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Heart Institute
Mexico City, Tlalpan, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PT-18-075
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.